Pics that make me wonder

ikeep this short ..
buried my head in nasa archives for ages ,...
I would like to know what is this

history.nasa.gov...


I have an enhanced copy but i want you 1st to look at this and tell me what is this ..


[edit on 31-10-2008 by riseandshine]

Is there any particular part of the picture we are supposed to be looking at?

From what I can see without the answer to the above, is just a rock. The only other thing worth mentioning is the texture of the rock. It looks like it has a sandy texture to it, almost like coral.

Apart from that, nothing.

There's a green plant there. Looks like grass blades. Where is this supposed to be?

reply to post by CosmicEgg


Oh yes did not see that. You can't see it from the zoomed out view but if you zoom in on the shadow on the rock there does appear to be a grass like blade coming out of the rock.

Trick of the light maybe?

Where do you see a plant? Maybe I am just not seeing it.

I do see something that resembles an impression of some sort. Like something was pressed down in that spot.

[edit on 31-10-2008 by Doom and Gloom]

As the picture is in black and white (I think), and the anamoly is a green blade of light...I am going to guess it has something to do with the camera itself.

Unless the image isn't in black and white?

Looks like just a rock to me. What do you think it is?

For those wondering: Make the image fullsize, go to the very large shadow and you will see a green strip of something.

I still think its a camera issue, or something along those lines. Unless the photo isn't in black and white.

I think that is a camera trick with the light.

If you look carefully at it, it seems to kindof fade a little off to the side of the "blade".

Just my 2 cents.

Cropped original


Brightness/contrast adjusted


Most interesting indeed.





(image tags)

Mod Note: Forum Image Linking Policy – Please Review This Link.

[edit on 31/10/08 by Jbird]

looks like its against the rock, I wonder if its a bioluminescent plant, or a experiment in bioluminescence.

There is also an odd indentation in the ground below it, but it doesn't look like a footprint, maybe it is an indentation made from some equipment or tools. This ground oddity could from investigating the plant, or from doing an experiment in bioluminescence.



[edit on 31-10-2008 by star in a jar]

Right guys

I have searched the internet and iam not the only one apparently foudn this ...


Someone even used it in a vid ...
Anyway ...these pics drive me nuts I have numerous funny pics ..and Really I think we are lied to for decades

There is NO way out fo this one ..
I want an answer and guess what I never will get one

WHAT IS IT!!??
A plant ..?
Really ridiculous how they where looking at bolders apparently over 3 days ..
LIES nothing but lies ?
I cannot believ the BS excusses people on ats come up wiht to cover NASA's lies why??

reply to post by Deaf Alien


The green is in a shadow yet appears very bright. Very likely a film flaw or scanning artifact. Here is another view of the same boulder, more distant.
www.hq.nasa.gov...

reply to post by CosmicEgg



A green plant??? Where? It's the moon.

Oh wait, I get it, you don't believe it.

reply to post by Phage


That was quick. Yep, it appears that you are correct.

reply to post by Phage


Well the dune buggy in the background there has color so I'm thinking it's not a flaw.

Where there's smoke, there's fire. Color in two pics. Plants love boulders. It's worth trying to find other stuff NASA airbrush artists missed.

And hell, there are shoe prints all over that place. Why are they taking grass to the moon and getting it stuck on their shoes? That makes even less sense.

[edit on 31/10/2008 by CosmicEgg]

It looks to me that the rock has cracked open and inside the rock there is a luminescent glow, perhaps.

Very interesting photo!

Another, a bit more detail in the shadow.
www.hq.nasa.gov...

[edit on 31-10-2008 by Phage]

reply to post by Phage


I only see the green streak in 20925 though. Do you concur? I'm thinking it's a small filament that got on the emulsion during scanning. It'd be nice if we could find another source of a high resolution scan of 20925.

reply to post by ngchunter


I agree. Nothing seems to appear in the two other photos but they are more distant and don't show the same level of detail.


With the increase in the contrast and brightness of 20925 you can see that the green coloration is smeared between the two "leaves" and again a bit to the right at the top of the green. It appears to be "streaked."

Here's another scan of 20925. Lower res but the green doesn't appear to be there.



[edit on 31-10-2008 by Phage]


Mod Note: Forum Image Linking Policy – Please Review This Link.

[edit on 31/10/08 by Jbird]