It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by vK_man
they are definitely not feigning weaknesses.
the bulava is being rushed through .
no weakness is being feigned though it was very well feigned during soviet era, if you are talking about ABM defences like s-300, it is not power or numbers or tech which matters it is the recon,hen house radars are ABM battle managment radars ,
and they are very old .
but, yes civil defence is much better for LEADERSHIP ONLY
,but the recon has deteriorated severely. there has been major change in russian doctrine...
'''WRM: Nevertheless, it seems that your military forces are in such a state that modernization could fail, become too costly or even reach a state where modernization is strategically unintelligent.
IK: The current Russian army is going to be scrapped. We’ll dismantle tanks, aircrafts, navy and so on. Even our nuclear missiles are going to be scrapped. We are preparing for a huge rearmament. Not just another military reform, but building a new fighting force almost from scratch. We plan to finish it before 2010. It will not just be a Russian or Chinese force, .
www.worldthreats.com...
so you understand why bulava is being rushed.. russians are preparing for a major rearmament...
Originally posted by StellarX
Originally posted by vK_man
'''WRM: Nevertheless, it seems that your military forces are in such a state that modernization could fail, become too costly or even reach a state where modernization is strategically unintelligent.
I don't see how anyone who knows what equipment the Russian army operates can agree with this statement. It might serve well to fool a largely ignorant audience and is imo clearly aimed at such ...
IK: The current Russian army is going to be scrapped. We’ll dismantle tanks, aircrafts, navy and so on. Even our nuclear missiles are going to be scrapped. We are preparing for a huge rearmament. Not just another military reform, but building a new fighting force almost from scratch. We plan to finish it before 2010. It will not just be a Russian or Chinese force, .
www.worldthreats.com...
Not sure what to make of such a hopelessly vague and mostly crazy announcement. No country on Earth could rebuild what the Russian army now operates in five or even twenty years and i don't understand why it's even necessary considering the superiority in many instances of those systems over likely counterparts.
Stellar
Ivan krutov was a high level officer in former KGB and acc. to him russian missile forces are in ruins .....
and you are not a intelligience officer , who's dedicated to restoration of communism.... he has links within the GRU....
he's known on NBP websites and sovietempireforum
Originally posted by StellarX
Originally posted by vK_man
,but the recon has deteriorated severely. there has been major change in russian doctrine...
I would like to see what reading material has brought you to this conclusion as i have shown in the past that the Russians have ample passive and active EW assets which would easily warn them of any large scale nuclear attack; limited attacks will be relatively easily blunted by their ABM defenses.
'''WRM: Nevertheless, it seems that your military forces are in such a state that modernization could fail, become too costly or even reach a state where modernization is strategically unintelligent.
I don't see how anyone who knows what equipment the Russian army operates can agree with this statement. It might serve well to fool a largely ignorant audience and is imo clearly aimed at such ...
IK: The current Russian army is going to be scrapped. We’ll dismantle tanks, aircrafts, navy and so on. Even our nuclear missiles are going to be scrapped. We are preparing for a huge rearmament. Not just another military reform, but building a new fighting force almost from scratch. We plan to finish it before 2010. It will not just be a Russian or Chinese force, .
www.worldthreats.com...
Not sure what to make of such a hopelessly vague and mostly crazy announcement. No country on Earth could rebuild what the Russian army now operates in five or even twenty years and i don't understand why it's even necessary considering the superiority in many instances of those systems over likely counterparts.
Stellar
they lost their nuclear advantage and Ivan krutov wass a high level offiecer in KGB
he knows things far better than you
Originally posted by StellarX
[
I don't see how anyone who knows what equipment the Russian army operates can agree with this statement. It might serve well to fool a largely ignorant audience and is imo clearly aimed at such ...
IK: The current Russian army is going to be scrapped. We’ll dismantle tanks, aircrafts, navy and so on. Even our nuclear missiles are going to be scrapped. We are preparing for a huge rearmament. Not just another military reform, but building a new fighting force almost from scratch. We plan to finish it before 2010. It will not just be a Russian or Chinese force, .
www.worldthreats.com...
Not sure what to make of such a hopelessly vague and mostly crazy announcement. No country on Earth could rebuild what the Russian army now operates in five or even twenty years and i don't understand why it's even necessary considering the superiority in many instances of those systems over likely counterparts.
Originally posted by vK_man
they lost their nuclear advantage and Ivan krutov wass a high level offiecer in KGB
he knows things far better than you
and you are not a intelligience officer , who's dedicated to restoration of communism.... he has links within the GRU....
he's known on NBP websites and sovietempireforum
they lost their nuclear advantage and Ivan krutov wass a high level offiecer in KGB
he arsenal of russia is past its life and so its conventional forces
he arsenal of russia is past its life and so its conventional forces
When did they lose it and why do so many western intelligence agencies still credit them with technically superior forces on paper while loudly proclaiming their backwardness and general weakness? Is he doing the same and if so who is he working for
If he really made this claim his clearly not telling the truth.
