New Analysis Video of the STS-75 Tether Incident

reply to post by JimOberg

Whew!

just because i told Springer i would back off from pestering you doesn't mean your off the hook. you made a promise to everyone and i expect or at least hope you will still make good on it.... tick toc , tick toc , tick toc...

[edit on 12-11-2009 by easynow]

Here's a 9 meg file of the STS-75 SCENE LIST of all video/16-mm during the mission.

This is a temporary storage location -- somebody else ought to host it permanently and post the URL here:

www.quickfilepost.com...

Originally posted by easynow
NASA UFOs on STS-75 UV "TOP" camera

EZ, you [insert intelligence insulting term of choice here].

Haven't you ever watched the Pleiades set before?

Two minutes with heavens-above would have saved you the humiliation.

But I'd have missed out on the gloating and the stomping on your face.

No more treats for you until you face up to your inanity.

Pleiades.

STARS.

Not "NASA UFOs".

Not this time, and based on your track record, not EVER.

Originally posted by easynow
NASA UFOs on STS-75 UV "TOP" camera

what UFO's? Why you call them UFOs?


I see Pleiades and stars.

Look here a chart map, i tried fast to replicate what we see there as orientation and zoom settings (i used Skymap, an old sky -chart software)





Maybe you are puzzled by the apparition/dissapearance of them...well, i see this phenomenon before in my CCD cameras..basically, when the star image, which is a point, hit a pixel, it will make maximum signal. When slighty moving between adiacent pixels, some light is lost on the borders between pixels, therefore, the signal is lower. Since the image star is slowly moving across the senzor while the shuttle is slowwly orbiting and changing it's angle, that's why you have this phenomenon.






[edit on 12/11/09 by depthoffield]

reply to post by JimOberg


i didn't realize that was such a bad copy of that video (i'll try to find a better one) and there's more than just some stars in it but of course you would never admit to that anyways. i would be wasting my breath (keystrokes) even debating it with you.

but please don't hold back on posting more "treats" just because i posted a video that you don't know what your looking at.

this info you have to share is for everyone not just me and i surely don't want to be the reason you clam up again.

thanks for the file i'll check it out



[edit on 12-11-2009 by easynow]

[edit on 12-11-2009 by easynow]

Originally posted by easynow
but please don't hold back on posting more "treats" just because i posted a video that you don't know what your looking at.

Apparently I don't know what to look for either as I also don't see any either. What is the time in the video/location in the frame where the UFOs appear? I never saw any.

Originally posted by easynow

Stick to the thread's topic, you're thrashing in panic. Calm down and focus.

Here's a comparison

Originally posted by draknoir2
Here's a comparison

Is that first view in UV?

Originally posted by JimOberg

Originally posted by draknoir2
Here's a comparison

Is that first view in UV?

Dunno... just googled "Pleiades" and picked an image. All I did with the lower one is clip it from the youtube link, enlarge and rotate it to make it easier to compare relative positions of the dots.

Originally posted by draknoir2
Here's a comparison

Yeah I saw the stars, I was looking for the UFOs though, is that them? The UFOs are stars?

Originally posted by easynow

here i see a lot of stars, some debris (very plausible) with trails due to the camera effect known as trails ghosting (i don't know exactly the real name, but i recognise the effect).
Also, one plausible debris on the left appearing to suddenly change the trajectory, but this is an effect of camera stoping suddenly from the un-zooming action, and the "debris"particle having an up motion relative to the camera's frame

Now, Easynow, you began to act off-topic here (STS 75 videos). Are you trying to do some analysis, or just making fun?






[edit on 12/11/09 by depthoffield]

reply to post by depthoffield


i'm "thrashing in panic"



speaking of thrashing you guy's seen this video ?

reply to post by draknoir2



your not implying that looks the same are you ?

it's not a match that's for sure

[edit on 12-11-2009 by easynow]

I wasn't implying anything... I was SAYING "Here's a comparison".

reply to post by draknoir2


ok sorry i wasn't sure what to think about it. i was being attacked by the usual suspects when you posted it so i was distracted and didn't look at that comparison close enough till later on. good work on that , thanks

Originally posted by easynow
reply to post by draknoir2

 

ok sorry i wasn't sure what to think about it. i was being attacked by the usual suspects when you posted it so i was distracted and didn't look at that comparison close enough till later on. good work on that , thanks

I don't know you, so why would I be rude to you?

Here's another comparison [not implication].





P.S.: I love Rammstein.

[edit on 12-11-2009 by draknoir2]

Originally posted by JimOberg
This is a temporary storage location -- somebody else ought to host it permanently and post the URL here:

Here it is, on the Media AboveTopSecret portal, in PDF version.