It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Lloyd Pye is an authority on the Intervention Theory of origins, of both life and humans. He bases his writings on over 40 years of research experience.
Science is, on the whole, as full of crap as the proverbial Christmas turkey. Very little of what they say, or pretend to know, is reliably true because so many of their pontifications are based on blatantly wrong information.
My special area of interest is human origins, and I’ve collected, and continue to collect, wonderfully convincing evidence for the argument that humans did not evolve on Earth but were genetically created to live and work as slaves and servants of superior beings sojourning here for thousands of years.
I do what I do, the way I do it, because I’m no different than scientists were when they saw and understood a clearer vision of truth than religionists had. I and others like me do the same thing now.
We know we are closer to the truth than mainstream science because our theories aren’t structured around their flagrantly incorrect baseline realities. That’s a contentious statement, but it’s true. We look back at the people living on Earth 300 years ago and we howl at their level of ignorance.
With the speed at which we can access information today, I think it’s safe to say people only 100 years from now will look back at what we “know” and will gasp with shock at the profound depth of our ignorance. That’s why I called my book about these matters Everything You Know Is Wrong. The most important of it really is wrong.
Three things science will ultimately claim as their own are a trio that today they refuse to take seriously. Any of the three will topple the fragile edifice they have constructed to explain the world as we currently perceive it.
(1) UFOs don’t exist.
(2) Aliens in those UFOs don’t exist.
(3) Hominoids such as yeti and bigfoot don’t exist.
And why don’t they exist?
Because scientists insist they don’t. Why do they insist? Because the undeniable reality of any of those three would mean that neither science nor humanity is what it is cracked up to be. Scientists would be exposed in all their buffoonery, and humanity would be seen as having no roots or existence in the flowchart of ancient life on Earth. Our world as we know it would never be the same.
Three things science will ultimately claim as their own are a trio that today they refuse to take seriously. Any of the three will topple the fragile edifice they have constructed to explain the world as we currently perceive it.
(1) UFOs don’t exist.
(2) Aliens in those UFOs don’t exist.
(3) Hominoids such as yeti and bigfoot don’t exist.
And why don’t they exist? Because scientists insist they don’t. Why do they insist? Because the undeniable reality of any of those three would mean that neither science nor humanity is what it is cracked up to be. Scientists would be exposed in all their buffoonery, and humanity would be seen as having no roots or existence in the flowchart of ancient life on Earth. Our world as we know it would never be the same.
Paracast Archives
April 8, 2007 — Lloyd Pye and Lorraine Warren
Explore the strange tale of the mysterious “Starchild” with Lloyd Pye. Is this skull from an alien/human hybrid, a hoax, or some sort of strange deformity? You’ll also hear some frightening tales of hauntings from renowned ghost hunter Lorraine Warren.
Three things science will ultimately claim as their own are a trio that today they refuse to take seriously. Any of the three will topple the fragile edifice they have constructed to explain the world as we currently perceive it.
(1) UFOs don’t exist.
(2) Aliens in those UFOs don’t exist.
(3) Hominoids such as yeti and bigfoot don’t exist.
And why don’t they exist?
Because scientists insist they don’t. Why do they insist? Because the undeniable reality of any of those three would mean that neither science nor humanity is what it is cracked up to be. Scientists would be exposed in all their buffoonery, and humanity would be seen as having no roots or existence in the flowchart of ancient life on Earth. Our world as we know it would never be the same.
Originally posted by Kandinsky
He isn't in a position to make any claims about science.
Originally posted by Kandinsky
Science doesn't claim UFOs don't exist. Science makes no claims about the occupants of UFOs because they are UFOs....Unidentified.
Originally posted by Kandinsky
As far as I can see those are the only two facts he claims here. The rest is typical pseudo-science BS.
Originally posted by Kandinsky
He was interviewed on the Paracast and, Oh Boy! His level of thinking is awful. I'd link it, but can't find the show in the archives. He lasted half a show and shuffled away. If I can find it, I'll link it.
