It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by loner007
reply to post by SaturnFX
So you think every parent should get net nanny but you wont allow the government to put in its own version to protect kids? and when they do you cry nanny state...jeez give me a break.
Originally posted by Lil Drummerboy
Originally posted by SaturnFX
I do not have kids. .
this is all I needed to understand why you answered why you did.edit on 19-12-2010 by Lil Drummerboy because: (no reason given)
The internet is not some birthright...its a service. its YOU who cannot control your child, not me. I didn't have a child, why should I be made to suffer because your an irresponsible parent whom will bring the porn and violence machine into your house, then complain of the porn and violence?
Originally posted by Rosha
Why should I have to pay to opt out? When its YOU who wants the porn not me? Shouldnt it be 'user pays' ?
They pay monthly for internet service. You pay monthly, I pay monthly, joe down the street pays monthly. if you dont want to have internet...stop paying. Pretty simple..jerk off.
Why should 'everyone' pay to fulfill your need to jerk off?
Because the people whom would fight for this bill are unfit parents anyhow. they are screwed no matter what.
Why shouldnt the mental soveriegnty and health of children be considered the highest social importance?
The places you speak of typically are already regulated with content blockers and monitors.
Why should any child be exposed to pornography just because he wishes to use the public internet? Should it by that reasoning, be perfectly ok for porn films to be shown in public supermarkets and public libraries too, school grounds, cafes?
Fact...most children are molested by someone in their family..often a parent
Why is your personal sexual gratification and voyerism more important than our collective responsibility for all of our childrens safety and psychological wellbeing?
Do you enjoy living in a society where 8 yr olds are now raping 4 yr olds? You think access or exposure to porn has nothing to do with this?
Rosha
Because the people whom would fight for this bill are unfit parents anyhow. they are screwed no matter what.
Fact...most children are molested by someone in their family..often a parent
Therefore, to protect our children...all parents should be removed from the homes and the state should raise children...its "for the children" afterall.
it is the responsible thing to do..can't argue away statistics...so tell you what...you can filter the net, when you agree to be locked up for 18 years after you have a child...after all..we want whats best for our little dumplings...
I mean, why is your personal freedom and enjoyment more important than our collective responsibility for all of our childrens safety and psychological well being?
Originally posted by Rosha
reply to post by Gnarly
..you've obviously are not one of the 1 in 7 victims of rape, or 1 in 3 victims of sexual abuse, never been one of the 1 in 2 groomed by a paedophile. Maybe you've just never seen the absolute crap being passed of as 'consentual sex' on the net and nor do you seem to have any idea the actual cycle of abuse and no insight into the intent and mechanisms behind the pornography industry itself.
I doubt you even truely realise what it is you are defending at all.
In any case, this isnt about restrictiing information or advice or lumping all sex into the "unhealthy" basket. This is about the abuse of sex... the abuse of sex for profit...the abuse of people for profit...the abuse of children...for profit...all happening under the banner of free speech.
This also isnt about your right to view porn..this measure doesnt even touch that. No one is attacking your right to view porn at all.
This measure only determines HOW you will exercise that right....and if you are such a responsible citizen intent of upholding citizens rights, I dont see what the problem is when this is just a case of accepting the *responsibility* that goes with that right.
Whats wrong exactly, with accepting repsonsibility for yourself and being aware of the wider consequences of your choices?
I respect your right to view porn..I would fight for that right for you even though I do not exercise it myself.
If however you are unwilling or choose not to be responsible for that right and its effects on others...that commitment of mine, changes.
I do not uphold your right to view porn over my childs right to remain free to determine the contents of his own mind and his mental and social safety. My kid vs your wank..there's no bet...I know where my responsibility lies.
If you are entitled to free speech..why aren't our kids? Free speech is free..of all coercion..including sexual coercion.
R.
This isnt just about molestation and direct consequences of hyper sexualisation..it's evidence based science about the knock on effects of early sexaulisation to all of us..and the cost to all of our societies and our humanity as a whole. The abused abusing and abusing in kind. From rape and zoosex sites advertising freely to abuse laden parents buying g strings for 3 year olds...it all started somewhere..eventually we have to say stop..or go the way of the dodo. This isnt just 'for the children' its for all of us.
Originally posted by justwokeup
Actually the porn industry will love this, the internet is killing them. Think of the DVD sales if the internet is locked down.
