ATS's Anti-Disinformation Club. A Call For: ATS Whistle Blowers.

reply to post by Esoteric Teacher


Does it have a buffet?

Where do we sign up?

reply to post by LightWonder


YES!!!! I made the list!!!!

So the author of that list believes I have violated the patriot act? I wish he went to the trouble to explain why these people are terrobloggers.

It says right in the video "YOU HAVE TO BE THE JUDGE" and then offers no argument.

????

reply to post by Esoteric Teacher


Well,I read your post and after careful thought about what you tried to express,I came to a conclusion.

This guy would be proud of you.

reply to post by LightWonder


Is this FredMcWoozy a real member name? He is kind of pushing the bounds for T&C isn't he?
Either way he doesn't like olddragger, he listed him on both pages.

That is just a messed up video, man. To go on youtube and state that those members of ATS are paid disinfo agents and cointel is pretty dirty in this dullards opinion.

By the way OP, you kept asking about a fetish for the truth--well I have fetishes but I'm gonna leave it at that.

Besides truth, I think you also have a fetish for anagrams.



ETA: That dude FredMcWoozy was banned. Thus his revenge act I guess.

[edit on 18/5/2010 by Chamberf=6]

Originally posted by LightWonder
He calls him self FredMcWoozy.

Heres his youtube channel with his video Terror-O-Bloggers.

He claims to know who is COINTELPRO, DISINFO, PAID BLOGGERS, etc.

www.youtube.com...

EDIT TO ADD:

look at all the names on there. That is quite some claims he is making!

Southern Guardian made the list as did WeedWhacker.

WhatUKno claims to be running for public office somewhere but I couldn't find what he was talking about and gave up after a few minutes researching.

He's chilled his postings quite abit.

Knowledge is power?

Life is too short to waste on somethings (or people.)

Thanks for the heads up!

Although, pond scum makes itself obvious.

reply to post by Oneolddude


I absolutley love humor. i think it is a requirement of reality, truth be told.

STAR!!

Outstanding, hilarious!
When i get some time i'm going to transcribe that here on this thread for no other reason than to read it carefully to see how much sensible logic it contains.

Thanks for sharing that!

Originally posted by Chamberf=6

By the way OP, you kept asking about a fetish for the truth--well I have fetishes but I'm gonna leave it at that.

Besides truth, I think you also have a fetish for anagrams.

I don't think i have a fetish for anagrams so much as i have a fetish for the truth.

i just happen to locate some truth inside your languages anagrams.

the words are our tools.
we are not the word's tools.

please take the time to re-evaluate the possibility that perhaps we share some internal mechanisms which seem to be encoding and encrypting our words, perhaps with subconscious opinion, perhaps with deeper molecular subquantum feedback, natural echo of sorts. i'm in the same boat you are, seeking compliance with the truth.

reply to post by Esoteric Teacher


Does this mean you are promoting this video as some type of truth?

Being as I am on the list, I am really curious but I got lost in all the anagrams.

reply to post by K J Gunderson


i think i have supplied some interesting examples of how certain bazzar anagrams seem to coincide with phrase or terms.

if we are going to contribute to the creation of this phenomenon, aren't we permitted to know about it?

[edit on 19-5-2010 by Esoteric Teacher]

Originally posted by Esoteric Teacher
reply to post by K J Gunderson

 

i think i have supplied some interesting examples of how certain bazzar anagrams seem to coincide with phrase or terms.

if we are going to contribute to the creation of this phenomenon, aren't we permitted to know about it?

Uh yeah, sure. My question is though - are you pushing this list for that banned member? Are you claiming he was on to something?

anagramical information:

Geographical Interpritations

Reprinting A Archaeologist Pit

Oceanographer: It Rating Pi List



___________________________________________________

again, same identical letters. do we see possible truisms within?

Normal Average Boring

Among Navigable Error

Rev Lob: Ignore Anagram

Anagram Boiler Govern

Noble Or Anagram Giver

Anagram Noble Re-Vigor
_________________________________________________________


Curious sidenote:

After my retirement from the Airforce i was stunned to learn that all the information my government had collected on me during my service (including my dna) was shared with LOCKHEED MARTIN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES.

Why does corporate america require my dna, and all military records?

Who can account for a nearly a fifth of the world economy dissapearing in the last decade?

What technologies currently exist?

Who controls the flow of information?
Why?


[edit on 19-5-2010 by Esoteric Teacher]

FACT: The following phrases use the same identical letters:

BRENDAN FRASER
---------------------
BARF NEAR NERDS

I think I'm on to something here...

[edit on 19-5-2010 by JohnnyTHSeed]

Originally posted by Esoteric Teacher
anagramical information:

Geographical Interpritations

Reprinting A Archaeologist Pit

Oceanographer: It Rating Pi List

Does it not matter to you that you often use miss-spelled words in order to demonstrate these truisms?
It seems to me that the connections you are making are quite a bit easier to make when you stop paying attention to how words are supposed to be spelled.


[edit on 19-5-2010 by K J Gunderson]

[edit on 19-5-2010 by K J Gunderson]

Holy Ancient Sight Go Test Lie.
Eighty Eight Constellations
Total Is Only Highest Genetic
Tech Engine, It Loyalist Ghost

__________________________________________________
Relentless Linguistic Tacticians
Galactic Itellect Insist Sunrise
Calculating Scientists, I Listener
_________________________________________________

Feds In Monitoring A: A.T.S.

