It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Airport security personnel in British airports have been barred from scanning passengers under 18 years old with the newly adopted full body scanners due to warnings that the new devices may breach child pornography laws.
The full-body scanners adopted by British airports in the wake of the failed Christmas Day bombing attempt have come under fire over fears that the graphic images produced by the x-ray machines may violate child pornography laws.
Originally posted by Danbones
note to self:
drink coffee
then post
They don't scan children in britain anymore
also from the above link:
Airport security personnel in British airports have been barred from scanning passengers under 18 years old with the newly adopted full body scanners due to warnings that the new devices may breach child pornography laws.
The full-body scanners adopted by British airports in the wake of the failed Christmas Day bombing attempt have come under fire over fears that the graphic images produced by the x-ray machines may violate child pornography laws.
Considering that the US state department has revealed they put the underwear bomber on the plane without a passport, and shepherded him all the way through the process,
and it turns out they were setting these machines up a year before that incident, and that cadaver, oops I mean former head of home land security owns interest in the machine's company,
I'd say the whole scanner thing is extremely suspect.
After the Franklin savings and loan scandle revealed just what type of pervos are in high places, I would just assume that any risque images are automatically circulated.
[edit on 20-7-2010 by Danbones]
Originally posted by Mobius1974
reply to post by FreeSpeaker
You are going to your Dr. and agree to have this procedure done..
Airport scanner.. You comply or you dont fly.
I have noticed in your previous posts on ATS that you normally use logic when making posts...Why, in this one, are you failing so miserably, to back up your opinions, with anything more than failed comparisons?
I know you are a better debater than this... Bring your A game!
The Detroit Christmas bomber was deliberately and intentionally allowed to keep his US entry visa as the result of a national security override issued by an as yet unknown US intelligence or law-enforcement agency with the goal of blocking the State Department’s planned revocation of that visa. This is the result of hearings held on January 27 before the House Homeland Security Committee, and in particular of the testimony of Patrick F. Kennedy, Undersecretary of State for Management. The rickety US government official version of the December 25 Detroit underwear bomber incident, which has been jerry-built over the past month and a half, has now totally collapsed, and key elements of the terrorism-spawning rogue network inside US agencies and departments are unusually vulnerable to a determined campaign of exposure.
Originally posted by Kr0nZ
heres a link to a example of what these pictures look like
WARNING THE FOLLOWING LINK IS UNCENSORED
www.rupture.co.uk...
i think these pictures are pretty damn revealing
if im given the option i would definitely opt out
[edit on 20-7-2010 by Kr0nZ]
Originally posted by Danbones
I asked a question of Freespeaker
I notice it has been avoided.
Originally posted by Danbones
What are those Images in countries where they do put the children through the machines?
Originally posted by Danbones
If you knew your doctor was a pedophile would you still allow him to access your child?