It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Terra Nuovo Umanita
Any information dealing with war time operations, and the people there in involved is considered secret.
Originally posted by Terra Nuovo Umanita
Anyone involved in "friendly fire" incidents in war or peace time, under any form of accusation deserves a fair court procedure.
..Others are upset about what they feel is the inadequate response of US President George W Bush to the incident.
He made several public appearances in the hours after the news broke, but only made a brief statement after he was asked a question by a journalist.
Source
...NATO said the aircraft had engaged friendly forces during a strafing run, using cannons.
"I'm not sure who brought them in and for what reason," said Abthorpe, a member of the Royal Canadian Regiment.
"It wasn't us, of course. We were getting prepped to go out but our first air mission wasn't scheduled until 30 minutes later.
Source
Originally posted by WestPoint23
Besides, I don't see how you could possibly think that out investigation would be less thorough?
As for all the extreme centric pro European comments, just remember your past...
Originally posted by Terra Nuovo Umanita
we did indeed, very long ago, try to invade Canada, and they whupped us a new one. I am not one to deny facts, I am simply stating that situations are complicated.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
As for all the extreme centric pro European comments, just remember your past...
Originally posted by cavscout
Fratricide happens. All the time.
It hurts the soldiers who committed the fratricide worse than the soldiers that died. There is no reason to make them talk about it so soon, except to their brothers in arms.
Anyone who has suffered from PTSD knows what I am saying, the rest of you need to keep your noses out of war. If you don’t like it that your citizens are dying from friendly fire then don’t let your politicians go to war! If you are going to allow your nation to go war, then stay out of it and let the professionals handle it.
There are things that go on in the human mind after combat, especially after an incident like this, that none of you who havnt seen war will ever understand. Dont be so cold as to wish these soldiers have to relive a moment more horrible than any of you have ever seen.
Stay in your lane. Let the military handle the war and you go handle the restaurant or office you work in.
Don’t like that? Then don’t send us to fight.
[edit on 29-8-2007 by cavscout]
Originally posted by neformore
Americans would be royally pissed if a UK unit wiped out an American one in a "friendly fire" incident and the UK turned round and told the US investigators it wouldn't release the personnel to give evidence or appear at hearings - and you know thats true.
Originally posted by Chorlton
...but simply about them giving evidence at an inquest, to clarify matters.
Originally posted by Chorlton
Some parents want to know how their sons were slaughtered by gung ho, trigger happy pilots.
Originally posted by Chorlton
...if you can point me to any evidence for US soldiers being tried for friendly fire against UK soliders?
Originally posted by infinite
You mean creating international courts and enforcing the rule of law?
Originally posted by infinite
We don't whitewash in Europe, we face our crimes.
Originally posted by infinite
I mean, you didn't sign the ICC treaty because your "perfect" troops would be in the Hague for Abu Ghraib and Fallujah abuse.
Originally posted by John Percival Hackworth
Assuming of course, you guys actually BOTHER to investigate...
Originally posted by devilwasp
Then how come there has been no news or updates concerning this investigation of the US's.....
Originally posted by devilwasp
...yet the US originally refused to allow the release of the video of the two american jets attacking the british forces...
The Pentagon is sensitive about friendly fire incidents, particularly those involving British troops. It regards US airmen as unfairly stereotyped as trigger-happy.
It is still angry over the leaking earlier this year of a classified video it sent to Britain for the inquest into the death of Lance Corporal Matty Hull, killed by a US air attack in Iraq in 2003.
Guardian
Originally posted by devilwasp
Also the pentagon has been known to be less than truthful concerning friendly fire incidents...shall we remember Corporal Tillmans "Heroic" death?
Originally posted by devilwasp
...wasnt it your own country that tried to annex canada?
Originally posted by SKUNK2
...could imagine a British soldier accidently killing an American!!! They would get strung up and shipped of to America that fast his feet wouldn't even touch the floor...
Originally posted by SKUNK2
...look at that poor bloke that hacked Nasa and is serving 75 years in jail...