It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
...and it would still be a valid argument because proving it's not a fairy and is an ET UFO is impossible.
"If vid analysis were to be done, you can -still- say it's "just as likely a fairy as ET craft" due to lack of a body or interior view."
Originally posted by MasonicFantom
Wingedbull is as full of himself as m0r if he denies all the evidence of UFOs/ET life
Originally posted by MasonicFantom
thinks that's a bug still despite my explaining how it's a physical impossibility
Originally posted by MasonicFantom
I said it "comes from underneath" in my last post on this thread, right above the video. "Bug shooting off to the side"?
Originally posted by MasonicFantom
I think even a stooge can know that if that were the case, the bug would blow up and over the car then
Originally posted by MasonicFantom
bugs don't grow in size with magic.
Originally posted by MasonicFantom
Course, being the kind of schmucks you are, you'd probably try & make an argument those are fairy depictions & thus this argument is endless.
Originally posted by MasonicFantom
If it were a bug on the windshield, it would blow up and over the car. Not go out to the side in a straight path... and it would splatter on the windshield.
Originally posted by MasonicFantom
but using logic, I am ruling out fairies personally.
Originally posted by MasonicFantom
You can make any decision you want. When it gets to this point, you have to put your big boy pants on & your thinking cap then make an educated decision (or, as what it seems you decided to do, wait for a physical body!)
Originally posted by MasonicFantom
Even if this vid were analyzed and proven to be "out of this world"...
UFO = Unidentified Flying Object. UFO ≠ Alien Space Craft. -m0r
Originally posted by B1993
reply to post by The_Zomar
Hey well, to hide them more efficiently, well I do think to their cloaking techniques there are downsides.
As I saw this thread of "Day Before Roswell", it shown there were sighted 9 ufos, then the washington dc one "Ufos Over Washington DC 1952 Youtube video "
If I go here, I find the connection between roswell which was 1947 and Washington DC which was 1952.
This gives us proof, that the cloaking technique wasn't in action since 1947 till 1952 in a sense.
Unless they were getting cocky and aliens thought why not freak out these earthlings! lol
Anyways , that gives us 5 years that the Ufos as in Orbs/disks weren't to get any kind of cloaking yet..
Now that would be the evolving from there to cloaking, I would say getting an upgrade to cloak!
I am sorry that I said evolve to jet or so, I really meant like couldn't they evolve their space craft to blend in with
the crowd and not appear on the
radar?
edit on 17-1-2011 by B1993 because: spelling
Originally posted by mysterioustranger
I cant see them evolving backwards into winged aircraft...after they've prob mastered flight without delta-wings, cockpits, rudders n flaps. They may have been there once like we are now, but its understandable they'd have gone onto to different shapes. Not backwards into wings n feathers.
More like us? We are the cavemen. "Monkeys on a tiny-small blue planet" as one said already (thanks, great analogy!)
Originally posted by MasonicFantom
Wingedbull, no offense, but your video analysis and physics background you display here is very questionable...
Originally posted by m0r1arty
So rather than back up your statement with any attempts of evidence, validity or even supportive reasonable conjecture you attack a perfectly find alternative.
You are incapable of proving your statement because you know that you do not have the ability to do so. It is the only conclusion that can be reached after this many attempts at having you use your alleged pilot observation / software use skills.
Originally posted by TheLegend
You guys are way off topic. Fantom your observations make ample sense (comparing the vids & explaining how it's not an insect but an aerial craft) and I don't see how anyone would not understand it....If someone is asking for more "proof" than that, then they're hopeless.
Originally posted by TheLegend
I'm interested in knowing more about the ancient atomic war stuff fo sho. Did you know about the Vril society during WWII?? They supposedly were in contact with ETs (Vril Damen) and writing down information in ancient Sumerian which the Nazis were using for V1 and V2 rockets & jet engines man. Oberth (head of rocketry program) even said, quote, "We have been helped by the people of other worlds". It may even be worth startin a new topic about it.
Originally posted by TheLegend
The most you can do is make an educated guess about what it is (whether man-made classified craft or ET) and in which case, there's no right or wrong