It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by EMPIRE
First off, who are you? Secondly, are you the guy all the ex-soldiers and vets sent to answer for them? Finally, I don’t have a convoluted thinking process, you and others share this trait.
What, in your view, are the "sides"? I don't do government work any more, so I can't see myself being on their "side".
The sides are the people and the government.
Government vs. populace. Are you seeing other "sides", perhaps? From what I hear, most of the government "muscle" won't even be on their "side". Some, but not most.
Where are you hearing this from? Youtube? Myspace? ATS? Oh I get it, you and private dooper represent all of the vets and ex-soldiers. Got it.
No, I’ll just get on Youtube and watch the rednecks make more vids while NOTHING happens.Better yet, I'll wait for members of the USS PENELOPE to fill me in on the juciest parts. FAIL.
Originally posted by nenothtu
1. You'll need to be more specific in the information you require as to my identity. What is it you're asking for? Name? Address? Family history and blood type? Where I've fought, and who for? A "who are you?" question is just too broad.
2. As much so as you are the guy who the whole government sent to speak for them.
3. I'll wait for you to specify the "convolutions" in my thought processes. Mind if I grab a beer while I wait?
Well, at least we see the same sides forming up. It's a start, I reckon
I hear it from vets and active duty soldiers. Yeah, I get up off my ass and out into the world every now and then. You should try it - it might open your eyes, and untangle your thought processes.
Based on your condescending definition of "rednecks", I must deduce that you are what those "rednecks" call a "tree-huggin', Birkenstock wearin', Granola munchin' hippie".
Based on that I have a better grasp of your utter and complete lack of understanding of human dyamics as bear on the matter of conflict.
I pity you, but damned if I'll stick MY neck out to haul your fat out of the fire. I'm here to protect innocent folks, not willfully ignorant ones.
When it hits, better stay inside, because outside you'll be in a WORLD of hurt. You can huddle in a corner, close your eyes, and put your hands over your ears and chant "NOTHING is happening! NOTHING is happening!" while your world falls apart and realigns itself.
Thanks for the mention of the Penelope. At least I know we're being read! Means a lot to a writer.Ciao, baby
Originally posted by EMPIRE
I pledge allegiance, to the rag, of the Un-United States of America
And to the Plutocracy, for which it stands
One nation, no longer under God
Divisible, with imprisonment and injustice for all.
Can someone help me put my new pledge in my sig?
Who are you…meaning…why am I devoting any energy to anything you’re saying.
2. As much so as you are the guy who the whole government sent to speak for them.
The government hasn’t sent me to do anything which is why you don’t see me supporting the government. You see me supporting logic and reality, not some wacky scheme by those who have nothing much to live or show for.
3. I'll wait for you to specify the "convolutions" in my thought processes. Mind if I grab a beer while I wait?
I’ve already done so. However, it is not my fault if you lack the basic cognitive skills necessary to see this.
Well, at least we see the same sides forming up. It's a start, I reckon
Many posts ago I already said what you guys, the dooms dayers and red necks, said both sides are. However, if you pay close attention, you’ll see that I said the only thing that will happen is people fighting people not people fighting the government...
I hear it from vets and active duty soldiers. Yeah, I get up off my ass and out into the world every now and then. You should try it - it might open your eyes, and untangle your thought processes.
I hear the exact opposite from vets and active duty soldiers. And that’s nice that you get off your backside and into the real world now and then. I’ve been a member of this site for over three years now and only recently made my very first post, so I know what it is like to be in the real world and not tangle up in fantasy.
Based on your condescending definition of "rednecks", I must deduce that you are what those "rednecks" call a "tree-huggin', Birkenstock wearin', Granola munchin' hippie".
Absolutely not my friend, and I don’t have a condescending definition of rednecks.
Based on that I have a better grasp of your utter and complete lack of understanding of human dyamics as bear on the matter of conflict.
Do we need to go into basic psychology, how group think will actually prevent any uprising from happening, and how Maslow’s Heirarchy of Needs will prevent an uprising from happening? Yes, why don’t we just go ahead and go into the understanding of human dynamics and behavior as it relates to conflict. Let us indulge in lizard brain and the fight or flight response of the average American citizen (or soldier if you will.) You’re outgunned here man, move on and talk about something else like your side arm or the latest scope you attached to your bb gun.
I pity you, but damned if I'll stick MY neck out to haul your fat out of the fire. I'm here to protect innocent folks, not willfully ignorant ones.
I thank you for that, and if I saw you in a position of being down and out I would not hesitate to help you out. It simply isn’t in my nature or philosophy to see people hurt and not help them. However, nothing is going to happen, and if something does happen, it won’t be us VS them, but us VS us. They’ll simply sit back and clean up the scraps when they are good and ready.
