It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Alfie1
Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by Alfie1
Then you lambast the authors for being frank about " limited accuracy of available measurements "relative to this specific issue . Showing bias much ?
Bias?
The FIRST thing the report does is ASSUME an error in the data regarding the time..
They adjust the time to suit the flight path..Then work on from there..
I am not getting your point. Are you referring to the aircraft clock and official impact times ?
I don't see what the time has to do with the flightpath can you elaborate please ?
Let me ask you this. Supposing the last radio height of 4 feet was so far out that in actual fact the aircraft had sufficient altitude to clear the Pentagon why does the FDR show at exactly the same moment off the scale decelaration ( greater deceleration than the device is capable of recording ) far more severe than any landing ?
off the scale decelaration ( greater deceleration than the device is capable of recording )
Originally posted by Alfie1
reply to post by backinblack
The information was obtained through FOIA requests as the authors say in the paper.
The fact that a device is used in circumstances beyond what it was strictly designed for is not proof that it will fail in those circumstances. You obviously just don't want to know about a Licensed Aircraft Maintenance Engineer-Avionics ( John Bursill ) finding the RADALT readings perfectly feasible. Go have a look on 9/11 Blogger. I did post a link on the previous page.
Originally posted by Alfie1
" Feasible " was my word. What the Avionics Engineer said, in part, over at 9/11 Blogger was " I have no reason to think that the Low Range Radio Altimeter would not be close to accurate enough for the paper's purpose as the angle to the horizontal is very small so the sampling rate is not so important."
This is from someone , as he says, " qualified to fit and repair LRRA systems ".
Against that all we have had is turbofan's unsubstantiated allegation that the radio alt. may be out when the aircraft speed is over 200 knots. He hasn't backed that up with any sources yet and I am not aware that turbo is " qualified to fit and repair LRRA systems"
You have suggested that the final radio height of 4' could be 90' out but you don't have any basis for that; it is just a figure you have plucked out of the air. Have you picked it because that would just be enough to clear the Pentagon. In the which case, I go back to my earlier question. How do you account for the fact that the final radio height was accompanied by deceleration so severe it exceeded the maximum possible for the FDR to record ?
With regard to pressure altitude, the papers authors have gone to considerable trouble considering this, by reference to previous flights in the FDR to establish error. John Bursill says " LRRA is the best source of altitude below 2500 ft."
Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by Alfie1
With regard to pressure altitude, the papers authors have gone to considerable trouble considering this, by reference to previous flights in the FDR to establish error. John Bursill says " LRRA is the best source of altitude below 2500 ft."
John Bursill is probably correct because the system was designed to measure altitude during landings..
Do you really think landing speed is over 400 knots???
Most instruments have "acceptable" limits..
In the fairness of true debate, would YOU care to list the acceptable limits of this instrument??
Or do you simply wish to accept the results as fact, disregarding what others have questioned?
Originally posted by Alfie1You say of the Avionics Engineer John Bursill that he " fixes and installs stuff, He doesn't know how it works ."
If I was John Bursill I would think that very arrogant and presumptive.
(a) Was it an LRA-900 in AA 77 ? Pictures of the recovered FDR I have seen look different.
(b) I didn't see anything in the description or specs warning that the device would be inaccurate at speeds over 330 fps. Did I miss it somewhere ?
With regard to pressure altitude, the papers authors have gone to considerable trouble considering this, by reference to previous flights in the FDR to establish error. John Bursill says " LRRA is the best source of altitude below 2500 ft."
I know you want AA 77's altitude at the Pentagon to be sufficient to clear it so I will ask you the same question I asked another member. How come at the final moment, when radio alt. is recorded as 4', does the FDR record maximum deceleration that the device is capable of recording ?
Already done.
Discussion on this forum about Fake FDR data. ......
Afterall, the do use the same computers and avionics as a real jet.
Here is the difference.....what is GIVING the inputs to those devices!!!! In a real airplane, they are receiving REAL data, from the various sources and equipment as appropriate. Compiled by sensors, converted as needed per the function of the component that uses it.
IN a simulator, it is ALL BINARY CODE!!