It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Certain Health Reform Policy Options Would Significantly Reduce Number of Uninsured Americans
Monday
August 24, 2009
...Researchers from RAND, a nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization, found that under different design choices the Baucus proposal could significantly cut the number of uninsured Americans with almost no increase in overall spending on health care, although government costs would increase by an estimated 5 percent to 7 percent.
"What is clear is that the extent of subsidies to help people purchase insurance, as well as the size of the penalty for an individual who fails to purchase insurance or an employer who fails to offer it, can make a substantial difference," said Elizabeth McGlynn, co-director of COMPARE and associate director of RAND Health. "These are some of the key decisions that face Congress when it returns after the recess." ...
...A unique feature of the RAND analysis is the ability to estimate the impact of these policy changes on the health of the nation. Researchers estimate that under full implementation, the white paper's proposal would add 9.3 million life years to the U.S. population.
That proposal relates to draft legislation that is still being negotiated by the Senate Finance Committee, of which Sen. Baucus (D-Montana) is chairman. Not all of the elements examined by RAND will necessarily be part of the legislation that ultimately emerges from that committee, but many of the features are similar to those found in the House Tri-Committee bill and the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee bill.
you would think that better health care would be something all humans would want.
Originally posted by anyone
reply to post by mental modulator
Yes, the contempt of a democrat in office, perhaps. It really is strange how repelled some are from facts. I was hoping for more discourse to arise... you would think that better health care would be something all humans would want. I hope it's what we'll get.
Here's hoping!
-anyone
Originally posted by jam321
Do you really think it would be wise to pass a bill that Congress has barely read?
Do you really think it is wise or necessary to rush this through in six months with very little debate?
Not debate so much among us the average citizens, but debate among the doctors, hospitals, lawyers, politicians, corporations, employers who all play an important role in our healthcare. Individuals and entities that can offer real insight into what is really the problem and what is the best fix for our system.
People like mental modulator who have insight into how the game is played. It is a shame that Congress can get committees for kneepads talk, steroids talk, embarrassing Generals, but can't get a committee to do what is right for America.
I don't think I asking for much when I ask Congress to FIX IT RIGHT THE FIRST TIME.
I don't care if it takes a year or even two years. Don't care if it is Obama's term or somebody's else term. Just for them to take their time and do it right.
I am tired of Congresses quick fixes that only end up costing us more
trouble down the line.
Good luck -
Originally posted by Johnmike
reply to post by anyone and post by jam321
Have you guys ever even heard of the Blue Dog Democrats? You're either ignorant or nuts if you think there was little or no Democratic opposition to the current health care reform proposals.
repubs aren't willing to budge.
See, that is the problem. Dems don't need the Reps. They could have passed this already if they wanted to.
Originally posted by jam321
reply to post by anyone
you would think that better health care would be something all humans would want.
I agree with you. But let's look at it from a different point of view.
How long have we been with the current situation?
Now, based on your answer.
Do you really think it would be wise to pass a bill that Congress has barely read?
Do you really think it is wise or necessary to rush this through in six months with very little debate?
Not debate so much among us the average citizens, but debate among the doctors, hospitals, lawyers, politicians, corporations, employers who all play an important role in our healthcare. Individuals and entities that can offer real insight into what is really the problem and what is the best fix for our system.
People like mental modulator who have insight into how the game is played. It is a shame that Congress can get committees for kneepads talk, steroids talk, embarrassing Generals, but can't get a committee to do what is right for America.
I don't think I asking for much when I ask Congress to FIX IT RIGHT THE FIRST TIME.
I don't care if it takes a year or even two years. Don't care if it is Obama's term or somebody's else term. Just for them to take their time and do it right.
I am tired of Congresses quick fixes that only end up costing us more trouble down the line.
Originally posted by redhatty
Interesting chart they provide in the analysis www.randcompare.org...
Also interesting to note how many of the proposals that will make a difference are also difficult to implement.
It appears they ran on the Baucus "Call to Action" White paper, which makes many recommendation that are incorporated in many of the bills floating, but not one of the bills floating encompasses all of the recommendations.
The specific proposals included in the analysis are listed here www.randcompare.org...
Another fun thing to experiment with is the modeling estimates, and you can pick & choose the factors for the results.
Another interesting piece of information in that RAND provides, is a listing of the different State's initiatives already in the works or regulated by the individual states www.randcompare.org...
Pretty good info there, too bad they didn't conclude with which proposals would be the least difficult to enact and yet still provide the best benefit for the public.