It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by parry noid
Here, since you obviously dont know history...
Does this not seem like 9/11 and the patriot act?
how about this bill signed by bush?
I don't care if you dont want to see the facts, I'm writing this to those who want to see them.
Originally posted by darkbluesky
DG, When President Bush leaves office next year, and his successor recinds all of his Draconian laws and directives will you admit you may have been a wee bit paranoid?
You know what would be even better? If we could find out who's really calling the shots, and see to it that they don't get to anymore. The president can't do this alone I'm afraid. He needs help from somewhere. I'd like to know from where, and from whom.
Originally posted by Vitchilo
And darkbluesky, you're lying to yourself if you think that Hillary or Guiliani will repel anything that Bush gave himself. The only one that can save the situation is Ron Paul, all others are neo-cons.
Originally posted by ShadowEyes
He ALLOWED an entire American city to drown for crying out loud! He knew it was coming, and knew it at least five days before Katrina made landfall. The wealthy had no problem getting out in time, but the poor, which he has NO USE FOR were left to fend for themselves! Five days notice was plenty of time to evacuate those poor souls, but he was too busy playing air guitar while Kindasleeza was buying shoes.
Originally posted by Vitchilo
TheBorg: I understand you, but Ron Paul is NOT receiving money from corporate interests, he's only receiving from people. Proof of that: he only got around 600.000$ compare to the 30 millions of Hillary and Obama.
Let's assume that this is the case though. What's going to happen when the election goes his way? The same thing that happened in 2000; the people in charge of assuring the pre-decided candidate makes it will botch the electoral votes so that the one they want to win does so. We'll have to wait and see though. I do hope you're right though.
Originally posted by parry noid
Here, since you obviously dont know history...
Originally posted by Vitchilo
Anyway, Al Gore was a neo-con too back in 00, so it would be a first timer if Ron Paul is elected. If he's leading in the polls and he lose, it will be riots, because now, people now that Ron Paul is the only one not corrupt, the only one that can save america and for the first time in history, BOTH the congress and the president are hated by the american people... We could see very interesting things in 08 if Ron Paul is nominee or running third party.
Originally posted by Inannamute
See, G. HW Bush. Clinton. GW Bush. Clinton?
Pretty pattern... leaving you with almost a quarter century of the same two groups in office..
Originally posted by Demetre
Ahhh, and so it begins. Betcha there'll be a 'catastrophe', oh say, right before '08 elections. Betcha He won't step down. He's testing Our reaction. How kind of Him to ease Us into a dictatorship.
Grover, I think what you are referring to are the PDD (Presdiential Decision Directive) and about 10 Executive Orders that Jack Kennedy wrote in 1962 during the Cuban Missle Crisis to take over all government, public and even private utilities, banks, transportation, etc. in the event of a catastrophic emergency Those are still in effect, since executive orders do not expire with the end of their authors tenure in the WH.