It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
and yes, honestly i was a little surprised by number's comment to look for evidence of compositing instead of perspective issues.
Originally posted by s_q_t
Hey, I've also had the honor to be called a déboulo-whatever on OVNIS (not to mention an idiot by Lev)--what do I win??
Originally posted by nfotech
See, now here's someone who knows I was dead serious in standing up for the drone proponents. I wasn't play acting to get access, was I SQT? I kind of wish I were, now. It would be a much better story than explaining I was hoodwinked for a while.
Originally posted by CFandM
and yes, honestly i was a little surprised by number's comment to look for evidence of compositing instead of perspective issues.
But would they really look that hard for it?
img341.imageshack.us...
img144.imageshack.us...
Originally posted by Springer
"Every single legitimate, credentialed expert I have discussed the "drones" with who has looked at these images has labeled them CGI, these drones only exist in computers, this CRAP is a HOAX."
Originally posted by nfotech
reply to post by s_q_t
Go back and read the last 3 pages or so of this thread, it'll blow your mind.
Shad - I've sent an email asking for clarification on your ban as well as certain other recent events. I don't see why you should be banned for posting a skeptical POV in a dedicated skeptics thread. I notice the DRT is allowed to post their POV in that same thread.
I'm starting to notice that anytime mention of a book or media deal is made the thread is locked. I guess it's a subject with bad juju on it or perhaps a sensitive topic?
I agree this case and it's handling have the potential to damage ufology. Imagine the fallout should the perpetrator show up on TV tomorrow, laughing about how gullible those UFO nuts are. We are not powerless though. If the DRT and friends can use the media to present their case then so can we.....
It would be a huge mistake on their part to assume there is no interest in an expose'. I'm finding quite a few parties are sick of this charade and want to see a clear, logical reporting of the facts.
Originally posted by yourrolemodel
What are DRT and OM?