It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by NoJoker13
reply to post by janon
So laws that are passed aren't majority vote? Sanctions, Taxes, Implementing devices are all taken on a vote and the majority has a much bigger say then the minority. Yes, you are protected but from what? Not getting any laws passed because your on the short end of the stick? Or that your able to believe anything you want while you stay in a hole? Is that what the minority fights for?
Originally posted by NoJoker13
reply to post by Blarneystoner
Wow way to take what I said out of context and run with it. I referred to the no shirt, no shoes policy, but if someone would want that then it couldn't be a public shop, it'd have to be a private club and yes they still have those. My point is don't follow the rules on the wall, don't fly.
Originally posted by NoJoker13
reply to post by Blarneystoner
Clearly it isn't hard to stand, but you have to first think that these scanners are unconstitutional... To me they aren't neither is a pat down. So at this point to me your arguement is going no where, but clearly in your case that must be difficult to grasp.edit on 23-11-2010 by NoJoker13 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by NoJoker13
reply to post by janon
I agree with you but what exactly is the individual being protected from? Themselves? The government? Other people? Because although that is true at the end of the day whether we are all or nothing rests on the shoulders of the government and even though these things were put into place a very long time ago, the world now is much different.
Originally posted by NoJoker13
reply to post by Blarneystoner
Clearly it isn't hard to understand, but you have to first think that these scanners are unconstitutional... To me they aren't neither is a pat down. So at this point to me your arguement is going no where, but clearly in your case that must be difficult to grasp.edit on 23-11-2010 by NoJoker13 because: (no reason given)edit on 23-11-2010 by NoJoker13 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Lemon.Fresh
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, SHALL NOT BE VIOLATED, and Warrants shall not be issued, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
So where is the warrant, describing the place to be searched, and the things to be seized, supported by Oath or affirmation that there is probable cause, against every single person that decides to buy a plane ticket?
Originally posted by Blarneystoner
Man Proves TSA Policies are Unconstitutional
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
reply to post by janon
You may be right, I just don't know.
Originally posted by Blarneystoner
Man Proves TSA Policies are Unconstitutional
He didn't prove anything was unconstitutional. He just proved that he could frustrate the TSA Agents and the Law Enforcement officers enough to let him go. Remember, he had already flown. He just wanted out of the airport.
I commend him GREATLY and I think he has made a perfect model for people to follow, should they be interested. I think the most important thing he did was be polite and remain calm. But I'll bet you a dollar if he was on his way TO the plane, he'd be in jail right now.
By simply remaining calm and polite while citing his constitutional rights, Kernan proved that, despite the best efforts of the TSA to intimidate people into submission by threatening $11,000 fines, it is not illegal to refuse to be put through a radiation scanner or be groped by TSA workers.
Kernan proved that the whole procedure is unconstitutional and a violation of rights, and after acknowledging this fact, TSA officials and the airport police had no other choice but to let him go free.
I think this is complete and utter bull, to me these devices stop more harm then they cause
Originally posted by NoJoker13
reply to post by janon
So laws that are passed aren't majority vote? Sanctions, Taxes, Implementing devices are all taken on a vote and the majority has a much bigger say then the minority. Yes, you are protected but from what? Not getting any laws passed because your on the short end of the stick? Or that your able to believe anything you want while you stay in a hole? Is that what the minority fights for?