Never watch the news EVER again. The 9/11 taboo/NoPlanes video

reply to post by mosey


I'm not gonna sit here and rebut these videos line-by-line, but for example:

This video constantly makes the claim that planes don't enter buildings. There are several pictures posted by me and others that show that that is false with even much smaller, slower planes at that.

The video asks why none of the cameramen see the second plane coming. Nobody knew there was a second plane coming, so they were not looking for it. This is not difficult logic here.

The video makes the claim that "either this cameraman is completely blind and deaf, or there was no plane". That is totally false information (disinformation). We have no clue as to where the reporter is calling from or how far away from the towers he is. You can't say there was no plane just because a reporter could be one or more miles away and see and hear the explosion, but not be in a position to see or hear the plane.

The author lies right in his own video. He keeps saying "witnesses = 0", referring to no witnesses seeing the second plane. Then he plays a clip where an anchorman is talking to a female witness on the phone and he says:

"I didn't get the impression that it was that big a plane", and the female witness says "it was big from here".

Here's one of the real disinformation parts of the whole video:

Jeff Hill (shure) calls Boeing to ask about the flight speeds of a 767-200. Boeing confirms that the plane won't fly 500+ mph at 700 feet. While this is partially true, they left the real, full truth out either to purposely deceive, or because they were unresearched.

No, a 757 cannot get up to 500mph flying level at 700 feet. But the plane that hit the south tower wasn't flying level. It came down from a higher altitude as seen in the videos. When any plane descends from a higher altitude, it gains speed unless pilots extend the flaps on the wings. Extending the flaps creates drag and acts as a sort of air brake, slowing the plane down.

So, with both engines on the plane at full power and descending rapidly, you could easily reach 400-500mph no matter what the altitude. But if the plane leveled off at 700 feet, it wouldn't be able to sustain those speeds. I seriously doubt the plane was going much faster than 500mph, but it is possible.

The video goes on to say "have you ever noticed that the 175 strike videos are all amateur shots...not looking in the right spot?" Once again, nobody knew there was a second plane coming. If all cameras were looking in the right spots, then everyone would say that the media knew about it and was complicit. The no-planers are saying the media knew and was complicit, but with the opposite of evidence.

The video says "not one single cameraman seems to notice the (second) plane". For the third time, noboby knew there was a second plane coming to slam into the south tower.

The last words of the video are "Planes don't enter buildings. Think for yourself." Well, we've already shown that planes do enter buildings and you will not find a single building in the world that has or will make a large jetliner just bounce off.

I hope this answered some of your questions, Mosey.

reply to post by _BoneZ_


while I do respect your attempt at a rebuttal, I think your attempt was somewhat poor and your points were weak.
All one needs in order to notice that what was shown on the news was nothing short of fantastic illusion is common sense.
# what he says. watch the videos. listen to the interview with joseph keith. if by some miraculous chance the plane could make such a dive it would literally break up! not only that, multiple videos showing the plane coming in from different angles, sides, sizes, one video will show the plane making a huge dive before immediately leveling off and hitting, and another will show the plane simply coming straight on the entire time. i recommend watching september clues. one of the most interesting points that video makes is at one point they show a huge shot of the entire city, then zoom in really quickly and suddenly theres a plane in the shot about to hit the tower... then they do a slow mo replay, and to our suprise... during the city wide shot there is NO plane what so ever, and then suddenly, right after zoom in on the building, a boeing is popped into existence out of thin air right in time to hit the tower.

Im not saying I know what happened that day, but i pride myself with common sense i can say that this theory, though it is a far fetched one, actually holds a lot of weight.

Originally posted by mosey
I think your attempt was somewhat poor and your points were weak.

Weak? What the hell is weak about facts? It's a fact that nobody was looking for a second plane because they didn't know there was a second plane. It's a fact that this video purposely lied and said "zero witnesses" saw the second plane, and then he played a clip with a witness saying she saw the plane! It's a fact that the 757 can reach 500+ mph to do the damage it did and this video says a 757 can't. It's a fact that planes can and do enter and destroy buildings and that not a single building in the world can make a large jetliner bounce off at those speeds.

You want to throw all these facts out the door to believe the purposeful disinformation? Wow, another one get's sucked into the disinfo cult.

Originally posted by mosey
i pride myself with common sense

I hope you still have your receipt because you need to get your money back. And it doesn't really take common sense when all you need is some simple research.

AGAIN.
completely ignore everything i say and throw out random parts of the video you thought were wrong.
sure, a plane can go through a building...
NOT THAT #ING ONE.
if you think aluminum can slice through that much steel, theres no point in arguing.

Originally posted by mosey
sure, a plane can go through a building...
NOT THAT #ING ONE.
if you think aluminum can slice through that much steel, theres no point in arguing.

Ah, so now planes can go through buildings everywhere in the world except the WTC towers as they were magical.

By the way, the planes didn't slice through steel. The steel perimeter columns broke at the connectors. The steel columns themselves didn't fail. Only the connectors failed. Of course, you'd know this had that amazing common sense of yours told you to do some sort of research before typing such things out of your keyboard.

reply to post by _BoneZ_


my common sense clicked on when i noticed every video and picture showing a jet made of pressurized aluminum vanish through steel columns and cement, showing NO SIGN OF BREAKAGE on either the jet or the surface it hit.
this is literally the last time i reply to you, but you basically have to be extremely naive and ignorant, or blind... or an employee of a major news outlet.
good luck catchin ol' Bin there buddy!!

PEACE

Originally posted by _BoneZ_

]

Do you care to explain this picture please??

This is what confuses me about the debunking of the " no plane theory", who can debunk this image??....NO ONE!!
Its a fake image that we were all fed on the day by the MSM!!!!!!

EXPLAIN please someone!!