It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by kozmo
Originally posted by Ziltoid_the_Omniscient
Try google before your start making ridiculous claims.
From the Pulitzer Prize winning site politifact.com
And MY sources get questioned??? Now, I'm just wondering... were the same people on the Pulitzer committee the same ones on the Nobel Peace comittee?
Well, I guess that just comes down to what you think a promise is.
Originally posted by treemanx
Originally posted by Southern Guardian
Originally posted by treemanx
I have defended Bush in the past, but he has done to much for me to defend him any longer.
And exactly what was that might I ask?
No, actually, you may not. I wont contribute to the further derailment of this thread.
Originally posted by kozmo
No wonder he has spent nearly $2Million dollars to seal any and every imaginable record. It really makes you wonder what else he is hiding.
1 Note: Birthers claim that Obama has spent "millions" of dollars defending all the birther claims. As shown in this chart, Obama's personal (or campaign) attorneys have appeared only in a very very few number of cases
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
So, this thread is about Obama being called a professor or not? Yeah, I remember posting about that a couple years ago. Yeah, here's a thread:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Here's what the school where he taught has to say:
www.law.uchicago.edu...
From 1992 until his election to the U.S. Senate in 2004, Barack Obama served as a professor in the Law School. He was a Lecturer from 1992 to 1996. He was a Senior Lecturer from 1996 to 2004, during which time he taught three courses per year. Senior Lecturers are considered to be members of the Law School faculty and are regarded as professors, although not full-time or tenure-track. The title of Senior Lecturer is distinct from the title of Lecturer, which signifies adjunct status. Like Obama, each of the Law School's Senior Lecturers has high-demand careers in politics or public service, which prevent full-time teaching. Several times during his 12 years as a professor in the Law School, Obama was invited to join the faculty in a full-time tenure-track position, but he declined.
Everything else in that source is just one person's word that he heard from someone else.
I can't believe the examiner is using a blog that sourced another blog that sourced the first blog. Now, that's FUNNY!
Originally posted by Southern Guardian
Obviously you won't because you know yourself that it would be completely hypocritical over your arguments towards Obama.
'Gut and run' as I say.
Originally posted by treemanx
Originally posted by GorehoundLarry
reply to post by treemanx
Are you really disagreeing with the fact that Bush is a homophobic mass murdering creep?
Then I guess that says it all folks. lol
I don't believe Bush to have been any better than our sitting President. I have defended Bush in the past, but he has done to much for me to defend him any longer. Obama and Bush are brothers, or didn't you see kosmos avatar? .
Originally posted by kozmo
WTF!?!? Perhaps you have a reading comprehension issue or short-term memory loss... But the thread was about Mr. Obama's ability to be honest. It focuses on a claim that he held a position that he did not, in fact possess. It was also to point out a pattern of lies - such as how he surrendered his Law License - which none of you liberal apologists will touch with a ten foot pole - preferring to harp over and over about the source of the first claim!
Originally posted by kozmo
Originally posted by Southern Guardian
Obviously you won't because you know yourself that it would be completely hypocritical over your arguments towards Obama.
'Gut and run' as I say.
No! At least treemanx
Originally posted by kozmo
Originally posted by VintageEnvy
Why would he need to surrender his law license, nothing has been proven here. As said hundreds of times already this is a none deal.
He ALREADY surrendered his Law License - in 2008! Because he didn't want to have to answer to the charges being levied against him - because he knew they were true and there was no way h could allow that to see the light of day.
But, what am I thinking... You're an Obama supporter... So you already know ALL about that and you're completely comfortable with it - apparently!
Why must we argue over who's right and who's wrong
Originally posted by kozmo
Also a great many of you apparently see only in black and white, no shades of grey. And finally, a great many of you have scoffed at the "Sources", not because the sources are wrong, but because it flies in the face of your political ideology. OK, cool... whatever.
Originally posted by kozmo
Now, any intellectually honest person would have to admit that when there is smoke, there is likely fire. There is smoke around Obama - a TON of it! And when I see reports like these, some dots start getting connected. So I apologize if it offends a great many of you who are too busy idolizing the man instead of employing the good sense that God gave you!
Originally posted by Southern Guardian
Originally posted by kozmo
Originally posted by Southern Guardian
Obviously you won't because you know yourself that it would be completely hypocritical over your arguments towards Obama.
'Gut and run' as I say.
No! At least treemanx
Treemanx decided to run away from owning up to what he said. As for you, Im waiting for your admission that you hold no credible sources for the accusation that Obama lied or that he spent millions. Im waiting for that admission.