It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Astronauts on the Moon by 2018?
Source
If President Bush's "vision for space exploration," announced in 2004, is to succeed, NASA would very much need to take advantage of resources it can find on the moon. If there is ice to be found, it can be used for drinking water for astronauts and as coolant for equipment. It can be broken down into hydrogen and oxygen -- ingredients for rocket fuel that need not be brought from Earth.
On Apollo missions 11, 12, (Apollo 13 was aborted, but returned to Earth safely), 14, 15, 16 and 17,
the commanders and lunar module pilots conducted a series of experiments, photographed their
And here are the astronauts on these missions why not ask these guys?
lunar surroundings and returned to Earth 382 kilograms (843 pounds) of lunar surface materials
Originally posted by Adroc
Well if the moon is already figured out, why does EVERYBODY want to go back?
Maybe because there is something extraordinary there?
Originally posted by Nohup
And it's become a little easier over the past several years, because technology has developed to a point where coordinating a trip to the moon to take some pictures is a lot more affordable than it used to be.
Originally posted by paradiselost333
I was waiting for some one to bring up money! IMO its not money they have plenty of money " they might say its money" but Cmon do you realy believe that? Yea you can figure out what there budget is but are you going to honestly say that NASA is up front about finances!!
Originally posted by Nohup
But going to the moon has very limited value, scientifically, or strategically.
Originally posted by Adroc
Yes, but maybe the fact that technology has developed to a point where don't even need to go there to get pictures (i.e. Clementine in '94), brings up questions as to why they want to actually go back to set foot.