It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by alien
"Excuse me Sir, but please watch your language in public"
Originally posted by Sherlock Holmes
Perhaps we should ban people wearing football shirts, too ?
Originally posted by Sherlock Holmes
The violence it may cause will undoubtedly lead to a criminal offence being committed.
It seems illogical and draconian to ban something legal, because it may cause another person to do something illegal.
As previously mentioned there are a number of non-racial slurs that would induce similar violent responses when aimed at people.
I don't need to gratuitously print what slurs those are !
People can get violent in regards to terms about politics, religion, and even sport.
In fact, if you wear a team's football shirt in an area that's largely populated by fans of that teams' rival, then you may well find yourself in a violent altercation.
Perhaps we should ban people wearing football shirts, too ?
Originally posted by Dark Ghost
Isn't that a sad aspect of Western society though? Having to walk on egg shells and watch what you say because you might offend a minority. Meanwhile, average Joe White can be ridiculed and denigrated in the media as stupid, selfish and mercenary.
Originally posted by Dark Ghost
Is it because they use the racial slurs or because you fear you will be linked to them via "guilt by association" when others hear them use them? I'm guessing it is the guilt by association link and that is a sad reflection on the society in which we live: fearing others will judge us by the words and actions of our friends.
Originally posted by masqua
Geez... we've see "God-given rights' brought into this and now it's footy shirts?
The OP topic is the legality of using the n-word in public... in point of fact a fax sent to the local government. Read the link provided and you'd find it wasn't the first time the retiree was abusive in his faxes.
Let's not stray too far afield.
Originally posted by Dark Ghost
I guess it also comes down to common sense. I would have little sympathy for a Liverpool fan who flashes their scarf in the face of a group of Man United supporters, are asked to stop but continue to provoke and wind up getting punched in the face.
I agree that it's sad that people may have to constantly monitor their own innocuous comments, just in case some overzealous race-obsessed person accuses them of making a racist remark.
Originally posted by Sherlock Holmes
I just think it's uncivilised and unintelligent to single anybody out because of their race, religion, nationality, hair colour, physical appearance etc.
If a grown man is going around using racial slurs, then it indicates a lack of intelligence and reasoning, if he's gone through life dividing people in his mind along these lines. It also shows a lack of sociability.
but I won't stand up for the right for someone to be offensive or ignorant.
Is the world a better place if you're able to call a different coloured guy something degrading?
The judge thought so and so does the defendant.
Originally posted by Kandinsky
Without me swinging this discussion way off topic...you are aware of why legislation was introduced about racist language? You're aware of the social equality battles in the past couple of hundred years?
Class issues, then gender issues and then race issues. Laws have always, ultimately, been brought in to ensure that changes are made to society and people are accountable.
Originally posted by Kandinsky
I don't know how old you are, but I've seen racism in England decline sharply from the late 80s. A lot of that is due to legislation.
Originally posted by Kandinsky
I'll stand up for many things and many freedoms, but I won't stand up for the right for someone to be offensive or ignorant. Is the world a better place if you're able to call a different coloured guy something degrading? The judge thought so and so does the defendant.
Originally posted by Dark Ghost
I have to disagree with you here. It is more the media conditioning people to judge those who happen to be racist/xenophobic as lacking intelligence and reason. Being racist, xenophobic, antisemitic, homophobic etc. has no bearing on one's capacity to be intelligent, knowledgeable or educated. These are merely labels given to people with views we do not agree with and mindsets we think are wrong.
Originally posted by Sherlock Holmes
It is unintelligent and lacking in reasoning to lump a whole group of people together, and make negative comments about them, purely because of their race.
It shows a lack of intelligence for people not to suddenly think: ''Hang on a minute, are my blanket statements about this race actually accurate, or am I just unreasonably prejudiced ?''.
The problem with prejudice is that it's self-perpetuating.
If someone has a pre-conceived idea about negative traits of a certain race, then they are going to notice them more in people they meet from that particular race.
Which in their minds will ''justify'' their biased observations about these traits.
Originally posted by ProdigalSon
Oh man,
i get so angry if someone calls me the "w-word",
although i am a "w-word" but still it is offensive to call me that way.