I know many parties are lying but the pictured i formed after some time investigating the issue leads me to believe that estimations of Russia's strategic nuclear force decline has been greatly exaggerated with no mention of their RF weapons or national ABM defenses which would blunt or simply absorb a American nuclear strike.
Communism was not something Russians wanted to start with and it was imposed on them by outside forces so anyone who is trying to restore such in Russia today should not speak up in intelligent conversation
Originally posted by vK_man
]he arsenal of russia is past its life and so its conventional forces
Stanislav ?
Krutov is a scientist ... read the source i gave you... most russian nuclear arsenal is past its age
its arsenal only 360 ss-19,40 ss-18 ,300 ss-25 and 45 ss-27 remain...
Unless there are nukes stored in yamantau mountain or other underground bases
www.thebulletin.org...
he said in 2003 that CIA has plans for former soviet republics (deploy bases) and cruise missiles he has seen CIA demographic maps and crusie missile beacons...already CIA sponsered colour revolutions have took in ukraine,georgia and they could integrated into NATO (encircelment of russia)....
most conventional forces of russia are beyond service life except tanks(t-72 and t-80 ,artiillery and missiles
Krutov wants a sort of combat force which will make Russia invulnerable..
his website:
thefinalphase.boom.ru...
most nuclear warheads need maintainence unless they are pure fusion red mercury ones.. krutov calls it himoyad in russian.
.again read the source (his interview) i gave u
and there are rumors that to reduce costs russians are removeing nuclear warheads in SAM's and replacing it with virtual cathode oscillator warheads (can create powerful localised EMP fields..) .... officially they state that they are putting conventional warheads...
and S-300 is mainly meant for destroying cruise missiles and medium range missiles ...
Krutov thinks they have lost the capabilty to win a nuclear war after soviet collapse ...
yes he is a maximalist who underestimates russian capability .... and I think you greatly overestimate it..
if it were USSR i would have believed that russia would defeat usa in nuclear war(because of civil defence)
.. but not now
a lot of analysts like nyquist seem to be CIA agents whipping up lies and propaganda
also auroras can carries 6 nukes and could destroy their remaining early warning radars which remain in service ...
most radars are very old also trident d-5 can reach moscow and other northern regions in 8 minutes from norway... there would not enough time to determine or clarify that a nuclear strike is being launched
Today many russian people want a leader like zhukov or stalin and freedom of religion (not atheism forced)
see the economic conditons in many regions of russia is bad(towns and villages),though economy is growing
even orthodox Priests in russia think they need a hybrid system...
sorry i answered late their were some problems and i am mostly on pravda english forum
engforum.pravda.ru...
Originally posted by StellarX
Originally posted by vK_man
]he arsenal of russia is past its life and so its conventional forces
We don't know what's going on the the Yamantau mountains but we don't have to to see that current Russian strategic forces are ( according to western defense establishments figures anyways) superior on the whole not to mention that the USA do not operate a known ABM force while the Russians has thousands.
he said in 2003 that CIA has plans for former soviet republics (deploy bases) and cruise missiles he has seen CIA demographic maps and crusie missile beacons...already CIA sponsered colour revolutions have took in ukraine,georgia and they could integrated into NATO (encircelment of russia)....
his website:
thefinalphase.boom.ru...
Like the Minutemen? If you want to talk about old ICBM's you should look at the current American force structure and possible discover how ironic it is that they withdrew the newer "Peacekeeper' from service while keeping the rest.... Both sides can and do maintain their nuclear forces but only one side is currently deploying road mobile systems that can be reloaded while being almost impossible to find.
Did he really create that website? How old is he as that really does not seem to be the work of a mature well informed person?
Where did he get the idea that one can construct a combat force that is somehow invulnerable? I am getting the distinct impression that your not quoting him very accurately or at all...
superior on the whole not to mention that the USA do not operate a known ABM force while the Russians has thousands.
One of them introduced himself as Colonel Krutov, Commander-in-Chief of RRA Detachments in Moscow and the Moscow Region, the two others, as Chief of Staff Colonel Ublyumkin and RRA Chief Expert Dr. Zaitsev. I asked them several questions and received exhaustive answers.
www.exile.ru...
Zhukov or Stalin? Where did you get that idea from or the one that there is not religious freedom in Russia?
Originally posted by vK_man
yeah , minuteman is being heavily upgrading ,new propulsion and accuracy system... accuracy increased from 220 cep to 120 cep
the diagrams and photos are enough ... not everyone divulges state secrets... like the AYAKS ..
read his articles on xakep , most of his articles are on cybernetics,technocracy and military weapons ... he has many articles on xakep(underground electronic underground electronic magazine, “Hacker”
www.xakep.ru
(tranaslate them )
simple ,acheive a successful first strike .. in fact krutov said in 2003 that they are going concentrate more on smaller subs with long range crusie missiles like kh-101 ,kh-102 etc... kh-102
with marabu stealth generator and also on sub -kt nukes meant to destroy strategic facilties..
these options would be cheaper and cruise missiles with marabu ...
unstoppable
rather no russian recon sys are hoplessly outdated.
and russians are dismantling the tactical nukes and ss-24 (which was a missile capable of low detection probablity as per analysis of krutov and a major technolgical breakthrough has been destroyed)
another interview of krutov:
One of them introduced himself as Colonel Krutov, Commander-in-Chief of RRA Detachments in Moscow and the Moscow Region, the two others, as Chief of Staff Colonel Ublyumkin and RRA Chief Expert Dr. Zaitsev. I asked them several questions and received exhaustive answers.
www.exile.ru...
well, during khrushchev and good part of stalin era
and read more on regions like north ossetia, and southern russia , not on cities , you will understand
Originally posted by StellarX
Not sure how much you can still alter such a basically old system ( Nothing in the Russian strategic arsenal is that old) but i presume one can at least increase accuracy and fuel efficiency and thus increasing overall efficiency?
