It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by King Seesar
I think you can make a valid case that Freemasons is a breeding ground for the Illuminati and the Nwo, but there is a reason for that, because the Masons have had so many high profile members that the Illuminati sees these powerful players and try and draw them in,
Originally posted by MintWithHole
Since those who attend the celebrations (?) in Bohemian Grove are big and influential businessmen, politicians or royalty I would imagine that a very high percentage of them would be masons. After all, in some walks of life you simply cannot climb the corporate ladder unless you belong to a lodge.
Originally posted by RuneSpider
reply to post by Mintwithahole.
What walks of life, out of curiosity?
As for Brother's post, I know many people who'd say the same of their system. It's neither intrinsic, nor unique to Masonry.
Originally posted by King Seesar
One thing i am wondering tho is who is this Masonic God Jaboolon that Masons worship???
freedocumentaries.net...
And just how many omnipotent beings do you suppose there are out there? I only know of one, and he doesn't really care much what name people give him (after all, he's the one who gave us all different languages anyway, right?)
Originally posted by Mintwithahole.
But doesn't the bible tell us that there is but one god and that all other gods are false?
Yep. He sure is. In English. People from other cultures may be praying to the same God and using different words. That's OK. He's smart enough to figure it out.
If so, how can you all have different names for him?
God is god!!!
As has been mentioned before, we are speaking for ourselves, which is why we're not saying the exact same thing. Wonderful thing, free will.
Surely you masons were happier before you joined the freemasons and could speak and think for yourself?
Why should I do something solely with the desire for their praise? I don't do good deeds for admiration, celebration or attention. I do good deeds because they're the right thing to do. If someone notices, fine. If they don't, that's OK too. I give to charities anonymously; I do some of the crap-work at work that nobody else wants to take on; I do it cheerfully because its stuff that someone has to do.
When your actions to your friends and neighbours dictated how the people around you thought of you?
I don't do either. I don't know that you could point to anything we've discussed here that would indicate that any of that has any basis in truth.
Wasn't that better than being slapped on the back and being told that you're better than everyone else purely because you have an apron draped around your waist? And don't you get sick to the high teeth having to fall in line and tell your brothers (how I hate that term) just how great they are?
Originally posted by Mintwithahole.
But doesn't the bible tell us that there is but one god and that all other gods are false? If so, how can you all have different names for him?
I've never understood all this zorastor, shiva and abaddon stuff.
The different names for god allows plenty of scope for satanists to insert their god in there.
The hand shakes, the symbolism, the feelings of superiority, it all smacks of occultism to me.
But I suppose I have that wrong as well?
Surely you masons were happier before you joined the freemasons and could speak and think for yourself? When your actions to your friends and neighbours dictated how the people around you thought of you?
Wasn't that better than being slapped on the back and being told that you're better than everyone else purely because you have an apron draped around your waist?
And don't you get sick to the high teeth having to fall in line and tell your brothers (how I hate that term)...
just how great they are? This sycathantic behaviour is appalling and just turns me off.
Originally posted by Mintwithahole.
Yes but the other responses didn't have your tone or called me "kiddo".
Originally posted by Mintwithahole.
A normal person well understands that there are two sides to every story. I myself in previous posts have praised the masons for the work they do with getting children hospital care etc.
Originally posted by Mintwithahole.
But these last pages of posts have opened my eyes. You see to a mason there is only one side of the story, their side! Nothing else matters. . .
Originally posted by Mintwithahole.
Someone earlier mentioned brainwashing. Days ago I would have laughed at such a suggestion but after what I've now read it becomes clear that there is a subtle brainwashing taking place in lodges.
Originally posted by Mintwithahole.
By building up their self respect to abnormal lengths and giving them a feeling of self importance, coupled with the back slapping and general delight caused by pumping up each others ego's, it's no wonder that they lose grip of reality. Masons are having the part of their reasoning that is inquisitive and questions things slowly removed from their mind. They no longer have the ability to question things as their head is full of nonsense.
Originally posted by Mintwithahole.
Why else would an ordinary descent person protect the memory of a racist?
Originally posted by Mintwithahole.
And if you would protect the memory of a racist what else would you protect? Perhaps a mason who committed murder? How about a mason who embezzled money?
Originally posted by Mintwithahole.
But doesn't the bible tell us that there is but one god and that all other gods are false?
Surely you masons were happier before you joined the freemasons and could speak and think for yourself?
Originally posted by Mintwithahole.
reply to post by network dude
I'll say it again, masons just can't condemn a fellow brother.
Originally posted by Mintwithahole.
Makes me wonder just how far the masons would go to cover up more serious crimes, after all it wouldn't be too hard considering most judges belong to a lodge.