It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by 44soulslayer
[
These are people that dont work whatsoever. They exist on income given to them by the state, which in turn is taken from those who actually do the jobs you outlined above.
Sorry for double posting, i just had to point this massive distinction out.
These people? To you the offenders are the lazy sods who up your tax bill. Do you decide who the undesirable are? Do I?
Originally posted by 44soulslayer
reply to post by Merigold
Lets make no bones about it, these people are undesirable elements in society.
Our dear nanny state is actually affecting the balance of evolution in our country. The rich are penalised by excessive taxes and driven out of the country, while the "undesirable" elements are given benefit after benefit while they contribute nothing.
Can you see how this is a gross injustice?
Thus the optimal solution to stop dysgenics in society would be to end the benefits culture. There is no reason why hard working folk should subsidize the work-shy. For me to have to subsidize the pointless benefits given to women such as Shannon Matthews' mother is a forthright slap to my face, and its making me want to leave this country every time i take a look at my tax return.
Originally posted by dawnstar
Originally posted by 44soulslayer
[
These are people that dont work whatsoever. They exist on income given to them by the state, which in turn is taken from those who actually do the jobs you outlined above.
Sorry for double posting, i just had to point this massive distinction out.
one in ten people in ohio recieve food stamps......
the one's that aren't working at least some, are by far quite few I believe...and well....I got a feeling they are mostly single moms with young children. if they are, well, they ARE working, or at least if they aren't their kids should be taken from them for negligence....but raising kids IS a full time job in and of itself!
one of the problems with society is that they don't recognize this work as anything meaningful!
and by the way, this welfare to work crap is costing us more in the long run that it is saving! a person has three kids and is told to go out and find a job, throw them in childcare, which the state pays three dollars (or more) per kid for, the person only makes $7, credit is given to transportation expense, clothing expense, and meals at work.......their new benefits are higher than they were when she wasn't working!
Originally posted by Merigold
These people? To you the offenders are the lazy sods who up your tax bill. Do you decide who the undesirable are? Do I?
So the rich are somehow better then the poor? They are more desirable? Where do I fit in? I'm not rich nor poor, but if I lost my job today I might have to get on benefits. Does that mean I should be sterilized because I aa potential user of benefits?
I have to agree that I don't like funding the lazy. When I first got to this country I had to work my ass off to get on my feet. I actually applied for JSA but by the time I finally got the 40 quid I'd already found a job. The first 6 months I slept in a hostel, ate mayonassie sandwhiches and saved every penny I could. Now I pay more in taxes per month then I made working in pub 12 hours per day for the first 6 months I was here.
I can't really argue with your comment abut how this may be effecting the balance of evolution, my argument is simply that if we were to allow Shannon Matthews to be sterilized where will we stop? Who else will be classed undesirable?
Originally posted by 44soulslayer
Just because someone had a child they couldnt afford why should i be penalised for it?
Originally posted by Merigold
I believe that it is our responsibility as civilized beings to help those less fortunate then we might be.
Originally posted by Merigold
Originally posted by 44soulslayer
Just because someone had a child they couldnt afford why should i be penalised for it?
You shouldn't be penalized, however wouldn't the world be a nicer place if we actually gave a crap about our neighbors?
I find it distrubing that people just don't care anymore about anyone but themselves.
If you're poor it's your own fault, Who cares if your kids are hungry?
if you're fat, too bad, I shouldn't have to pay taxes so you can get health care
I read this on ATS everyday and it really depresses me that as a people we just don't care about each other anymore.
I believe that it is our responsibility as civilized beings to help those less fortunate then we might be.
Originally posted by 44soulslayer
If I could bring myself out of poverty, then anyone should be able to.
I will not accept the burden of those unwilling to work. I am all for charity when it comes to helping those who have been dealt a worse hand than me, but I refuse to help those who wont help themselves.
Originally posted by sty
Solution - the help should be provided, and the amount should be based on the effort of the family to produce high-quality citisens. Did anyone ever proposed to change all the benefits into a scheme based on school-results? it would motivate parents and kids !
Originally posted by Rockpuck
And a full repeal of ANY benefit to ANYONE who has kids.. why the hell is the Gov handing out money just for having kids???
Why not take the money we give to the trash and give it to the Middle income family with 3 kids who will all go to college and be productive citizens?