I SEND: A.F. MONITORING A.T.S.

DISINFORMATION AGENTS
___________________________________________________

Peace Extended, Coexist
Exceeded Expectations?
Encoded exact XI Tepees
Encoded exact XIs' Tepee
Encoded exact Six Tepee


[edit on 19-5-2010 by Esoteric Teacher]

So......


this is just random nonsense that the mods have not gotten to yet?

Originally posted by K J Gunderson

Originally posted by Esoteric Teacher
anagramical information:

Geographical Interpritations

Reprinting A Archaeologist Pit

Oceanographer: It Rating Pi List

Does it not matter to you that you often use miss-spelled words in order to demonstrate these truisms?
It seems to me that the connections you are making are quite a bit easier to make when you stop paying attention to how words are supposed to be spelled.

SPELLED ACCORDING TO WHOM?

AND FURTHERMORE , WHAT SOCIAL CLASS OWNED COMMUNICATIONS FOR GENERATIONS? (not to mention what was written in the history books)

WHO WAS LITERATE?

commoners and peasants?

or .....

The Ruling Classes and Organized Religions' scribes?

Why is there two "F's" in the word: :Traffic?

what is the necessity of using two F's in the word, other than an excuse to kill more trees for more paper we used to clump unnecissary redundancies together on paper?

I Bet you think LAS VEGAS only means THE MEADOWS in the spanish language?

And has no correlation nor any connection whatsoever with:

LOSS VAGUE GUESS

think there is far less truth in this thread than any other on ATS?

i'm sorry for the typos.

why not address the familiarities, rather than pointing out the fact there was an i where you wanted/expected an e?

did social engineering exist before you did, in your reality?

whether the keywords are spelled according to spelling, or pronunciation, or mixed, results are repeatedly, consistantly, again and again, reproduced.

[edit on 19-5-2010 by Esoteric Teacher]

Originally posted by K J Gunderson
So......


this is just random nonsense that the mods have not gotten to yet?

WOW!

Thanks for spending the time it took to write this contribution!

To think how well spent that time was.

thanks for your input.

Originally posted by K J Gunderson
So......


this is just random nonsense that the mods have not gotten to yet?

Got a problem, complaint, suggestion?

www.abovetopsecret.com...

NUNS SEND MAJOR NOTES

JUST RANDOM NONSENSE

MODS SENT ONE JARS NUNS



disclaimer:
* please play again

[edit on 19-5-2010 by Esoteric Teacher]

reply to post by Esoteric Teacher


Do you think it is at all possible, EsotericTeacher, that you might be subjectively perceiving a pattern in the anagrams? I don't see the relationship between some of the phrases, or attach any special meaninfulness to them, and from my perception of the tone of your thread.......... you DO see some sort of meaningfulness.

Consider the following:

The following phrases use the same letters:


ESOTERIC TEACHER

Theocracies Tree
Reteaches Erotic
Teachers Coterie
Cheaters Coterie
Reteach Coteries
Eateries Crochet
Earthiest Coerce
Hesitate Coercer
A Screechier Tote
A Cheesier Cotter
A Cheeriest Recto

ARGENTUS

Age Turns
Gear Nuts
Rage Nuts
Great Sun
Great Nus
Sage Runt
Ear Stung
Sea Grunt
Eat Rungs
Grant Use
Angst Rue
Gnat User

reply to post by argentus


I Tore Each Secret
Esoteric Teacher

did you see the Patrick Stewart anagram Star Trek Cap Wit?

he was the actor who played a Star Trek Captain.

No noticable connection that is either acknowledgible or reckognizable to you?

Do you know all the variables invovled in the construction of communication?

I'm open minded to possibilities that may exist.

thank you for the contribution, and yes, i have considered what you suggested as thouroughly as i am currently able to do.

...... subjectively perceiving ......

Who has set the example available that demonstrates perception without subjectivity? Which of the senses we have to use did not come from subjectivity?

define subjectivity without perception?
define perception without subjectivity?

Main Entry: 1sub·jec·tive
Pronunciation: \(ˌ)səb-ˈjek-tiv\
Function: adjective
Date: 15th century
1 : of, relating to, or constituting a subject: as a obsolete : of, relating to, or characteristic of one that is a subject especially in lack of freedom of action or in submissiveness b : being or relating to a grammatical subject; especially : nominative
2 : of or relating to the essential being of that which has substance, qualities, attributes, or relations
3 a : characteristic of or belonging to reality as perceived rather than as independent of mind : phenomenal — compare objective 1b b : relating to or being experience or knowledge as conditioned by personal mental characteristics or states
4 a (1) : peculiar to a particular individual : personal (2) : modified or affected by personal views, experience, or background b : arising from conditions within the brain or sense organs and not directly caused by external stimuli c : arising out of or identified by means of one's perception of one's own states and processes — compare objective 1c
5 : lacking in reality or substance : illusory

What possible perception remains after i divorce my sensory input and all my prior experiences?

I'm not sure what it is you expect, or what it is you may be accusing (lack of a better word) me of?


[edit on 19-5-2010 by Esoteric Teacher]