My opinion, fake.
But now, I want to know something from the general reader...
In almost every ufo analysis post, there are people fiddling with the image colours, the rgb values, etc.. What are they trying to prove?
Its not like a youtube video or any other video on the internet is going to reveal anything extra, because the technology used to put it on the
internet removes anything of importance.
Even with the original footage, unless that footage was taken by equipment capable of capturing a lot more than your average joe has, it wont make a
jot of difference.
Its just hocus pocus for the not so cluey.
For instance, another thread, someone was going on about highliting the magnetic fields from a jpeg, and showing how the contours of the image proved
said image was real.
Comeon... I think it's all a load of baloney to get people who think it sounds neat, to be swayed.
The more effects I see effects like that (and anyone can invert, split rgb, enhance, border trace anything, sharpen, et al) the more my spidey senses
A youtube video is as good as youtube.
If this guy were attacked by a UFO then
1 - its a small little bugger, and from where it was in the sky, it shrunk quite fast.
2 - Im sure the first place I'd alert my alien attack is youtube, and not the authorities.
3 - where is he now ?
Can ATS obtain server space for uncompressed storage of smaller original footage/images, to do away with the poor quality bootube stuff ? 3 million
posts must mean something changes !!
OP, good for thinking tho mate, always worth a post imo. I just fall off the horse on this one..