The spat between Russia and Belarus over money owed (in both directions) just ratcheted up another notch:
Belarus will suspend Russian transit gas deliveries to Europe after Moscow cut supplies in a dispute over debts, President Alexander
Lukashenko says.
Mr Lukashenko said the neighbours were facing a "gas war" and he would resume supplies only when Belarus got $260m (£176m) in outstanding transit
fees.
Earlier, Russia cut gas supplies to Belarus by 30% after Belarus failed to settle debts of $200m (£135m).
The dispute has the potential to affect 6.25% of gas consumption by the EU.
Please visit the link provided for the complete story.
Source
Not for the first time in recent years Belarus is engaging in a face-off with Russia over energy supplies.
This new brinkmanship has arisen as a result of Russia imposing price rises last year for gas supplied to Belarus. The Belarusian govt. has simply
ignored the price rise, leaving Russia $200 million short — with the result that Russia yesterday announced it was cutting supplies by 30%.
Now the President of Belarus is trying to kick its neighbour in the teeth by cutting off Russian supplies to Europe, which is, apparently, illegal.
Only Lithuania, Germany and Poland will be hit, and Russia has stated it can bypass Belarus by supplying Europe through Ukraine. Nevertheless in the
short term questions will still be raised over the reliability of Russia as a supplier, as European governments have found that Ukraine is also apt to
disrupt supplies to Europe when it suits its agenda.
Enter Nord Stream, the new pipeline designed to supply Germany (and beyond) from the Russian mainland directly via the Baltic. Construction began just
a couple of months ago, and is due for completion in 2011-12.
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/aa121d17f3b1.png[/atsimg]
Russia claims it is a purely commercial venture that will be mutually beneficial. They would like Western Europe to see the project as the answer to
doubts over Russia's ability to act as a reliable supplier. Not everyone is convinced:
European dependence on Russian energy is already heavy and the pipeline expands dependence. Opponents have seen the pipeline as a move by Russia
to bypass traditional transit countries (currently Ukraine, Slovakia, Czech Republic, Belarus and Poland).
Some transit countries are concerned that a long-term plan of the Kremlin is to attempt to exert political influence on them by threatening their gas
supply without affecting supplies to Western Europe. The fears are strengthened by the fact that Russia has refused to ratify the Energy Charter
Treaty.
Critics of Nord Stream say that Europe could become dangerously dependent on Russian natural gas, particularly since Russia could face problems
meeting a surge in domestic as well as foreign demand.
Following several cuts to supplies to Ukraine, and further on to Europe on 1 January 2006 and 1 January 2009, as well as foreign policy towards
Eastern Europe, it has been noted that the distribution of gas can be used as a political tool from the Russian state through Gazprom, which it
owns.
In April 2006 Radosław Sikorski, then Poland's defence minister, currently the foreign minister, compared the project to the infamous 1939
Nazi-Soviet Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact.
Source
So
both the current transit countries and the European Union are potentially threatened by this project. So who's funding the project?
...70% will be from external financing by banks...
(Source as above)
Has that got your cogs turning? If you want to go the whole hog, *unknown* globalist bankers might not be averse to states, and even entire global
regions having energy security reduced, and thus more open to the creation of cataclysmic crises. After all, they'd never let a good crisis go to
waste...
On the other hand maybe it's the solution to the transit problem, and will actually
improve energy security.
New pipelines providing gas from non-Russian sources are being planned, though
interestingly not on a sufficient scale to cancel Europe's overwhelming dependence on Russian gas.
But this still begs the question: can Russia be trusted to use Gazprom as a purely economic enterprise? Or will it also be used as a
political
tool, potentially even as an instrument for blackmail?
[link to source article added]
[edit on 22/6/10 by pause4thought]