It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Mclane
I'm old enough to remember watching these things happen in the first place.
I so want to see that we did make that huge leap but when you get older and you start seeing debatable notions ie Verner initially saying you would need a massive craft way bigger than the Apollo that he himself designed it makes you wonder just a little.
Originally posted by Astyanax
The tyranny of Truth.
How sad that the voices of ignorance, delusion and mendacity have grown so loud they have even made you doubt the evidence of your own eyes and ears.
Woe unto us all when Truth is brought low by the rabble of the Web. When I read posts like yours I wonder whether it is not already too late.
a pretty substantial rumor that the old USSR tried a moon landing, but couldn't get the cosmonauts back from the Lunar surface.
Originally posted by cdrn
As for the answer to the original question, no.
The Japanese probe (Kaguya) has a resolution of around 10 m, while the Chinese one (Chang'e 1) has a resolution of around 50 m. None of the Apollo artifacts are that big.
Wait until Oct. 2008, when the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter will be launched. It will have a resolution of 0.5 m and will be able to comfortably image the LM descent stages, rovers and possibly some of the surface experiments left there.
Of course, that won't be enough to deter the wackos. "Oh, NASA must be faking these images too! See how they don't show the secret alien base that definitely exists there?"
Originally posted by Mclane
3. There's proof of the landing but do they disclose it?