It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Aeons
To quote a woman I know who is from Saudi Arabia
She is in the West, and she is a modern woman.
When she's back there she does what her owner tells her to do.
She has a husband. But she is not MARRIED. She has a contract, and that contract is not applicable here. She has an owner, and when she is here she dresses accordingly.
This woman isn't some young rebellious girl. She's a grandmother.
The men IMPOSE this. They are OWNERS of women.
That is what the burqua means. It is a sign of submission. And it is culturally unacceptable here.
Originally posted by skajkingdom
Originally posted by operation mindcrime
reply to post by blueorder
For the Muslim wife to get outside, her only option is to wear that damn burqa.
What the frell are you talking about?
Why do you people even speak without the least shred of knowledge? It is NOT anywhere in Islam that the man shall tell his wife what is she to wear, or if she is to wear niqab, burqa, or whatever.
When will you get this?
The order to COVER the body is in the Qur'an and it is directed to both men and women - if the woman wants to OBEY GOD then she will cover herself (this doesnt mean burqa, but cover "intimate" body parts and not expose other parts which may be deemed as erotic).
It is NOT ALLOWED for a man to command her wife if she will do this or not. It is FOR HER BENEFIT before God, not before man.
I am muslim, and I don't go around commanding my wife what is she to wear - she CAN READ for herself, she can decide whether she will obey God or not - if she sins, IT IS HER SIN, not mine.
In the Day of Judgement we will all be alone with OURSELVES and OUR deeds.
[edit on 3/31/2010 by skajkingdom]
Originally posted by pujols5
reply to post by Aeons
Na, but i figured to let you know that you are an ignorant person speaking out of your a**. See ya later miss,
Originally posted by Unity_99
reply to post by operation mindcrime
It is CHILD ABUSE, for my children to see women dressed in a shroud, this is ABUSE of women, and its abuse of my children to see this ugly repression modelled in front of their eyes. I love all people, but ALL "traditions", no. Children need to see equality between men and women being modeled and demonstrated at all times.
This is something that needs to be dealt with in all "free" and "equal" countries.
Originally posted by oozyism
Originally posted by Unity_99
reply to post by operation mindcrime
It is CHILD ABUSE, for my children to see women dressed in a shroud, this is ABUSE of women, and its abuse of my children to see this ugly repression modelled in front of their eyes. I love all people, but ALL "traditions", no. Children need to see equality between men and women being modeled and demonstrated at all times.
This is something that needs to be dealt with in all "free" and "equal" countries.
What if the women wanna wear those types of cloths?
Originally posted by Aeons
Originally posted by pujols5
reply to post by Aeons
Na, but i figured to let you know that you are an ignorant person speaking out of your a**. See ya later miss,
Finally figured out I'm female eh? Good for you.
Which raises the possibility that a woman actually talked to me about this - because she would be more likely to talk to a woman about it than a man.
So sad - my ass is smarter than you.
Originally posted by antonia
Wow, didn't take long for the racists to come out. Glad to know Nazism is still alive in Europe.
As for the U.S, I'd be more worried about the cartel trying to kill me than a bunch of ladies in Burqas.
This is just grandstanding. Frankly, I think it prohibits the free expression of religion for those who wish to practice it. That's wrong but, hey as long as your happy right? Who cares about the rights of other people?
[edit on 31-3-2010 by antonia]
Originally posted by oozyism
What if the women wanna wear those types of cloths?
Originally posted by justinsweatt
This is the kind of government intrusion that I find so disturbing. I believe in religious freedom and there are several women in the Muslim faith who do not have a problem wearing the veil. This is ridiculous on Belgium's part and it will do nothing more than build a solid "us against them". Any time you demonize something, it's just going to make people want to to it more. Look at prohibition as an example of that. This is stupid.
Originally posted by karl 12
Originally posted by tigpoppa
belgium is one of the more radical european countries on par with France. This is yet another example of their religious intolerance.
Can you explain why muslim countries such as Tunisia and Turkey have also banned it?