It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Republican08
Honestly, how does one person, get every animal on earth into a boat, while we're still discovering new animals to this day.
For that matter, how does adam name each animal while we're still discovering new ones to this day.
In Hindu traditions, Manu is a title accorded to the progenitor of mankind, and also the very first king to rule this earth, who saved mankind from the universal flood.
en.wikipedia.org...(Hinduism)
Originally posted by InfaRedMan
I don't believe the Ark story. Even as a child the story didn't hold any water (pardon the pun).
Firstly, It would have been logistically impossible to gather 2 of every animal. We had continents separated by seas and he would have needed a ship to gather them all... millions of them... mammals, marsupials, reptiles, insects, arachnids ... etc etc etc.
Secondly, he could not have built a ship (ark) with enough structural integrity to accommodate the sheer size the ark would be required to be to house said animals and supplies such as food and water. They just didn't have the knowhow, technology or materials.
Like many things in the bible... it requires 'faith' or stupidity... and a LOT of it!
IRM
Originally posted by king9072
What was your first clue the that the entire story was a fable?
2 Peter 1:16
For we have not followed cunningly devised fables, when we made known unto you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but were eyewitnesses of his majesty.
Originally posted by ahnggk
Secondly, he could not have built a ship (ark) with enough structural integrity to accommodate the sheer size the ark would be required to be to house said animals and supplies such as food and water. They just didn't have the knowhow, technology or materials.
Originally posted by ahnggk
First could be the possibility that during Noah's time, Earth was still one continent, the commonly known 'Pangea' continent. It could also help strengthen the theory, thanks to you that timeline of men and dinosaurs have overlapped, thus, we might have existed during the time when there only one continent....
Second, it may seem nerve-wracking that how a ship could hold all the world's species?
Finally, diversity of species may not be as wide now as it was Noah's time, but we actually don't know.
It was also mentioned that they had divine help. They didn't do this alone, especially the guiding of the animals to the ship.
Originally posted by MoonChild02
reply to post by Republican08
First of all, it was six of every animal and two of the unclean ones (pigs, cattle, etc). Second, it landed on Mount Ararat. Third, it wasn't all animals all over the world, as it's understood that it wasn't the whole entire world that flooded, just the entire world as the people in the story saw it.
Basically this is what Biblical historians say happened:
Every Spring the Tigris River overflows. Every so often the overflowing of the river is so bad that it floods the entire Tigris River Valley. It's believed that particular time, humans only lived in that valley, and didn't exist elsewhere on the globe. Hence, the story of the Tower of Babble, and God having to tell the humans to spread out among the land, eventually forcing them to spread out due to language barriers.
Anyway, what happened that particular year was that the river so overflowed that it drowned everyone and everything in the valley, except those on the ark. However, due to the flooding being only within that region, Noah and his family only needed to gather the species of animals that lived there. Therefore, there was no need to grab every species that we now know of, just the ones native to the Tigris River Valley.
Originally posted by Lannock
I assume that you're a Christian defending the Bible. If you are defending the Bible you have to defend the notion that the Bible is the LITERAL Word of God, i.e. created in 6 24-hour days.
Originally posted by In nothing we trust
Originally posted by Lannock
I assume that you're a Christian defending the Bible. If you are defending the Bible you have to defend the notion that the Bible is the LITERAL Word of God, i.e. created in 6 24-hour days.
Why must the bible be defended - number 1?
Originally posted by In nothing we trust
Why is assumed that a christian must interpret the bible literally - number 2?
Originally posted by Lannock
Is the flood story a parable or something of that sort?