When it hits, better stay inside, because outside you'll be in a WORLD of hurt. You can huddle in a corner, close your eyes, and put your hands over your ears and chant "NOTHING is happening! NOTHING is happening!" while your world falls apart and realigns itself.
That sounds like something straight out of Alice in Wonderland. Lay off the classics, man.
Thanks for the mention of the Penelope. At least I know we're being read! Means a lot to a writer.Ciao, baby
It looked liked something out of Star Trek, I just had to Google it.
[edit on 6-10-2009 by EMPIRE]
Your assumption is that nothing will happen because folks are too "complacent and weak?" What kind of slack-jawed, lisping panty-waists do you hang around with? Oh. Never mind. This is starting to come together.
It'll probably fit better if you double up the lines and use semicolons such that you have only two or three lines of text.
How would I know why you do what you do? …I was an idealist when I was younger, now I'm just a bitter old cynic.
I see you denying…They too were in denial, and got the surprise of their curtailed lives.
What I HAVE said is that I know which side I'll be on….You may see that as support if you like, but my view is that inactivity is merely support for the opposition, and I won't be party to that.
I hate that I missed that. I suppose we'll just have to press onward then, eh?
I fall among the redneck category. Doomsdayers are just so.... negative. You think that if the balloon went up, the government would just sit it out? How quaint….However, if the government rides in to support either side, well, the unsupported side is most likely going to take exception to that interference.
Contrary to what all the tech savants around here say…They need to bring plenty of batteries, as their opposition will likely resupply off of them.
I've run into those types from time to time as well….Will the dead be any less dead, just because you will it to not be so?
I apologize, then. From the way you were throwing the term out, I assumed it to be used in the manner of an epithet, or perjorative. You might better have used the term "militiamen", but then that too can be taken wrong, eh? The term "redneck" usually carries negative connotations these days.
We can go into that if you like. I'm not entirely unversed in the subject matter, as you appear to assume, going by your use of the term "outgunned here".
I will note that neither groupthink nor Maslowe's Heirarchy have prevented these occurrences in other places, and indeed have at times exacerbated them….Americans have some sort of moral superiority over the remaining denizens of the world who have had to live through it?
My bb gun has only ever had one scope attached to it. Why mess with perfection? I believe in getting it right the first time, wherever possible.
Seeing someone in dire straights, and actually going to help out folks that have consistently refused to get themselves ready for adversity simply because "it couldn't happen" are two entirely different things. Why would anyone risk their neck for someone who won't risk his neck for himself?
Never read the book, so I'm unfamiliar with the allusion. Classics give me heartburn, anyhow.
We're on Google now? I'll have to check that out. EDIT: I googled "uss penelope nenothtu" and got 97 hits, mostly to the ATS Space Opera we're writing, but including your post above. Ain't technology grand when it works?
Originally posted by EMPIRE
reply to post by nenothtu
Your assumption is that nothing will happen because folks are too "complacent and weak?" What kind of slack-jawed, lisping panty-waists do you hang around with? Oh. Never mind. This is starting to come together.
That sounds like something straight out of a Governator movie. Take a look at the average American and you’ll see they are weak and complacent. Approximately 33% are obese, the majority of Americans watch eight hours of TV a day, the majority of Americans are consumers and many Americans are illiterate or functional illiterates which means many Americans most likely lack critical skills. Moreover, take a look at recent history and you’ll see what Americans will fight for…
Nah I’ll bleed over it later. For now I just need to know how to add it to my sig.
That, my friend, has absolutely nothing to do with anything I’ve typed.
If it happened, .... There will never be an uprising that replaces the government and restores the constitution. The people are too fragmented and broken, sorry guy, but this country is F-I-N-I-S-H-E-D.
It is illogical for me to assume that someone of your position represents all ex-soldiers and vets. I don’t see you as support for any cause, nor do I see you as someone galvanizing the troops for some maniacal run at the government. Are you someone who has convictions and willing to articulate them? Yes, I can give you that, but I will not say you represent all vets and ex-soldiers, nor will I say all vets and ex-soldiers speak as you do.
I’d say you fall in both categories because anyone who believes that there will be a new fight pitting the government against the people is most likely a doomsdayer. I mean where do you draw the line. No, the government is not going to ride in and support either side. Their side is not the side of the citizens nor does it entail protecting the best interest of the citizens. If such things were true, we would not be having this exchange right now.
The average American is not prepared to live without technology. The average American is not familiar with how to live off the land. Go to your nearest park and ask twenty people what wild plants are edible, what plants serve medicinal purposes, what insects are high in protein, etc and see what you get. Moreover, the average American would laugh in your face if you told them something similar to what you’re telling me, because many trust the government and can’t think for themselves.
No I’m not in Canada, ... are you and your cohorts who believe it’s patriotic to go down with a sinking ship. By fighting the machine, you’re simply prolonging what will eventually happen—your death, your children’s death and subjugation.