Originally posted by Kandinsky
Spacevisitor, This isn't an attack on you.
Originally posted by Kandinsky
Lloyd Pye is likely just a hoaxing attention-seeker in the UFO world.
Can you tell me why you think that he is not in a position to make any claims about science?
That’s precisely the point, because do those scientists think then that those UFO’s are flying by themselves?
Therefore does it not become time now and is it not their task then that Science starts to ask themselves the 10 million dollar questions;
1. Who are those occupants?
2. Where do they come from?
3. What is the technology they are using to come here, so that we perhaps can benefit from that technology for ourselves?
4. And why are they here?
Originally posted by Kandinsky
reply to post by spacevisitor
Firstly, it was not an attack on you.
Originally posted by Kandinsky
reply to post by spacevisitor
Can you tell me why you think that he is not in a position to make any claims about science?
To publish books and articles about the failures of science, one should have a reasonable understanding of the scientific processes.
Darwin Was Wrong, Scientists Argue By Lillian Kwon|Christian Post Reporter.
Darwin was wrong, a group of scientists argued at a conference in southern California.
Scientists presented evidence over the weekend refuting Charles Darwin's theory of evolution on many levels – including fossil record, natural selection and the origin of man – and his works in geology and other science areas.
"Natural selection happens but it does not do what Darwin needed it to do," said geneticist Dr. John Sanford. "Darwin built a worldview that has come to be the governing paradigm of the intellectual community; that worldview is now collapsing in the face of new advances in science."
Originally posted by Kandinsky
Pye's approach is to present a conclusion and look for evidence to support it. When the evidence doesn't support his conclusions, he criticises the evidence instead of reevaluating his conclusion.
Writer John Anthony West and Boston University geologist Robert Schoch contend that weathering of the Member II layers indicates that the Sphinx was built between 5000 and 7000 BC.
Originally posted by Kandinsky
A good example is his 'Starchild Skull.' In spite of the independent findings that identify the skull as completely terrestrial in origin...he insists it's alien.
Ancient Bone Skull Baffles Science
Is It Human? Is It Alien? Is it BOTH?
www.starchildproject.com...
Is the Starchild Skull a deformity?
Since investigations began in 1999, multiple illnesses, ailments, and deformation processes have been suggested to explain the appearance and composition of the Starchild skull. Even Lloyd Pye, now the Project's research coordinator, originally and reflexively believed that it must be some sort of deformity.
Each of these suggestions has been taken seriously, and conscientious research has been undertaken to try and find a simple medical reason for the anomalous skull. At this time, no known medical condition or cultural practice has been found that can explain the Starchild skull.
Originally posted by Kandinsky
UFO reports are not all the same. Reports involve different shapes, colors, speeds, behaviour. Some are reported as 'nuts and bolts' craft. Others are orbs. Even more are unusual lights in the night sky. Different nationalities report different features of sightings.
Amongst all reported sightings, we cannot know which ones are misidentified, which ones are hoaxes and which ones are part of the genuine UFO phenomena.
If we don't know what a UFO is...how can we answer any of your questions?
If a UFO flashes past witnesses or leaves a radar trace at several 1000 mp/h, how can we answer those questions?
Darwin Was Wrong, Scientists Argue By Lillian Kwon|Christian Post Reporter.
Darwin was wrong, a group of scientists argued at a conference in southern California. Scientists presented evidence over the weekend refuting Charles Darwin's theory of evolution on many levels – including fossil record, natural selection and the origin of man – and his works in geology and other science areas.
"Natural selection happens but it does not do what Darwin needed it to do," said geneticist Dr. John Sanford. "Darwin built a worldview that has come to be the governing paradigm of the intellectual community; that worldview is now collapsing in the face of new advances in science."
Originally posted by downunderET
The lack of evidence, I just cringe when people say "where's the UFO evidence"
Everybody knows the hard evidence is six levels below Wright Patterson Air Force base.
