It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
According to public statements made by US officials, this unsafeguarded heavy water reactor generates an estimated 8-10 kilotons of weapons grade plutonium per year, which is enough for one to two nuclear weapons. The reactor could also produce tritium if it were loaded with lithium-6. According to J. Cirincione of Carnegie, Khusab's plutonium production capacity could allow Pakistan to develop lighter nuclear warheads that would be easier to deliver with a ballistic missile.
India has not signed the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) or the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). India is a member of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), and four of its 13 nuclear reactors are subject to IAEA safeguards.
Originally posted by Harlequin
India has not signed the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) or the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). India is a member of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), and four of its 13 nuclear reactors are subject to IAEA safeguards.
which means that 9 reactors are not subject to inspections.....
so all this about iran? pot , kettle , black.
Originally posted by Harlequin
aye there going nuts over 1 reactor when i reality the entire IAEA inspections are pointless as the `signatories` ignore it mostly anyway;
`hey we got 32 reactors but you can visit these 5`.
waste of time.
Just think of these nukes as Pakistan's jugular vein.
Could you define instability so that I can shed more light on that?
This command and control structure is based on the US model as well as setup with US help.
Originally posted by jackinthebox
Obviously the situtation has changed some, for the time being, but I still stand behind my general premise that Pakistani nukes are a "loose-cannon" that the US certainly mustr figure into their strategy. Also keep in mind that the US is the master of the false-flag attack, and could manipulate the deployment of Pakistani nukes in accordance with their will, as opposed to taking direct action to control them. But if it really came down to it, I have no doubt that the US could in fact seize those weapons if so desired.
Originally posted by hitman666
The Pakistani nukes will only disappear if India gets rid of them as well. In fact, Pakistan has acknowledged in the past that it's willing to dismantle the lot if India does too.
Deep inside I hope that someday this region gets rid of these nasty weapons.