It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
"Once that the key to Genesis is in our hands, the scientific and symbolical Kabalah unveils the secret. The Great Serpent of the garden of Eden and the Lord God are identical.
("The Secret Doctrine," H.P.Blavatsky)
32. Thoth (Gabriel) and his angel hosts formed a circle around about the mortal council, a thousand angels deep on every side, and thence, by a line of light, extending to Looeamong's throne, in Hapsendi, his heavenly kingdom.
33. By day and by night, Thoth and his hosts watched over the mortal council, overshadowing their every thought and word.
34. For four years and seven months the council thus deliberated, and selected from the two thousand and two hundred and thirty-one books and legendary tales.
35. And, at the end of that time, there had been selected and combined much that was good, and great, and worded so as to be well remembered by mortals.
36. As yet, no God had been selected by the council, and so they balloted, in order to determine that matter. And the first ballot gave prominence to the following Gods: Jove, Jupiter, Salenus, Baal, Thor, Gade, Apollo, Juno, Aries, Taurus, Minerva, Rhets, Mithra, Theo, Fragapatti, Atys, Durga, Indra, Neptune, Vulcan, Kriste, Agni, Croesus, Pelides, Huit, Hermes, Thulis, Thammus, Eguptus, Iao, Aph, Saturn, Gitchens, Minos, Maximo, Hecla, and Phernes.
(OAHSPE, Published 1884, author John Ballou Newborough)
Originally posted by SS,Naga
Who were the Sources for H.P.Blavatsky, by the way? These Very Same Melchizedeks! The churchists refer to them as Satan, or demons. Watch, Here's Your Demons:
(OAHSPE, Published 1884, author John Ballou Newborough)
See Full Excerpt here:
The blasphemous creation of jesu revealed in Truth
The Writings of the Fathers down to A.D. 325
Volume I. The Apostolic Fathers with Justin Martyr and Irenaeus
Clement of Rome, Mathetes, Polycarp, Ignatius, Barnabas, Papias, Justin Martyr, Irenaeus.
Volume II. Fathers of the Second Century
Hermas, Tatian, Theophilus, Athenagoras, Clement of Alexandria
Volume III. Latin Christianity: Its Founder, Tertullian
Three Parts: I. Apologetic; II. Anti-Marcion; III. Ethical
Volume IV. The Fathers of the Third Century
Tertullian Part IV; Minucius Felix; Commodian; Origen
Volume V. The Fathers of the Third Century
Hippolytus; Cyprian; Caius; Novatian; Appendix
Volume VI. The Fathers of the Third Century
Gregory Thaumaturgus; Dinoysius the Great; Julius Africanus; Anatolius and Minor Writers; Methodius; Arnobius
Volume VII. The Fathers of the Third and Fourth Centuries
Lactantius, Venantius, Asterius, Victorinus, Dionysius, Apostolic Teaching and Constitutions, Homily, Liturgies
Volume VIII.
The Twelve Patriarchs, Excerpts and Epistles, The Clementia, Apocrypha, Decretals, Memoirs of Edessa and Syriac Documents, Remains of the First Ages
Volume IX. Recently Discovered Additions to Early Christian Literature; Commentaries of Origen
The Gospel of Peter, The Diatessaron of Tatian, The Apocalypse of Peter, The Visio Pauli, The Apocalypses of the Virgin and Sedrach, The Testament of Abraham, The Acts of Xanthippe and Polyxena, The Narrative of Zosimus, The Apology of Aristides, The Epistles of Clement (Complete Text), Origen's Commentary on John, Books I-X, Origen's Commentary on Mathew, Books I, II, and X-XIV
Originally posted by SS,Naga
No, OASPHE is not false, even if it doesn't fit into your gnostic theology (!).
Notice your posted 'xtian' compilations: most are from the 3rd century, or dated with the compilation of the accepted books of the christian bible, yes? (If no, study theology). While Constantine didn't by any means create xtianity, he certainly Established it's Base, yes? (If no, study xtian theology, only with a clear mind). I've seen xtians' scream about the falsity of the Council of Nicea as to ever having anythign to do with the bible! (pastors). So, I say, clear mind.
False? What would you know fo false, when you reject Truth to fit your belief0system, without any Knowing Within? Say, direct from the Soul Above, hmmm? Do that? Ask it once, if you get a chance. FACT: Jesuwas, is, and always Has Been a Composited Mythological Character, Nothing More, Nothing Less. Play the idiot, become an idiot, like the blind masses everywhere. Yes? Thought so.
Now, you go ahead and believe your Illusion: I happen to have The WORD in my presence, which is the Same WORD that Emanated this Entire Allverse (fullverse).
False? Look in a mirror, you'll see False...or Confusion Within the Maze of Illusion.
I don't mind ignorance, it's everywhere: when I Know something, I'm going to set you right about it, accepted or no. Try the Central Light Core Within, It'll lead you to your Higher Self. Or as someone else how: Years (many) later, you'll learn to recognize the SoulSelf, and not the confusion of others.
Thanks: I've experienced spontaneous cosmic consciousness a number of times: I hardly notice those that obfuscate Truth, and live in denail because of their box belief-structure.
Oh, one last thing: False? Try your bible, eh? There, we have Falsity.
ROFL.
51. In three hundred and fifty years after this Jehovih raised up from the Aseneans, one Joshu, an iesu, in Nazareth. Joshu re-established Jehovih, and restored many of the lost rites and ceremonies.
52. In the thirty-sixth year of Joshu's age he was stoned to death in Jerusalem by the Jews that worshiped the heathen Gods.
Originally posted by SS,Naga
You quote many works of a contrived nature utilizing the term 'meaning Knowledge, which became a compsite meaning for 'jesu.' The writings in many of them indicate the same. You claim to believe these 'ancient writngs' as actual evidence of the use of the word, 'jesu.' Ignorance. Pure and simpel.
Example: the Coptic language was a descendant of ancient Egyptian, and the Gospel of Thomas was written in Sahidic Coptic, discovered in 1945. It is reputed to be a translation or adaptation of an earlier work, possibly [said] from around 140 A.D., which is believed to have been produced originally in Greek, and which was based on even more ancient sources. Presuming each of them called 'jesu' by name, is stupidity, of a cvery Grand christian kind, yes? Thought you might come around, clear mind and all.
I'm saying your ancient writings are contrived, none of which bear the actual named personage of 'jesu,' except as pure knowledge, or i-e-su, or whatever similar each language used as the generality.
So, as you blindly profess evidence which is insubstantial, backed by the fallacious codings and decoding of the church fathers (they wouldn't lie or connive, would they?), I say your wrong. You are obviously unable to substantiate 'jesu' as fact, and being a compsitied myth (mytholgoy), it's be hard to prove that everybody 'knew him quite well, yes, he was a neighbor,' back then.
OAHSPE stands. It represents a tellign of the compositing creation of the jesue personage, and the perpetration and perpetuation of xtianity. It even speaks clearly of many persoanges, which perhaps, were quite incredible, and who people spoke readily, even commonly, of.
But please, stop offering as supporting evidence these corrupted translations. You need to open the box up, and look around. There's Light Out Here.
(Joshu was one of those considered)
"Besides these, there were twenty-two other Gods and Goddesses, that received a small number of votes each."
(from OAHSPE)
Originally posted by SS,Naga
OASPHE was Transmitted (channeled) by Algonquin Masters within the Invisible. Read and study. They were the Enemies of christianity, liek, say, Crowley and Don Juan, and endless others, such as myself.