Pye also points out that Darwin' theory of evolution is false. Monkeys have 48 chromosomes and humans have 46, now you can't just lose 2 chromosomes, it has to be by DNA manipulation.
Where's Zacharia Sitchin when you need him.
Originally posted by davesidious
Wow. I didn't know about this guy until I read this thread. I just had a quick glance over his Wikipedia article, and the guy is clearly a massive joke.
How can anyone take him seriously? He's an absolute idiot.
Originally posted by Kandinsky
His Starchild Skull has been hawked around for nearly 20 years IIRC and as every doctor identified it as congenital defect so he accused them of lying. He had the DNA proven to be human in origin....maternal and paternal...called them deniers. Still to this day, his websites (he has three last time I looked) ask for donations towards having the skull analysed. That damn skull has been analysed at least twice...once by a reputable forensic scientist...once by a lab that only exists in reference to the skull.
Originally posted by spacevisitor
Originally posted by davesidious
Wow. I didn't know about this guy until I read this thread. I just had a quick glance over his Wikipedia article, and the guy is clearly a massive joke.
How can anyone take him seriously? He's an absolute idiot.
You did not know this guy until you read this thread, you just had a quick glance over his Wikipedia article, and because of that you come to the conclusion that the guy is clearly a massive joke, then you wonder how anyone can take him seriously and you even claim that he's an absolute idiot.
Well, I didn't know you until you post this reply, I just had a quick glance over your extended profile page, so how would you think about me when I would say here that because of that I did come to the conclusion that you are clearly a massive joke.
That I wonder myself how anyone can take you seriously and that I would say that you are an absolute idiot.
How would you like that for a change?
Originally posted by Kandinsky
reply to post by spacevisitor
Darwin Was Wrong, Scientists Argue By Lillian Kwon|Christian Post Reporter.
Darwin was wrong, a group of scientists argued at a conference in southern California. Scientists presented evidence over the weekend refuting Charles Darwin's theory of evolution on many levels – including fossil record, natural selection and the origin of man – and his works in geology and other science areas.
"Natural selection happens but it does not do what Darwin needed it to do," said geneticist Dr. John Sanford. "Darwin built a worldview that has come to be the governing paradigm of the intellectual community; that worldview is now collapsing in the face of new advances in science."
A group of scientists can agree that Darwin was wrong. Science allows for a consensus and couldn't exist without it. The consensus is overwhelmingly in support of evolution.
The Theory of Evolution is, arguably, no longer Darwin's. It exists in a way that is not dependent on any single area of science. It's supported by evidence from inter-disciplinary subjects within science. Each strand and example can be cross-referenced and substantiated. Natural selection and speciation is evident in small contemporary samples of moth, butterfly, worm and bacteria. It's also evident against greater time-frames of the fossil record.
The origin of man is indicated by the fossil record and comparison to other contemporary mammals, monkeys and primates...
This illustration offers a general idea of the phylogroups that have led to our existence...
This illustration shows the evolutionary path we've taken from our our distant ancestors...all supported by what we've learned from the fossil record....
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/13b6cf288ea9.jpg[/atsimg]
From the remnants and bones of our hominid ancestors, we can identify even more differences and stages that led to us....homo sapiens sapiens...
Pye knows nothing about the science behind the Theory of Evolution. He probably knows less than high school kids studying science. I won't comment on the 'Christianpost' link.
If you're trying to find answers to the UFO phenomena, Pye doesn't have them. Keep looking like the rest of us
Stop spreading disinformation about Lloyd Pye.
More BS and begging from Pye
As of now, the geneticist feels he has isolated the Starchild’s mitochondrial DNA, which was also found in 2003. He also feels he has started recovering the nuclear DNA, which could not be accomplished with the technology of 2003. And understand that if he does recover nuclear DNA, we will be ready to prove what we said all along we could prove: that the Starchild’s genetic profile is significantly different from a human’s. At that point all we’ll need is the money needed to recover the entire genome, and money should readily flow toward a project with such enormous financial potential.