It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by allfornaught
reply to post by booda
But what is it ??
Noone else found the same in another pic yet ??
Look at this roll AS17-137-XXXX
It is there ..and it can be seen ..LOOK
Originally posted by spines
As the picture is in black and white (I think), and the anamoly is a green blade of light...I am going to guess it has something to do with the camera itself.
Unless the image isn't in black and white?
Originally posted by YourForever
Interesting.
Definitely no lens flare. Looks like something spilt on the negative.
On the other hand, it is in the dead center of the frame, which tends to indicate it is a real object that the photographer wanted to document.
It is small enough to of been overlooked by NASA airbrushers/sorters.
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Deaf Alien
The green is in a shadow yet appears very bright. Very likely a film flaw or scanning artifact. Here is another view of the same boulder, more distant.
www.hq.nasa.gov...
Originally posted by ngchunter
perhaps a fiber which fell on the negative during the scanning process
Originally posted by ngchunter
So is the rock itself, which dominates much more of the frame.
Originally posted by ngchunter
What airbrushers/sorters? I wasn't aware they employed such people...
Originally posted by YourForever
That much is obvious. The rock is also partially framed, out of focus, and taken from an innapropriate angle filled with shadows. It is true however that their photography was much lamented.
There is video testimony in the disclosure project, among others, if you are interested in that side of things.