Originally posted by StellarX
I just do not think it's really cheap to do it this way ( Russia can still afford deploying entirely new strategic weapon systems with it's so called meager funds) but that probably does not matter when you have 500 000 000 000 to waste as efficiently as you can..
Originally posted by WestPoint23
The upgraded Minuteman missile will have little in common with it's classical counterpart, virtually everything (that matters at least) it being upgraded and improved.
Propulsion, guidance warheads, etc... Personally though I find this to be a dumb move on the part of our civilian leadership. We had the state of the art Peacekeeper ready to go into mass production with limited numbers already fielded but for reason I still have yet to fathom we decide to scrap it and waste more money on the LGM-30, which is not even a viable long term system past 2020.
I don’t think it's an issue of money but rather one of doctrine and priority. We still rely on the nuclear triad, air, land and sea, the LGM-30 is good enough and with our other two branches having excellent nuclear capability there is no urgency to replace the Minuteman.
Not saying I agree with that mindset just saying that's how I view it. If we wanted to we could of produced the Peacekeeper or done a one missile fits all thing like you guys by developing a land based version of the Trident II.
The reason Southern Russian has such problems is mainly due to western funding ( then and now) of radical Islamic factions with which to destabilize these majority Islamic provinces of the former USSR. The )
After reading that i am felt i have wasted my time actually treating Krutev as a informed party
There is no relation. These projects are not connected and will be implemented in different situations. If we succeed in re-constructing Communism in Russia before American re-armament, we will use Yamantau Mountain. If not, Yamantau Mountain will still be in control of Russian Federation forces, and we will have to speed the process by launching the Sovietia project. You don’t understand a simple thing: Not all military preparation processes (Yamantau Mountain, Uragan Defense, etc) are under our control...It [Yamantau Mountain] is operational, but digging is continued and it will never stop. But it is only one of many underground cities we have.
There is no known American ABM system so no stealth is required for the SS-24 or any other ICBM or SLBM.
They are not recon systems and they have been effectively replaced by systems with more capabilities over the last decade. Remember that those large arrays were built back in the days when the processing power of
I predicted the fall of the MAD system by 2001. And it has really fallen! By 2001, RUSSIA IS NO LONGER OFFICIALLY CONSIDERED AS A NUCLEAR POWER BY NATO. Why? Because Russia cannot retaliate. The RVSN (Russian nuclear missile army) is in ruins, the first warning system is destroyed (I have plans for a Russian warning system). Americans can destroy all the Russian nukes before they can even start—even without using US nukes, just with cruise missiles, placed in the ex-Soviet republics. Forget about the Cold War. Russia was never a military superpower. The Soviet Union was. Not Russia.
www.worldthreats.com...
Cruise missiles takes very long to arrive at leaves the enemy with very many options
Fourth stage—precise strikes with Kh-101 missiles, armed with “Marabu” stealth generators in order to cripple the American air and missile defenses. This stage will be combined with an attack on US space systems. Without satellites, the American army is crippled. Bombs with GPS navigation are useless. Satellite communication is destroyed. Communication with nuclear submarines is destroyed. The only thing left is a demoralized, blinded and disorganized conventional force, which poses no threat.
www.worldthreats.com...
Originally posted by aaaaa
But what fun it is to dream, eh?
Argumentative posters like Stellar love to paint contrary, imaginative pictures of Russian superiority
and American decadence by quoting creatures like Noam Chomsky
and citing endless sources to prove thier "case" but ignore fundamental weaknesses that plague Russian society and it's military in particular.
Here's a point often ignored: America tolerates and even offers a media stage to the Ramsey Clarkes, Cindy Sheehans and Cynthia McKinneys;
Vladimir Putin has such people assassinated.
Originally posted by aaaaa
But what fun it is to dream, eh?
Argumentative posters like Stellar love to paint contrary, imaginative pictures of Russian superiority and American decadence by quoting creatures like Noam Chomsky and citing endless sources to prove thier "case" but ignore fundamental weaknesses that plague Russian society and it's military in particular.
Here's a point often ignored: America tolerates and even offers a media stage to the Ramsey Clarkes, Cindy Sheehans and Cynthia McKinneys; Vladimir Putin has such people assassinated.
There are plenty of people who can cite all the instances of so called American superiority but that hardly explains the rapid economic and strategic decline America has been undergoing for decades now.