It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Ellen Brown, on October 10, 2010 at 9:32 pm Said:
Here’s the reason for freezing foreclosures: Wall Street was engaged in a massive fraud. They were purposely taking bad loans so they could bet against them with their synthetic CDOs. As Neil Garfield points out, sometimes there were 30 of these on one house. A $300,000 house is worth $300,000 if it doesn’t go into default; if it does default, it’s worth $9 million. The banks that set these things up need to be put into receivership, like they should have been in Sept 2008. We have a second chance under the new reform bill.
Originally posted by St Udio
NO No Nooo...
Mortgages bundled into securities were a favorite investment of speculators at the height of the financial bubble leading up to the crash of 2008. The securities changed hands frequently, and the companies profiting from mortgage payments were often not the same parties that negotiated the loans. At the heart of this disconnect was the Mortgage Electronic Registration System, or MERS, a company that serves as the mortgagee of record for lenders, allowing properties to change hands without the necessity of recording each transfer.
MERS was convenient for the mortgage industry, but courts are now questioning the impact of all of this financial juggling when it comes to mortgage ownership. To foreclose on real property, the plaintiff must be able to establish the chain of title entitling it to relief. But MERS has acknowledged, and recent cases have held, that MERS is a mere “nominee”—an entity appointed by the true owner simply for the purpose of holding property in order to facilitate transactions. Recent court opinions stress that this defect is not just a procedural but is a substantive failure, one that is fatal to the plaintiff’s legal ability to foreclose.
That means hordes of victims of predatory lending could end up owning their homes free and clear—while the financial industry could end up skewered on its own sword.
Originally posted by hinky
I'm tired of hearing people whine about how they were screwed. Everyone went into these loans with their eyes wide open.
Originally posted by hinky
So then, we pass a law to rewrite some loans, and 60% of them still go through foreclosure a second time.
Originally posted by Mary Rose
Ellen Brown, on October 10, 2010 at 9:32 pm Said:
. . . Wall Street was engaged in a massive fraud. They were purposely taking bad loans so they could bet against them . . .
(Link)
Originally posted by Mary Rose
The foreclosure mess is not from sloppiness or irresponsible borrowers it's from fraud motivated by profits to be gained by selling derivatives.
Wondering if you are one of those suckers paying a mortgage in limbo, with all the payments due to some non-existent mortgage noteholder getting retained at the servicer banks? Well, if you can spare 3 minutes then "Where's the Note" is for you. The website, which is on the verge of a viral break out, has a simple message: "Whether you are facing foreclosure, have an underwater mortgage, or are just a concerned homeowner, it’s important that you contact your bank and demand to see the original note on your mortgage. It only takes a few minutes using our free online tool." Quick, simple and easy. And in a few days your mortgage bank will have no choice but to tell you if they do in fact have your original mortgage note. . . .
North Dakota owns it's own bank. No other state, including Maine, does.
Not only is it solvent with its own bank and a budget surplus of $1.2 billion, its personal income has grown 43 percent, and wages grew by 34 % this year.