I'm in a cynical mood today :-)
Originally posted by Gnarly
reply to post by Rosha
This isnt just about molestation and direct consequences of hyper sexualisation..it's evidence based science about the knock on effects of early sexaulisation to all of us..and the cost to all of our societies and our humanity as a whole. The abused abusing and abusing in kind. From rape and zoosex sites advertising freely to abuse laden parents buying g strings for 3 year olds...it all started somewhere..eventually we have to say stop..or go the way of the dodo. This isnt just 'for the children' its for all of us.
Where are your sources? I believe I have asked already. I want to see some real proof, not just some poorly written article, or your own thoughts. I want links, and actual data.
Originally posted by David_Reale
Afte reading some of the replies, I'm going to have to comment beyond, "Don't take away my pr0n". This is after all one of the more retarded things I've ever heard of.
My self interest is for a person whom chooses something to be responsible for what they choose verses try and make everything change around them to make it slightly easier for them.
Just dont have the hide pleas, e to whinge in other forums about the decaying "state of society" when your not willing to put your neck on the line for anything other than your own self interest.
zoosex? anyhow...thats all a distraction from the point. The playboy magazine when it first came out was hailed as the epic end of society...thats it, game over..we will all be raging pervs in 20 years.
This isnt just about molestation and direct consequences of hyper sexualisation..it's evidence based science about the knock on effects of early sexaulisation to all of us..and the cost to all of our societies and our humanity as a whole. The abused abusing and abusing in kind. From rape and zoosex sites advertising freely to abuse laden parents buying g strings for 3 year olds...it all started somewhere..eventually we have to say stop where we CAN say stop..or go the way of the dodo. This isnt just 'for the children' its for all of us.
What evidence are you talking about? Your opinion is not evidence. What is seen on the television is not a spike in any sex crime...it is society actually reporting sex crimes now. you think that pre-internet, people didn't get raped? heh...no...their was if not equal, then alot more sex related crimes in our past...but it was brushed under the carpet, dismissed, and ultimately ignored. There hasn't been a safer time in society to raise a kid than now...and that includes the good ole 50s when such things were simply not discussed (even though it was commonplace)
You are free to ignore the evidence that points to a lack of personal responsibility being a precursor for this spiral down state of our societies and the evidence that shows how that responsibility has been abdicated.
You are free to do that all you like..your NOT free and no one in our world is however, from the consequences of denying that responsibility...consequences that you as much as any abuse victim will live with forever.
When I was responsible for children (was a stepdad), we had a tight control on the media the house had. We had content control on the computer, and there was no cable past watershed. I didn't ask everyone around me to please stop finding their own happiness in whatever they did..I took care of my own and that was that.
Rule your house as you've chosen I supose.....its your life...your kids lives..your siblings and your countrymens lives not mine.
aka...parenting...good for you. Glad you actually see a role for yourself in your kids life.
Mine, well until society grows up mine get comptuors in the lounge room, free and healthy open debates about what sex is and isnt...they get taught *respect* for their minds and bodies and the minds and bodies of others, not how to abuse them use them or prostitute them for anothers pleasure, and more, they get MY protection from the hyenas and jackles as is my obligation as a parent. Dont like that? Write a letter.
No, in supporting this, you are saying that no parent is up to par as you are...that you know what is best for other peoples children, and that everyone should be made to suffer because of what you deem is morally objectionable. Society control...or actually, the absolute opposite of social justice.
In supporting this inititive I am simply extending that personal responsibility outwards to embrace those kids that that like myself at their age, dont have mums or dads like me who are watching their backs and kicking ass for them.
No, its shining a light on kneejerk judgement because someone tossed the magic 3 words in "for the children". People will give up their right to free speech if someone can twist that into a for the children meme.
In defending OUR rights to freedom yes, I am willing to stand up to self centered pricks that are trying to demonize good sound judgements that will benefit many not just one.
I have seen nothing that is "protecting children"...however, I do see something being pushed to "enforce stateism over familys decision...and a blatantly obvious slipperly slope "for the children". Frankly, as a parent, you should feel insulted that such measures are being taken because they are pretending to care for children.
Its a sad irony that defending and protecting children has become a social sin....that alone speaks volumes about why I will and do continue to do so.
dont like? sue me.
Originally posted by SaturnFX
I respect your view. I simply see it wildly different because I am not easily kneejerk responding to the "for the children" meme.
It is the new religion, the new way to bring a iron grip slowly around any and all information. There is always an elegant argument to be made on why yet another liberty is regulated, then ultimately removed from society.
and so you don't think I am some far right wing nutjob...couldn't be further from the truth..I am a progressive liberal whom is interested in social justice...but as I said...this is certainly not social justice...this is conditioning, control, and destruction.