It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Reign02
reply to post by AndrewJay
Well man has been ruling man since the beginning of time. There will always be someone in charge. Our world is way to messed up. We have to have some kind of order. Anarchy is all I smell from this thread. Yea lets not have a government or any kind of leaders.... That is real smart.
Originally posted by Subjective Truth
Anarchy is a teenagers dream. It has no future. Show me one society that thrived under it.
Originally posted by Theyarelying
We need something MORE stable, something that works... Even if its a dictatorship and we are lead by the decisions of one person.
Originally posted by NewlyAwakened
Originally posted by Subjective Truth
Anarchy is a teenagers dream. It has no future. Show me one society that thrived under it.
Early colonial America.
Anarchy works, but only under certain circumstances, among them being low population density.
In any case, the OP was not promoting anarchy but direct democracy.
Actually now that I read the post again it seems that part was removed (either that or I just interpreted the second paragraph wrong) and it sounds more like anarchy. Which would mean my first reply on this thread makes no sense.
[edit on 30-8-2010 by NewlyAwakened]
Originally posted by Subjective Truth
You are so wrong either you have no idea of what colonial life was like or you believed a liar. It was not anarchy by any stretch of the word. They had stricter codes then we do today.
Originally posted by joechip
Originally posted by Theyarelying
We need something MORE stable, something that works... Even if its a dictatorship and we are lead by the decisions of one person.
The above statement wildly contradicts your original post. I don't think it necessary to point out how.
Originally posted by joechip
reply to post by Theyarelying
You don't just "seem" contradicting, you are contradicting your original post; the subject we're all discussing because you started this thread. Perhaps you should take the time to get your own political beliefs straight before you start a thread next time. I'm not talking about labels at all, by the way. I don't care if you consider yourself apolitical, and it disturbs you that the "anarchists" all happen to agree with the spirit of your original post, to follow "man cannot rule man" with 'perhaps we need a dictator' is confused thinking at best. Maybe you didn't mean what you said in the original post, I suppose you could have expressed your dissatisfaction with the current system with hyperbole. And then the nuts like me agreed with your exaggeration. The problem here is I shouldn't have to do these mental gymnastics to figure out what you actually mean.
The contradiction isn't a minor one. You've undermined your own basic point.
Originally posted by Reign02
I have been to Iraq, Iran, Saudi, Afghanistan, Nigeria, and Uganda just to name a few places. You think your quality of life is bad why don't you go to one of the many countries in the world and see how they are living. People are dying in Africa from starvation, people are dying in the middle east simply because they are of another branch of Islam, People in Africa are being slaughtered because they are from a different tribe.
And YOU sitting in your air conditioned house, browsing the internet, watching TV, driving a car, living in a house/apartment, and have the ability to have whatever you want
[edit on 28-8-2010 by Reign02]
Originally posted by wayouttheredude
The only way to institute a society of intelligent and capable people is to eliminate those who do not contribute to that society. That is not acceptable to society of course so will not be instituted. We must carry on with all of the mental subs intact in order to be morally and politically correct.
Originally posted by joechip
If you hate how things work here (ats), why start threads here? I'm pretty sure there was nothing insulting (or expressing an undue lack of compassion) about my response. My point was that you can't title a thread "man cannot rule man" and then act surprised (and dismayed) when a debate about anarchy breaks out, or indignant when your later call for dictatorship is called out as contradictory.
And to compare a major contradiction (directly undermining your own original point) and a misspelling is like complaining that your dinner hosts were unreasonable for kicking you out of their house for belching at the table and crapping on the floor...it probably was not the belching that did it.
The two things are of a different order altogether. I misspell constantly and nobody cares.
And if you only meant, "i don't care, give me something that works," try saying that. Of course no one is going to give you anything of the sort, but at least you will have expressed what you actually meant. And different forms of governance would be the appropriate conversation, not the merits (or lack thereof) of anarchy.
No hard feelings, I hope. Believe me, if my relatively gentle observations offended you, you're going to have to toughen up quite a bit to navigate these waters.
[edit on 1-9-2010 by joechip]
[edit on 2-9-2010 by joechip]
[edit on 2-9-2010 by joechip]