It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The June job losses also were far worse than the forecast of a loss of 365,000 jobs by economists surveyed by Briefing.com.
The unemployment rate rose for the ninth straight month, climbing to 9.5 percent from 9.4 percent, and hitting another 26-year high. Economists had been expecting the unemployment rate to hit 9.6 percent.
Originally posted by Rockpuck
Just following up on some irregularities with the mere .1 percent increase in Unemployment U3 (which is complete BS) ... take a look:
The June job losses also were far worse than the forecast of a loss of 365,000 jobs by economists surveyed by Briefing.com.
The unemployment rate rose for the ninth straight month, climbing to 9.5 percent from 9.4 percent, and hitting another 26-year high. Economists had been expecting the unemployment rate to hit 9.6 percent.
www.cnn.com...
What interesting (Aside from the name of the article which is "Obama sees job figures 'sobering' ........................ Anyways.. what's interesting is as follows:
Economist predicted a net loss of 365,000 jobs .. and a .2% increase in unemployment from 9.4 to 9.6% ...
Instead.. we lost 467,000 jobs, a hundred thousand more than what was predicted, 1/3 more in fact.. and we only had a .1% increase?
To top it all off, initial claims for unemployment fell.
"Fuzzy math" or straight up lying through your teeth?
Putting it another way may make it look absurd to those who doubt:
90.5 percent of American's are still employed, and have not been effected by the depression aside from a shorter work week.
The mountain of debt easily could become the next full-fledged economic crisis without firm action from Washington, economists of all stripes warn.
"Unless we demonstrate a strong commitment to fiscal sustainability in the longer term, we will have neither financial stability nor healthy economic growth," Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke recently told Congress.
Higher taxes, or reduced federal benefits and services — or a combination of both — may be the inevitable consequences.
Global stock markets have rallied so far and so fast this year that it is difficult to imagine they can proceed further at anywhere near their recent pace. But what if, after a correction, they proceeded inexorably higher?
U.S. housing prices will fall by a double-digit percentage from already beaten-down levels, resulting in an overall 40 percent plunge by the time foreclosures peak in the second half of 2010, Barclays Capital economist Michelle Meyer said.
AP
Meyer issued her forecast two days after the Standard & Poor's/Case-Shiller Home Price Indexes showed for April an 18.1 percent year-to-year decline, compared with 18.7 percent in March, in the rate of home price declines in 20 major U.S. metropolitan areas.
The indexes have tracked the prices of U.S. single-family homes since 1987.
Originally posted by marg6043
reply to post by RetinoidReceptor
Should we trust the man that helped kill the America economy?
I will have to differ with him because obviously he is dreaming,
I wonder what equity he is talking about, perhaps the government program that is allowing people borrow more than their homes are worth it to keep afloat, when I saw the news on the government authorizing home owners to borrow more than the existing value of homes I thought it was a joke but is true.
US Home Prices Seen Falling 40% Overall: Analyst
U.S. housing prices will fall by a double-digit percentage from already beaten-down levels, resulting in an overall 40 percent plunge by the time foreclosures peak in the second half of 2010, Barclays Capital economist Michelle Meyer said.
AP
Meyer issued her forecast two days after the Standard & Poor's/Case-Shiller Home Price Indexes showed for April an 18.1 percent year-to-year decline, compared with 18.7 percent in March, in the rate of home price declines in 20 major U.S. metropolitan areas.
The indexes have tracked the prices of U.S. single-family homes since 1987.
I think Greenspan is becoming senile.
www.cnbc.com...
Originally posted by marg6043
You know I am not economic expert and I don't claim I am but something doesn't add here. Isn't that the reason that volume of trading is so low? I am wrong?.
But what if, after a correction, they proceeded inexorably higher?
Originally posted by Rockpuck
All in all, this will only mean the further deterioration of the Dollar, giving up all the ground we gained from the World currencies collapsing in on them selves..
He still has to watch what he says.. but if you read between the lines he's basically saying... We may be shooting for a correction .. but we may miss the target entirely..
Also he states that banks will either need the housing market to recover or share prices to rise in order to get capital in order to lend. So I guess he believes banks need more money without actually saying that...