posted on Oct, 12 2008 @ 06:13 PM
reply to post by boaby_phet
originally it was christian faith based
then we had the whole seperation of church from state deal and it went to common values
you swear on what ever book your perticular faith considers holy christians the bible jews the torrah muslims the koran
ok so if we have 2 legal systems
if i can get the justice i want under the laws of sharia court but not under mainstream law i would simply use sharia to get what i want ... the fact
im not muslim has nothing to do with it, if its a legal system then i have a right to access to it, not allowing me to makes it discrimanating system
so i can then sue shaira law courts so they are forced to handel none muslim cases as well
but if im not allowed to use sharia court then that should mean muslims arnt allowed to use mainstream law either
we now have 2 systems forced to work independantly for 2 seperate groups of people
the law is based on common values of the people of greatbritain what ever religeous values they hold make no differance(or shouldnt at any rate) can
the same be said of sharia courts
and again how far should they be allowed to take the law system? what point does sharia stop and mainstream take over? would allowing some but not all
of sharia law be anti-islamic?
[edit on 12/10/08 by noobfun]