It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by masqua
Use those words against myself or any other member of my family and I'd likely be up on assault charges.
Originally posted by masqua
Yeah... and I sure hope I'd get a different judge than that robed racist when my assault case comes up for trial.
Originally posted by masqua
Yeah. Yelling 'FIRE' in a crowded theatre, joking about bombs in a suitcase at the airport or even picking on redheads are rights too, as much as making racially disparaging comments in an ethnic community should be, correct? Go ahead and try to use those rights. It might be enlightening.
Unbelievable. That retiree needs his meds boosted a bit and that judge needs a refresher in civil law.
Originally posted by Kandinsky
reply to post by Subjective Truth
All speech should be free no matter what. Because political correctness is subjective. Do you see my point? Who draws the line?
Can I start shouting "Fire! Fire!" in a crowded theatre or football game?
Like it or not, lines are drawn between my freedom of speech and my responsibilities.
Instead of 'political correctness' the Judge has missed an opportunity to bring the old guy up to date. He could have pointed out that some words are unacceptable in this day and age. Instead, he chose to validate the terminology on the grounds of a generation gap. Absurd.
Originally posted by Kandinsky
Instead of 'political correctness' the Judge has missed an opportunity to bring the old guy up to date. He could have pointed out that some words are unacceptable in this day and age. Instead, he chose to validate the terminology on the grounds of a generation gap. Absurd.
Originally posted by Sherlock Holmes
The problem here is that using a plethora of non-racial slurs will induce a similar physical response in other people, too.
Do we outlaw every single cuss-word, then ?
Originally posted by alien
Rocking up to someone and abusing them is actually illegal.
Try it some time. Walk into a shop and spout off some abuse at the shopkeeper.
The words themselves aren't the issue...the action is.
Originally posted by Sherlock Holmes
I'm pretty sure it could only possibly be illegal if it is done in a threatening manner.
Originally posted by masqua
Too true. What the trend in this thread has been is to exonerate the reprehensible behaviour and to squash the anger it generates. If that's common sense, then Jim Crow belts make good soup in hard times.
Originally posted by Sherlock Holmes
There's no need to exonerate the behaviour.
Every action has a consequence, and the consequence of someone casually throwing racial slurs around is bound to be them being ostracised by most people that know them.
I know I personally wouldn't want to be closely acquainted with someone who knowingly used racial slurs, as he or she probably wouldn't be that intelligent, and they probably have other ''issues'' that makes them see along racial lines everywhere.
There's nothing wrong with feeling anger if someone insults you, but is best not to act on that anger in most circumstances, because it could land you into trouble.
You can't just self-indulgently attempt to justify assault, because someone said some ''bad words'' to you.
The problem lies with actually making a word illegal because it might upset or morally outrage people.
That's just ridiculous.
Originally posted by alien
Umm nope. Public Profanity can cover it.
Originally posted by alien
Also - definitions of 'threatening manner' can be quite variable...and also individualistic, often defined from the viewpoint of the receiver not the deliverer.
I may walk into a shop and think it a huge laugh to comment on the guys nose, hair, call them a few choice words...I may even have absolutely NO harmful intent with it...BUT, it the person themselves considers, perceives, that I do pose some real potential of threat, of harm to them...then I have committed Common Assault...
...without even laying a hand on the guy...
Originally posted by masqua
Does anyone think that perhaps the reason some words were made illegal is for the violence it generates in the wider community?
Originally posted by Sherlock Holmes
Perhaps we should ban people wearing football shirts, too ?