It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
en.wikipedia.org...
* Lamarckism challenged by Darwinian evolution, but revitalised in Neo-Lamarckism - see also epigenetic inheritance
* Maternal impression - rendered obsolete by genetic theory, but see fetal origins of adult disease
* Miasma theory of disease - rendered obsolete by germ theory of disease
* Spontaneous generation superseded by "biogenesis" and "abiogenesis".
* Telegony (pregnancy) - the theory that an offspring can inherit characteristics from a previous mate of its mother's, as well as its actual parents. A theory often associated with Racism.
* Recapitulation theory - or "ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny"
I do agree about him and in my humble opinion he is either a fraud or has deluded himself into believing his own fantasy. If it walks like a duck.
Originally posted by OhZone
For those of you who ridicule Sitchin for whatever reason, some who have not even read his books, you should visit this link:
ridiculed and vindicated mavericks
Originally posted by SaviorComplex on page 9:
"....Would end up posting this pic to target those he does not agree with..."
Originally posted by CoolBlackHole
Originally posted by GoldenFleece
I'm not saying this will work for everyone, but I've personally found that the truth about any given subject is pretty much 180 degrees from whatever "OzWeatherman" says it is.
The fact that he's one of the biggest chemtrail debunkers on this board should tell you everything you need to know. The same could be said about Zecharia Sitchin.
Originally posted by Chadwickus
So you two aren't getting your way so you resort to attacking the OP?
Well done, that really improves your credibility!
Originally posted by CoolBlackHole
Dear Savior of enlightment
Originally posted by CoolBlackHole
1. I will gladly help with the cumbersome interpretation of the ‘3 monkeys’ pic. I doesn’t necessarily mean one doesn’t agree with someone not agreeing, but one doesn’t agree with someone not using his eyes/ears… and BRAIN!!
Originally posted by CoolBlackHole
2. Btw it was noticed you merely accidentally forgot to include the link originally placed right after the “3 monkeys” pic...
Originally posted by Dewm0nster
"... Planet X, populated by alien beings who created us for the purpose of mining gold- Because, rather than build machines to do it, they spliced genetics with a species from another planet; comes around every 3,600 years or so? And, its orbit, takes it out past pluto; however the inhabitants of the planet, needed gold for their atmosphere, for what purpose? How much radiation of UV light do they need to block out, when they're past Pluto's orbit? ... Having said that, I'd like to compare it to another possible theory: He's lying.... Hard choice, I know.
Originally posted by CoolBlackHole
We have to look at an author’s main insights. And one of Sitchin’s is human genes were gravely manipulated in the past and mingled with extraterrestrial genes in a certain degree. Now, everybody looking into this and doing some research will found out there is quite a nice bit of astonishing evidence for it. I’m not going into further details at this point, as this thread seems almost ‘dead’, sorry (though not because of its contents or posts, but obviously because of it’s title).
Originally posted by CoolBlackHole
Sitchin is not “lying”.
Originally posted by CoolBlackHole
And one of Sitchin’s is human genes were gravely manipulated in the past and mingled with extraterrestrial genes in a certain degree. Now, everybody looking into this and doing some research will find out there is quite a nice bit of astonishing evidence for it...
The recovered records place the location of the Anunnaki laboratory where the first humans were literally produced in east central Africa just above their gold mines. This falls precisely on the map where the mitochondrial DNA “search for Eve” places the first woman Homo Sapiens and in the same period. (The gold mining engineers of Africa have found 100,000-year-old gold mines in that area.) The evidence for, and description of advanced genetic engineering is all there in the ancient documents. Our rapid progress from inception to going to Mars soon, after only 250,000 years, does not correspond to the million year periodicities of slow evolutionary development of other species such as Homo Erectus before us. As so many thinkers have pointed out, we are radically and anomalously
different, as discussed in part three.