It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by kalamatas
Once again, are animals murders? Are lions, tigers and hippos murderers?
Originally posted by kalamatas
We're talking about food and survival not, malicious intent.
Originally posted by The_Zomar
Originally posted by Sly1one
what other "animal" has constructed rockets, explored the moon, and figured out that there is more out there than "a bright thing" in the sky? How many other "animals" are aware of black holes in the center of our galaxy? How many other animals are aware of what a "galaxy" is? If we were merely animals to the same degree you are comparing us to, you wouldn't be on a computer right now.
You can't equate intelligence with the right to live. If we are ever payed a visit by aliens who's intelligence far surpasses ours, I would hope that they have mercy on mankind...
Humans weren't always intelligent.
Originally posted by The_Zomar
Humans have become all too accustomed with exploiting anyone and anything. We exploit the lesser developed countries in order to benefit the developed nations. We exploit animals simply for the energy to make it to the next meal where we will again take another innocent, defenseless life.
We as a race should work together, we should protect and help all animal species living on mother Earth. We can be the gods of the future if we chose to do so. Unfortunately we are only parasites at this stage in time, and I hope it is just that; a stage in time.
Humanity has some lessons to learn before we ultimately settle the stars. We will forever be stranded on this rock if we continue down the current path we are taking.
...Go ahead and slam another burger, choke down another creature. Humanity will be waiting.
Originally posted by rexusdiablos
Originally posted by kalamatas
Once again, are animals murders? Are lions, tigers and hippos murderers?
By definition (a few exist, mind you), yes.
Originally posted by kalamatas
We're talking about food and survival not, malicious intent.
Incorrect. Convictions shouldn't waiver under the duress of surviving. Would you eat your mother, sibling or friend to simply survive? Look past your specieism, That's all this is at the end of the day,
edit on 22/1/2011 by rexusdiablos because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by rexusdiablos
Originally posted by kalamatas
Once again, are animals murders? Are lions, tigers and hippos murderers?
By definition (a few exist, mind you), yes.
Originally posted by kalamatas
We're talking about food and survival not, malicious intent.
Incorrect. Convictions shouldn't waiver under the duress of surviving. Would you eat your mother, sibling or friend to simply survive? Look past your specieism, That's all this is at the end of the day,
edit on 22/1/2011 by rexusdiablos because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by kalamatas
reply to post by rexusdiablos
Why is it called "humane" when you put a suffering animal down?
Originally posted by PoorFool
Originally posted by rexusdiablos
Originally posted by kalamatas
Once again, are animals murders? Are lions, tigers and hippos murderers?
By definition (a few exist, mind you), yes.
Originally posted by kalamatas
We're talking about food and survival not, malicious intent.
Incorrect. Convictions shouldn't waiver under the duress of surviving. Would you eat your mother, sibling or friend to simply survive? Look past your specieism, That's all this is at the end of the day,
edit on 22/1/2011 by rexusdiablos because: (no reason given)
What definition are you going by that condemns an animal a murderer for killing another animal for food like it's programmed to? You need to step off your high horse and realize this is nature, you do not make the rules.
Originally posted by kalamatas
No, I don't eat people, but I'd eat cow to survive and take care of my family.
Originally posted by rexusdiablos
Originally posted by kalamatas
reply to post by rexusdiablos
Why is it called "humane" when you put a suffering animal down?
I don't know. Maybe you should ask someone who erroneously labels it so.
You seem to think that "humane" as a standard, is a good thing. The conduct of humanity is hardly a standard to live by. Take a look around you. It's a standard we need to strive to supersede and not honor. The same applies to our limited notions of "nature".
Originally posted by rexusdiablos
Originally posted by kalamatas
No, I don't eat people, but I'd eat cow to survive and take care of my family.
Then as I said, grow enough to look beyond your specieism,
Originally posted by PoorFool
What definition are you going by that condemns an animal a murderer for killing another animal for food
Originally posted by PoorFool
it's programmed to? You need to step off your high horse and realize this is nature, you do not make the rules.
Originally posted by rexusdiablos
Originally posted by PoorFool
What definition are you going by that condemns an animal a murderer for killing another animal for food
mur·dered, mur·der·ing, mur·ders
To put an end to; destroy
Originally posted by PoorFool
it's programmed to? You need to step off your high horse and realize this is nature, you do not make the rules.
Should you be willing to mount my said horse, I'll ride you to the brink of truth i.e. you're confusing nature with nurture:
en.wikipedia.org...
Your faith in nature is misguided until you understand this disparity.edit on 22/1/2011 by rexusdiablos because: (no reason given)