It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by infinite
reply to post by On the Edge
I find your lack of knowledge disturbing, but you quoted a Bible reference - so that explains numerous things.
The Peace Prize is a worthwhile award, some notable laureates include Martin Luther King Jr, Mother Teresa, 14th Dalai Lama and my political hero - Aung San Suu Kyi.
[edit on 11-12-2009 by infinite]
Yet, a President fighting two wars - without peace in sight within Afghanistan - thinks it is OK to accumulate his ego even more by exploiting a peace prize?
President Obama does not have any sympathetic attitudes towards the Nobel Committee. Another excuse to spread his cult of personality.
No, it is not "their award" it is voted on by the following;
Originally posted by whatukno
If I had won it. I certainly wouldn't turn it down.
Originally posted by infinite
Originally posted by whatukno
If I had won it. I certainly wouldn't turn it down.
I am utterly perplexed.
Are we honestly living in the age of self interest and self gratification? 99% of the human population are not deserving of such prestige or honour - myself is even included in that statistic. I'm certainly not that arrogant
Originally posted by whatukno
So while being mankind's intellectually and evolutionarily superior, according to you I shouldn't deserve the Peace Prize either because I am arrogant about the facts at hand.
What exactly do you think qualifies a person for the Peace Prize?