It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by DISRAELI
reply to post by MidnightDStroyer
It does seem to me, though, that your version of "being traded on the Stock Exchange" is very abstract and has no practical effect on the person "being traded".
Originally posted by metro
Like I said, they must have juristiction over you for their laws to apply. When you enter court, think of it as entering a game that is played by their rules - just like "life".
Originally posted by Cythraul
Originally posted by Pauligirl
I haven't seen it save anybody from anything.
Did you not watch the video I posted here? It's only about 10 minutes long and it's what you're looking for. You asked for it.
Originally posted by Pauligirl
I saw it. Do you have any proof that the charges against Barry were actually dismissed?
Originally posted by Cythraul
Originally posted by Pauligirl
I saw it. Do you have any proof that the charges against Barry were actually dismissed?
The video indicates that they were - and why would he have distributed it if it had proven unsuccessful? The only possible reason would be that he is 'part of the system' and deliberately wants to mislead people. I don't think that's realistic.
Incidentally, do you know that the charges weren't dismissed? I'd say that video was a pretty good response to your requests for evidence of this whole theory working... or do you want not to believe it? Remember - I'm merely investigating it all myself.
Reay posts: So the whole exercise was a failure then. The Liability order was granted.
Rebel leader: Nah it wasn't a failure ... the magistrate committed fraud on video - they issued the LO after the court we left the court because we know they didnt want the Police seeing the fraud take place - BIG Commercial Lien coming the magistrates way - they will have to deal with the Lien before they proceed in that case is the lien brings estoppel!
Originally posted by paraphi
Why would you not register your child? For some silly paranoid principle you are prepared to jeopardise your child’s life by completely messing things up for them. For example, they won’t be able to apply for a passport and won’t have a national insurance number issued, thus preventing them from being employed. If something happened, they would have difficulty proving they had e.g. inheritance rights etc…
Originally posted by MidnightDStroyer
It's that very same registration that enforces those oppresive Statutes...why should you need a passport if the SCOTUS has ruled that we have an inalienable right to "travel freely on public roads & to transport personal belongings" in the first place? Why must we have the government's permission to leave our own country?
Originally posted by MidnightDStroyer
Why does your child have to have government-sponsered health care?...Unless the parents themselves won't do it? It all boils down to Personal Responsibility for yourself & your family: If you don't take care of them, the government will...And they'll make you jump through hoops of red tape to get it!
Originally posted by MidnightDStroyer
The whole idea behind the Constitution & Common Law is that people are free to make their own decision, without government interference. But the government doesn't like the idea of self-control & self-determination among people, so they strive to take control over everything. Government strives to create a sense of irresponsibility in society itself so that it can take control.