It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
It came to my attention James Carrion, MUFON’s International Director, who also refers to himself as “Truth Seeker” has submitted a blog on Stan Romanek who I am one of the Independent Investigators for. Hey James! Are you sure you’re not known as “The Smoking Man”? he he (ie. old X-Files) I don’t think James smokes, but after reading his blog on Stan, maybe he should start. Yes I’m a MUFON Field Investigator as well as a MUFON STAR Investigator, but I’m also an Independent UFO Investigator which includes “non” MUFON investigations. For various reasons, some people prefer not to use MUFON, so people like me are available for them and their needs. (Especially after James’s last blog ”feud” with the “Open Minds Forum”.) I guess I’ll be getting pretty busy.
Originally posted by fls13
reply to post by Frank Warren
I gotta be honest Frank, these peeing matches are really off putting to me. Call me old fashioned, but I think collaboration is a lot better than cannibalization.
Originally posted by Frank Warren
Evenin' Fls13,
Although I haven't absorbed all of Zukowski's particulars in his rebuttal as of yet . . . Carrion made salient, sober points in his argument, and a "pissing contest," his was not.
Cheers,
Frank
Originally posted by fls13
reply to post by Frank Warren
I gotta be honest Frank, these peeing matches are really off putting to me. Call me old fashioned, but I think collaboration is a lot better than cannibalization.
Originally posted by jkrog08
Oh it seems to be a common theme in ufology today...
Internal bickering between ourselves, mainly over ego and personal beliefs.
Originally posted by DoomsdayRex
Originally posted by jkrog08
Oh it seems to be a common theme in ufology today...
Internal bickering between ourselves, mainly over ego and personal beliefs.
Sometimes it seems there is less concern with the truth and more concern about personal validation. People do not want the truth, they want to be right.
Originally posted by jkrog08
I wonder though, is this internal 'battle' due to the fact that it seems ufology as somewhat stagnated?
Originally posted by jkrog08
Could not agree with you more, greatly insightful post.
I wonder though, is this internal 'battle' due to the fact that it seems ufology as somewhat stagnated?
Originally posted by jkrog08
Thus we have the ever growing divide between the "skeptical ufologist" and the "believer ufologist".
Originally posted by fls13
Originally posted by Frank Warren
Evenin' Fls13,
Although I haven't absorbed all of Zukowski's particulars in his rebuttal as of yet . . . Carrion made salient, sober points in his argument, and a "pissing contest," his was not.
Cheers,
Frank
Sometimes you just gotta let things go whether salient points are there to be made or not.
Chuck Zukowski
Hey James! Are you sure you’re not known as “The Smoking Man”? he he (ie. old X-Files) I don’t think James smokes, but after reading his blog on Stan, maybe he should start. I love James’s first paragraph in his blog on human behavior as if he is “above it” to observe and manipulate.
Originally posted by fls13
reply to post by Frank Warren
Well here's what Carrion wrote. Pretty reasonable in my view.
From that Zukowski writes:
Chuck Zukowski
Hey James! Are you sure you’re not known as “The Smoking Man”? he he (ie. old X-Files) I don’t think James smokes, but after reading his blog on Stan, maybe he should start. I love James’s first paragraph in his blog on human behavior as if he is “above it” to observe and manipulate.
Debating, disagreeing without being disagreeable is fine. I don't think Zukowski's comments were necessary at all.
[edit on 1-9-2009 by fls13]