It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
CHAPTER ONE: War Is A Racket
War is a racket. It always has been. It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives.
A racket is best described, I believe, as something that is not what it seems to the majority of the people. Only a small "inside" group knows what it is about. It is conducted for the benefit of the very few, at the expense of the very many. Out of war a few people make huge fortunes.
In the World War [I] a mere handful garnered the profits of the conflict. At least 21,000 new millionaires and billionaires were made in the United States during the World War. That many admitted their huge blood gains in their income tax returns. How many other war millionaires falsified their tax returns no one knows. [Please note these are 1935 U.S. dollars. To adjust for inflation, multiply all figures X 10 or more]
How many of these war millionaires shouldered a rifle? How many of them dug a trench? How many of them knew what it meant to go hungry in a rat-infested dug-out? How many of them spent sleepless, frightened nights, ducking shells and shrapnel and machine gun bullets? How many of them were wounded or killed in battle?
So you want to enjoy all of the freedoms that America has to offer, you just don't want to fight for them? You'd rather other people sacrifice themselves on your behalf? That's just lovely...
Originally posted by sgrrsh26
I am just curious how many people feel the same way I do about this. I will not fight. I will go to jail.
They say we are the children who will lead the future. I personally believe now is the time for change, and we are the ones who can accomplish it. We need to let our fathers know that their ways of the past do not, and never have worked.
Peace and love to all.
[edit on 5-1-2010 by sgrrsh26]
Originally posted by sgrrsh26
I agree I was going to say what you said but i thought it would take the meaning out of my post.
If we were attacked it would be a consideration.
so i should say, "under the right circumstances"
but again, this insight I feel takes away from the meaning of my post.
Originally posted by Plasma applicator
Originally posted by sezsue
I had been interested in Iraq and Saddam Hussein since the 80's, and had been monitoring the situation in Iraq with the weapons inspectors for a long time.
The *weapons of mass destruction* theory didn't ring true to me because of what I knew about the situation. When discussing the situation with people I knew, I told them I didn't think we should be in Iraq, because I didn't think they had any WMD.
Couldn’t resist.
So what do you think? The Iranians and the Kurds gassed themselves? Oh I know. it was propaganda. Nobody got gassed and we didnt give Iraq weapons during the Iran Iraq conflict.
Therein lies the rub: According to Scott Ritter, who spent seven years in Iraq with the UNSCOM weapons inspection teams performing acidly detailed investigations into Iraq's weapons program, no such capability exists. Iraq simply does not have weapons of mass destruction, and does not have threatening ties to international terrorism. Therefore, no premise for a war in Iraq exists. Considering the American military lives and the Iraqi civilian lives that will be spent in such an endeavor, not to mention the deadly regional destabilization that will ensue, such a baseless war must be avoided at all costs.
Ritter noted explicitly that Iraq, of course, had these weapons at one time - he spent seven years there tracking them down. At the outset, said Ritter, they lied about it. They failed to declare the existence of their biological and nuclear programs after the Gulf War, and declared less than 50% of their chemical and missile stockpiles. They hid everything they could, as cleverly as they could.
After the first lie, Ritter and his team refused to believe anything else they said. For the next seven years, the meticulously tracked down every bomb, every missile, every factory designed to produce chemical, biological and nuclear weaponry. They went to Europe and found the manufacturers who sold them the equipment. They got the invoices and shoved them into the faces of Iraqi officials. They tracked the shipping of these materials and cross-referenced this data against the invoices. They lifted the foundations of buildings destroyed in the Gulf War to find wrecked research and development labs, at great risk to their lives, and used the reams of paperwork there to cross-reference what they had already cross-referenced. Everything they found was later destroyed in place.
After a while, the Iraqis knew Ritter and his people were robotically thorough. Fearing military retaliation if they hid anything, the Iraqis instituted a policy of full disclosure. Still, Ritter believed nothing they said and tracked everything down. By the time he was finished, Ritter was mortally sure that he and his UNSCOM investigators had stripped Iraq of 90-95% of all their weapons of mass destruction.
