It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by scubagravy
reply to post by XXXN3O
Are you saying that i may be onto something here?? Its puzzled me for a while. I can understand why trying to find information on the net to validate this would be somewhat difficult.
I will follow my theory a little closer from now on.
Thankyou for that input, i can imagine you may recieve some critism from others on your post, but u get a star from me.
External box thinking, I like it !!
The association is more than just casual – development of cancer within a few months of eschewing cigarette smoking.
Over a period of 4 years, a total of 312 cases were treated for carcinoma of pulmonary origin: of this number, 182 patients had quit smoking within five to fifteen months prior to their being diagnosed with lung cancer. Of the 182 patients 142 were male and 40 were females, with ages ranged between 47 to 74.
Originally posted by XXXN3O
I worked in pre clinical studies and whether you believe this is entirely up to you as I cannot provide facts from the net on this.
Guess which ones had a higher cancer rate?
Smokers who had quit.
Originally posted by pieman
Originally posted by XXXN3O
I worked in pre clinical studies and whether you believe this is entirely up to you as I cannot provide facts from the net on this.
what, not even the actual study?
Guess which ones had a higher cancer rate?
Smokers who had quit.
how big was the study? what were the ages of the subjects? what range of occupations were involved? how long a period was the study conducted over? what exactly was the study looking for/at? who carried it out?
Originally posted by XXXN3O
with ages ranged between 47 to 74.
Whats your theory?
Originally posted by pieman
Originally posted by XXXN3O
with ages ranged between 47 to 74.
Whats your theory?
knowing men, guy started coughing up blood, gave up smoking, still coughing up blood, went to the doctor.
men don't seek medical advise quickly enough which, given the small minority of women involved and the age ranges, makes this a seriously flawed study.
Originally posted by XXXN3O
You do have a point yes but surely you see mine?
Originally posted by KAKUSA
Tobacco without all the additives is nearly impossible to smoke... they said it was too harsh and they all choked on it... So if your growing your own tobacco your in for a big surpise when you light your first one....
Originally posted by pieman
Originally posted by XXXN3O
You do have a point yes but surely you see mine?
i do see your point, i'ld say there's a possible link but i really doubt it's the link you are making. i'ld need some serious evidence.
as regards funding for research to show that it's better to continue smoking than to give up, i'ld say the tobacco industry might climb over hot coals on it's testicles to fund research showing it were even possibly true.
Originally posted by XXXN3O
I think it would also cause an outrage if there was a U-Turn and everyone was encouraged to keep smoking by the health industry if they were long term smokers.
Originally posted by Unit541
There are plenty of all natural tobacco products out there, without all the additives, and they're certainly not "impossible" to smoke. Trust me, formaldehyde, antifreeze and urea do not make a smoother or more pleasurable smoke.