It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by tomiuk
Originally posted by nfotech
I have an email here from a certain lady, in it she tells me what a wonderful person I am and how intelligent and capable I am, how helpful, etc, etc. Apparently that too only applies so long as I believe in the magic drones.... What? You say you were told the exact same thing by her? And you, and you? Word for word? Hmmm...
That's the very definition of dis-ingenuousness, now isn't it?
If it's not, I think you just kicked over the wrong rock, my dear.
Well, since you have brought up our communications, please remember I also have your emails to expose as well..
Next, everyone who writes to me gets the same treatment, yes, that's correct. I usually start out believing that the person writing to me is genuine.. I'm nice back. I'm sympathetic enough to say, yes we have deeper research going on, that keeps us going towards the non-hoax side.. after a while, when they realise I can't disclose everything we know or bring them in, I see public attacks about us posted on ATS....
Originally posted by nfotech
boom, droppin the post.
Originally posted by tomiuk
Originally posted by nfotech
boom, droppin the post.
You have a hell of a cheek. But that's more or less what all of you are about here anyway. We release as much information and well founded research as we can present it.
You refuse to release any substantive information about your drone photo research because it would "cause confusion"..
Now you make demands..
unbelievable..
Originally posted by Sys_Config
She's baiting you man she knows what the deal is. Maybe she is hoping the thread gets locked like they do at OM when the questioning gets Real and the answers get scarce. Maybe enough ugly posts and viewers wont read here anymore. Agitate and Poison the waters with static. I truly hope she gets what she deserves, a denial of this forum as a stepping stone to keep promoting the Drone via dribble. She should promote over at DRT. thats where it rests decomposing , despite the laughable attempts at rescuscitation.
On behalf of all the ARC members Tomi
The thing you once spent pages saying it wasnt Levs and it was despite reliable people saying otherwise.
Please go home to DRT and Thump this!
ovnis-usa.com...
Originally posted by Sys_Config
@DRDil, Thank you for bringing up that Alignment problem with the Drone posing for the Camera shooter, that Sp33 caught. I always want to acknowldge my sources and we are all in this together.
Originally posted by Sys_Config
You mean tomi's been like....?
[snip]
This isn't an obsession, its a doggone recreational activity!
Dr.Dil, tell us not you too..
Originally posted by nfotech
reply to post by Sys_Config
By the time the book comes out I expect the laws of optical physics to be fully re-written. We will all be able to hover above the power lines on that fine day.
~sorry about the evil bastard thing, by the way. Like I said once upon a time, I'm wrong about a lot of things but I fight hard for each and every one.
Originally posted by spf33
reply to post by Sys_Config
Thanx sp33 for coming, I copied your analysis or what I could given space, into the comments , section, and felt it was complete. The post here was only an excerpt of that.I just thought it odd that so many oddities appeared for a aspontaneous unplanned snapshot.. The purpose also was to demonstrate the reactions to your comment, which cannot be denied.
It wasn't until you said you dont care, as long it falls within "reason" did numbers seem to end his panic attack. The posting of a 1 degree variation, may 2 , from a straigt perpindicualr as Numbers attempted and claiming, there you see? was laughable if it were not so sad. Which is why he ran litterally to the other fotoss to find the proper angles. Just as DRT likes to comment on the experts, and revise the history and timleines and witnesses, I think we can at least from the peanut gallery call it as we see from here on on the reactions and stateof minds. .And like it or not, we know what we saw in those exchanges. No reflection absolutely on you sp33, your work is really great, considering the material you are working which at best is 50 50 as you say, and ultimately that is what DRT wishes to say, no body knows, totally inconclusive. but worthy of more and more tests, except by independent lab sources. I certainly won't ask you what is your conclusion, as you are still working.
It was the panic attack by numbers and his squirming that fascinated us. He is already on record saying he would hesitate at the truth. He tried recently to dodge that. His words did not lie then. And he most certainly did try to redirect you to composting insteadd of image proportions. There was no mis understanding thereSP
Thank you for coming. and you are always always welcome here. I do not envy your shoes but I honestly wish you
Good luck
Sincerely
Addendum
@Springer,It is like quick sand , the more Didier and Dave L (numbers) move and wiggle. and banter, the more they sink themselves and everyone around them. It looks funny for men to wiggle so much I think No Yes?
As for Tomi, yes I have grown accustomed now, I just keep the bleach handy anyhow
Originally posted by Sys_Config
reply to post by Sys_Config
Originally posted by nfotech
If I wanted to damage your case I could make one phone call and your future media exposure would be over.
Originally posted by onthefence55
Originally posted by nfotech
If I wanted to damage your case I could make one phone call and your future media exposure would be over.
What are the details of your idle threat?
[edit on 3-6-2008 by onthefence55]
I'll say it again so they can get it right,
"Every single legitimate, credentialed expert I have discussed the "drones" with who has looked at these images has labeled them CGI, these drones only exist in computers, this CRAP is a HOAX."