What of the missing 10%? Is this not still a threat? Ritter believes that the ravages of the Gulf War accounted for a great deal of the missing material, as did the governmental chaos caused by sanctions. The Iraqis' policy of full disclosure, also, was of a curious nature that deserved all of Ritter's mistrust. Fearing the aforementioned attacks, Iraq instituted a policy of destroying whatever Ritter's people had not yet found, and then pretending it never existed in the first place. Often, the dodge failed to fool UNSCOM. That some of it did also accounts for a portion of that missing 10%.
Craig Murray, the rector of the University of Dundee in Scotland and until 2004 the UK's ambassador to Uzbekistan, said the CIA not only relied on confessions gleaned through extreme torture, it sent terror war suspects to Uzbekistan as part of its extraordinary rendition program.
"I'm talking of people being raped with broken bottles," he said at a lecture late last month that was re-broadcast by the Real News Network. "I'm talking of people having their children tortured in front of them until they sign a confession. I'm talking of people being boiled alive. And the intelligence from these torture sessions was being received by the CIA, and was being passed on."
Originally posted by Rasputin13
So you want to enjoy all of the freedoms that America has to offer, you just don't want to fight for them? You'd rather other people sacrifice themselves on your behalf? That's just lovely...
Originally posted by sgrrsh26
I am just curious how many people feel the same way I do about this. I will not fight. I will go to jail.
They say we are the children who will lead the future. I personally believe now is the time for change, and we are the ones who can accomplish it. We need to let our fathers know that their ways of the past do not, and never have worked.
Peace and love to all.
[edit on 5-1-2010 by sgrrsh26]
Without any thought as to what kind of threat we could be facing that would require a draft, you have already made up your mind not to participate. I mean no offense, but it's individuals like yourself that are destroying this country. You want it all but you have no concept of sacrifice or how things really work.
Originally posted by hungrydirt
Originally posted by sgrrsh26
I agree I was going to say what you said but i thought it would take the meaning out of my post.
If we were attacked it would be a consideration.
so i should say, "under the right circumstances"
but again, this insight I feel takes away from the meaning of my post.
I stopped reading the thread after I finished reading the above post I have quoted.
If your country was invaded, you would consider answering the call to arms from your nation? This is nothing but a brutally honest confession of cowardice.
If a draft was called, the only reason I would refuse it is if were called to invade Kazakhstan or Madagascar. If your country needs you to fight against a juggernaut like Russia or China, you would curl up in the fetile position and lay there waiting for your family to be destroyed or raped or corralled in to a detention center?
Wow. This country really is doomed.
Originally posted by Rasputin13
Without any thought as to what kind of threat we could be facing that would require a draft, you have already made up your mind not to participate. I mean no offense, but it's individuals like yourself that are destroying this country. You want it all but you have no concept of sacrifice or how things really work.
Originally posted by hungrydirt
I stopped reading the thread after I finished reading the above post I have quoted.
If your country was invaded, you would consider answering the call to arms from your nation? This is nothing but a brutally honest confession of cowardice.
If a draft was called, the only reason I would refuse it is if were called to invade Kazakhstan or Madagascar. If your country needs you to fight against a juggernaut like Russia or China, you would curl up in the fetile position and lay there waiting for your family to be destroyed or raped or corralled in to a detention center?
Wow. This country really is doomed.
Originally posted by sgrrsh26
*****************Let me steer this in another direction. **********************
Lets say Russia for example (since someone here believes it to be this big bad juggernaut), were to attack us on our soil because of our government and military's actions on THEIR soil. Now, you say you will defend, which I agree with 100%, but now your government wants you to go back to their land and FINISH THEM OFF. Now, what do you do??
Use the Russian example,
or just think about our current situation. Because in Reality our government ALLOWED 911 to happen. Whether you believe it is a FAKE flag or not, our security wasn't good enough. And it caused our occupancy in foreign countries.