I am using the term because that is the term most applicable to them. I do not see them as militiamen, but if the term redneck is offensive to you, I’ll meet you halfway and refer to them as “so-called militiamen”, will this work?
Let us first address groupthink. ... the people in the video do have a connection with the majority of the government.
Concerning Maslow's Hierarchy, all you need to do is limit the base of the pyramid and everything else goes down the toilet. In order for the government to get troops to do what they normally wouldn’t do, they would start at the bottom of the hierarchy and restrict it. In time, the troops will show a willingness to do as ordered and the government would then offer them more incentives in the form of the rest of the pyramid. What I’m telling you is supported by basic psychology, most notably the Milgram experiment. So you can Google that when you have the time.
My bb gun has only ever had one scope attached to it. Why mess with perfection? I believe in getting it right the first time, wherever possible.
Good one. LOL!
See this is where you’re wrong. What you’re preparing for, and what I’m preparing for are two different things. IMHO, this country is done, there is no saving her. Therefore, I’m currently taking the steps to remove myself from the situation, and if I am not successful, death is always bliss.
Yes, technology is grand, you guys ever think of taking the Space Opera to another level?
Originally posted by nenothtu
Another level? it goes as it goes, and the nature of the collaborative effort we're making sometimes leads to unpredictable results. At times, the story takes on a life of it's own, we all go on a wild ride, and try to keep up as best we can. It's not all that structured or planned, so I'm not sure we can take it to another level, but it's always possible that it will arrive there nonetheless.
The intitial quote was Dooper's, but I'll field the response directed at me.
Granted, but "the average American" wasn't the basis of the discussion, the so-called militia was.
Those same average Americans you refer to are the people who will unfortunately be caught in the crossfire between whichever factions are duking it out at the moment….I'd have to agree with that, but that doesn't mean I have to just lay there and take it.
Bleed over it? Just go to your profile page, edit it, and copy and paste the quote into your sig field.
You can give up on it and accept the collar if you like, it's your right as an American.
Nor Have I ever claimed to speak for ALL ex soldiers or vets. Sweeping generalizations are useless things….I'm not a leader by any stretch of the imagination, and in fact I make a pretty poor follower too. It's gotten me in trouble before.
It wouldn't be the first government to fall through sheer inactivity then. No, I think they'd HAVE to weigh in.
Also granted. That, my friend, would go even further in eroding support for the government, as in "look how they just left us to die! What good are they?"
It's not that I believe it's patriotic to go down with a sinking ship, it's more that I'm unwilling to continue on after my ship has been swapped for a garbage scow….Death is of course a different matter.
I don't find the term offensive in itself. In common with the N word, it's not the word itself, it's how it is applied. It wouldn't need constitutional protection if it never offended anyone.
You believe then, that no group of Americans can find a commonality?
That, in my mind, would be taking the "multiculturalism" and "diversity" notions to an extreme….Groupthink doesn't become an issue until they reach a tipping point, and actions are taken.
If it were that simple, no revolts or unrest would have occurred since Maslow developed his theories. They would have been put into use, and no further unrest would have been possible.
The key there may be the time lag between the initial restrictions, and the release of the further incentives down the road. When the timing is a bit off, folks will take care of their own needs, often to the detriment of the manipulator.
Again, throwing in the towel is your right as an American…I hope you can avoid an untimely one.
Another level?...It's not all that structured or planned, so I'm not sure we can take it to another level, but it's always possible that it will arrive there nonetheless.
Originally posted by EMPIRE
Those same average Americans you refer to ... I'd have to agree with that, but that doesn't mean I have to just lay there and take it.
This is what I’ve been saying only I’m not saying it will be an “us VS them” situation. What I’ve said several times now is it will be an “us VS us” situation.
... battle will not be waged between the government and the citizens, and if it is, the citizens will be crushed in record breaking time know one will even know it was a battle.
You can give up on it and accept the collar if you like, it's your right as an American.
No it’s not giving up and accepting the collar but knowing when to walk away with a bit of dignity and hope intact. I mean seriously, what are you fighting for? What do people fight for? The same things over and over and the cycle never ends. There will be no utopia for your children, your grandchildren, their great grandchildren, etc. The only thing that will change is the faces in the game but the game will remain unchanged.
Nor Have I ever claimed to speak for ALL ex soldiers or vets. ...
Which is what I’ve been saying. A person can’t say all soldiers will fight in some crazy insurrection. Moreover, all citizens wouldn’t side with them even though what they are fighting for may be in their best interest. However, who is a soldier most likely to follow? Is he most likely to follow the government or the average joe?
... Yes, what you say is a tactic of guerrilla warfare, but that is in places where the guerillas already have an allegiance or support from the public. Now look at the average American citizen. Who does he turn to for his news, information, insight, etc? Who does he look to in time of need or protection? Does he look to the government or these so-called militiamen?
