It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by zroth
At the end of the day the commandments of Jesus are simple. Love God completely and Love your neighbor as yourself.
Jesus called his teachings the way. Christianity was a method for Rome to maintain control and keep the empire strong.
Originally posted by TiM3LoRd
yeah i kind of brought that point up before. not getting a lot of reply's about the points i raised just more merry go round comments that go nowhere.
Originally posted by adjensen
Originally posted by TiM3LoRd
Originally posted by adjensen
Originally posted by zroth
Originally posted by TiM3LoRd
reply to post by zroth
i understand the concepts you are trying to explain but these are not the traditional christian views. which is what i have contention with. also nothing all knowing can be surprised. its a paradox.
sure. there is no traditional Christianity without a baseline denomination to discuss. there is catholic, Lutheran, LD S, etc.
Yes and no. You may discuss Christianity as it is described in the Bible, which is Christianity without doctrinal influences. It does not, of course, exist as an organized religion today, so to put things into context, most people do need to draw in a specific doctrine.
Many Christians, including myself, have a difficult time including Latter Day Saints as a Christian faith, as their beliefs in many area are contrary to Christian teaching. If you have been baptized in the LDS Church and wish to convert to Methodism or Catholicism, for example, you will need to be baptized again, as those churches will not accept the Mormon baptism as a Christian one.
and you dont see the hypocrisy of all this baptizing? do you really think god cares??? really?? its water on your head. why would god care whether if it was done by one priest or another???
How is that hypocrisy? Baptism is one of the few sacraments of the church, meaning that it's a critical part of the process of becoming a Christian. If you come in and claim that the time someone dumped a beer over your head, yelling "Go Packers!" is the same thing as baptism, is it reasonable to believe that the Catholic Church is going to say "okay, sounds like you've already had the sacrament"?
If the LDS church is not considered Christian, their baptism has as much validity as the beer over the head one, from a doctrinal standpoint (I don't want to imply that the Mormons don't think it's every bit as valid as a Catholic or Lutheran one, but the Catholics and Lutherans would beg to differ.)
Originally posted by TiM3LoRd
reply to post by adjensen
im confused..... so are you saying you dont believe in the king james version of what happened in the bible as gospel truth or not? regardless about what you believe jesus's story was it all stems from the bible. old and new.
20 If, however, the charge is true and no proof of the girl's virginity can be found, 21 she shall be brought to the door of her father's house and there the men of her town shall stone her to death. She has done a disgraceful thing in Israel by being promiscuous while still in her father's house. You must purge the evil from among you.
22 If a man is found sleeping with another man's wife, both the man who slept with her and the woman must die.
23 If a man happens to meet in a town a virgin pledged to be married and he sleeps with her, 24 you shall take both of them to the gate of that town and stone them to death—the girl because she was in a town and did not scream for help, and the man because he violated another man's wife
28 If a man happens to meet a virgin who is not pledged to be married and rapes her and they are discovered, 29 he shall pay the girl's father fifty shekels of silver. [c] He must marry the girl, for he has violated her. He can never divorce her as long as he lives.
Originally posted by TiM3LoRd
i didnt see god on the 6 o clock telling me LDS were not christians? and what about roman catholics and anglicans what about the orthodox where do you draw the line. you cant even agree amongst your selves how can you convince a total noob.
Originally posted by TiM3LoRd
reply to post by adjensen
look your beliefs about jesus are all well and good but im talking about god based on what the old testament describes. my contention is with the paradoxs therein. because as far as im concerned if the old and new testament are all in one book then the PTB intend it to be viewed as one book. and thus should be treated as one. if it isnt then what they are doing is deliberate fraud. which is another kettle of fish.
how can god be jealous of man worshiping another god when there is only one god. how does that work? are there other gods?
Originally posted by dusty1
reply to post by adjensen
With all do respect, you are totally wrong.
Jesus quoted the "Old Testament" many times, and talked about Noah. Mathew 24 36-39
1Peter 3:20 and Hebrews 11:7 also talk about the account of Noah.
Isaiah contains many prophesies relating to Jesus.
But whether Noah existed, and whether the behaviours of his described in Genesis truly happened have no bearing on Christ, none.