It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by star in a jar
Since Jupiter is a gas giant, where did the asteroid go, did it exit on the other side, break up, or did Jupiter absorb it like a sponge?
Originally posted by Hastobemoretolife
I thought Jupiter was a giant ball of gas, and because of which doesn't have a surface.
Do you have a link to the article you linked to the picture.
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
reply to post by Liamoville
an Earth sized block of ice that wasn't a comet? That doesn't match the current model, does it? Of course, the "tail" on Enceladus doesn't match the current model, either.
To those who keep saying "I was led to believe Jupiter was a ball of gas", please take a few moments to actively investigate. If you are only going off of what you were "led" to believe, then you are not actively participating in your own education. A cursory glance at some research material on Jupiter will dispel your beliefs.
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
reply to post by Liamoville
an Earth sized block of ice that wasn't a comet? That doesn't match the current model, does it? Of course, the "tail" on Enceladus doesn't match the current model, either.
To those who keep saying "I was led to believe Jupiter was a ball of gas", please take a few moments to actively investigate. If you are only going off of what you were "led" to believe, then you are not actively participating in your own education. A cursory glance at some research material on Jupiter will dispel your beliefs.
Originally posted by phoenix103
reply to post by paradiselost333
Still awaiting an image from someone else.
Has anyone seen any more yet?
Originally posted by Soylent Green Is People
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
reply to post by Liamoville
an Earth sized block of ice that wasn't a comet? That doesn't match the current model, does it? Of course, the "tail" on Enceladus doesn't match the current model, either.
To those who keep saying "I was led to believe Jupiter was a ball of gas", please take a few moments to actively investigate. If you are only going off of what you were "led" to believe, then you are not actively participating in your own education. A cursory glance at some research material on Jupiter will dispel your beliefs.
I don't think any current model says that there can't be very large icy bodies out there. I suspect (and so do many scientists) that there could be a lot of objects like that exist in the Kuiper Belt -- it's not impossible for one of those objects to move inward.
Plus -- more importantly -- nobody is even sure how big the object was, they only know the size of the mark that it made, which is probably larger than the original object.
...And Enceladus' "tail" is a geyser -- which may be unusual, but not something that scientists would have claimed was "inconsistent with the current model of the solar system".
I don't understand why you say that we need to re-evaulate the idea that Jupiter is a ball of gas. How does this impact or the impact of shoemaker-Levy 9 back in 1994 change that idea?
Just because scientists do not yet completely understand how an impact could make a temporary mark in the gaseous "surface" of Jupiter does not mean that Jupiter can't be gaseous.
[edit on 7/21/2009 by Soylent Green Is People]
The jets are focused on the south polar region of the moon, which was supposed to be the coldest place on a long-dead body. Enceladus is just 504 kilometers in diameter – too small to support significant internal heating. NASA scientists, however, work within a narrow frame of reference. If dynamic activity observed on planets, moons, and comets cannot be explained by solar radiation, just about the only thing left to account for it is something going on beneath the surface.
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
Here is their explanation of the "geyser" theory:
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
...There are reports of asteroids that begin emitting a tail, then stop. I believe that Enceladus (in the below photo) has a tail, a phenomenon that i do not believe to be caused by geysers.
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
reply to post by Pauligirl
Jupiter, according to Ingo Swann, has a solid core. He describes it in "Penetration" (you can find it on Scribd).
You may discount him...but he also saw the ring around Jupiter before it was discovered (among a few other things). He is, in my estimation, VERY credible.
When i was younger the consensus was that Jupiters core was metallic Hydrogen, i believe.
The new hypothesis attributes the imagined internal heat to “the rapid decay of radioactive elements within Enceladus shortly after it formed.” This, according to NASA, “may have jump-started the long-term heating of the moon's interior that continues today.”
"Enceladus is a very small body, and it's made almost entirely of ice and rock. The puzzle is how the moon developed a warm core," said Dr. Julie Castillo, the lead scientist developing the new model at JPL. "The only way to achieve such high temperatures at Enceladus is through the very rapid decay of some radioactive species."
Originally posted by buick
i wonder what nassim haramein has to say about this, with his theories about sun spots and planet vortex, maybe this wasn't a impact, but a large object entering the solar system through jupiters core, that acording to haramein is a black hole, like every other planet and the sunsun