What are the chances of long term survival or being successful when it comes to doing something you’re unprepared for? Contrary to what you’re saying, if there was a battle between citizens and the gov, that would be the right time the government would step in, offer help, and in return get those citizens to squash the other citizens operating in rebellion.
So why fight? What intrinsic or extrinsic value compells you to fight a loosing battle? This is different from mutual combat or fighting some guy who breaks into your home. In those cases I say go down swinging, even if they have weapons. But in this case, it is futile to wage war against them.
You believe then, that no group of Americans can find a commonality?
Yes they can. Via the idiot box, artificial commonality is marketed and promoted to them 24-7. Aside from that, the people are too fragmented and egotistical to put their differences aside and accept the most basic of commonalities—that we’re all human.
And if bullets were to start flying right now you wouldn’t have time for a tipping point. Moreover, any action would simply be a reaction, and reaction from a fragmented group will yield minimal results.
It has been implemented but not fully in America. The reason why it will work in America, and work very well, is due to the majority of the population not being self-sufficient, not cognizant of the wiles of the government and ultimately, being consumers, sheeple and what some have termed as “useless-eaters.”
The government would do the right thing and compensate them for their work. ... However, if they can’t get it from the government they are going to TAKE IT from who?
Thanks for the well wishes, but it’s part of the path I’ve chosen for myself.
There is a lot of content on this site, or that has spun off from this site, that can be monetitized. There are so many ideas and concepts that can be made into I.P.’s and it’s easy because the core fan base is already built in. This is what I mean by taking it to the next level: Off of ATS and into the hands of the public.
We're probably just arguing over semantics here….A bullet doesn't care.
At some point, the government will HAVE to weigh in, just to retain credibility as a government….At a minimum, sabotage can be a big surprise…. No, I'm of the opinion that a resuorceful human can, and has beaten all manner of high tech whiz bangs.
I don't believe it will be the cakewalk that TPTB think it will….The Northern forces in the last civil war here had much the same attitude, until First Manassas. They were quickly disabused of that notion….
Yeah, that was probably a bit harsh. I apologize.
I'll be fighting to inflict the maximum damage I can on those who would damage me and mine….I can't leave….There's always a wannabe overlord, who will always get overconfident and take it just a bit too far. No, there never will be, nor has there ever been, any sort of utopia, for anyone. I'm just of the opinion that some dystopias are worse than others. I had a Syrian friend that told me much the same thing about the middle east. The players change, but it's been the same war for well over 2000 years is almost PRECISELY what he said.I reckon things are tough all over.
I'd say most WILL fight, we seem to be having a difference of opinion as to which side the bulk of them will gravitate to….It will most likely eventually lead to a near merger within the opposing factions, and citizen/soldier won't matter so much by then.
If it gets that rough, the average soldier will most likely follow his conscience, and whoever is in leadership of "his" side. It won't pan out on government/average Joe sides. Average Joe will himself be a follower of someone, not a leader of anyone.
Those alleigances and support structures are coalescing even as we speak, and even as the country polarizes itself even more….Every day, the tendrils are lengthening and strengthening, almost, but not quite, imperceptibly.
To answer the last question: in rural areas, each other, which will be the bulk of the "militias" there. In the inner cities, the gangsters pretty much run the show, which will be the militias there. In the in between zones, the suburban and reasonably affluent areas, they still rely on government for "protection".
That's what I'm saying. The government would HAVE to step in. Folks may be surprised which way the squashing goes when they do, as those most likely to accept government "help" are those most unprepared to fight the battles. "
That's precisely it. This IS my home. And I WILL go down swinging. It's my opinion that if you've got nothing worth dying or, you just got nothing. It's only futile if I surrender it.
That's OK. Lots of folks are going to be surprised when they see how people will band together to oppose a perceived enemy. Differences get put aside pretty quickly when the wolf is at the door, and you suddenly realize how small those differences really are. Folks with the big differences will be playing for the opposing team.
When bullets start flying, that IS the tipping point. I agree about the reaction and fragmented groups points. That's why the first month or so is likely to be sheer chaos. What comes out the other side of that chaos will be a bit more cohesive.
That depends on location. In cities, you're absolutely right, everyone DEPENDS on the government controlled infrastructure. It's going to be a really scary meltdown there.In more rural areas, not so much.
From wherever they can, government included. Most likely to resupply off of perceived enemies, to avoid alienating perceived friendlies. I guess maybe you'd have to have lived through it to believe it possible.
I honestly DO wish you well. I just can't force myself to stay pissed off at you. I'd like to know what corner of the earth you think will be safe, but it wouldn't be wise to post it in an open forum.
I think that's against ATS rules without a bunch of agreements and legalese stuff.