It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Many of you may be thinking…."but eyewitnesses are unreliable". Although this may be the case in many scenarios; there are quite a few things that make this testimony particularly credible and strong.
1) The high level of corroboration from independent accounts.
(we will present 4 separate accounts all corroborating each other while not being contradicted by a single other witness in the entire investigative body of evidence.)
2) The simple right or left nature of their claim.
(They only have to recall what side of the building the plane flew)
3) The perfect vantage point.
(No other witnesses were in a better position to tell on what side of the station the plane flew then the witnesses that were on the station’s property)
4) The high level of credibility of the witnesses themselves.
(The reason for this will be apparent when the identities of the witnesses are revealed.)
5) The fact that their testimony was filmed on location.
(This leaves zero room for misinterpretation of their claims as they are able to re-enact their experience for the camera)
6) The extreme magnitude of the event being something that is virtually impossible to forget.
Number 6 is an important one. Ask yourself where you were on 9/11. Virtually everyone remembers in detail where they were, what they did, and how they felt on that day. Now imagine you were on the CITGO station property just a few feet away from the plane with a perfect view of the Pentagon. Does it seem feasible that you could be completely mistaken as to what side of the station the plane flew? Regardless of how you answer that question none of the witnesses we spoke with believe there is a remote possibility they could be mistaken in this regard.