posted on Sep, 28 2009 @ 05:52 PM
If you have any understanding and awareness of the NWO and their nefarious schemes, then you have to realize that they are NOT going to let a site
like this go un dealt with.
I would go so far as to say that some of the more abusive and persistent 'trollers' are in fact paid professionals who's specialty it is to disrupt
and discredit any and all information that would give away the NWO's agendas and plans, as well as convincingly prove that the NWO is in fact behind
all the crap going on in the world today, aka conspiracy 'theories' pretty much. And if they can't discredit the info, they will discredit the
person providing the info. And if they can't do that, as mentioned previously, they will try to divert the thread away from the incriminating
information.
I feel comfortable saying this because I have encountered this kind of attack/disrupting behavior on any alternative type website I have ever gone to
that dealt with subjects that the NWO bunch don't want explored, like alternate health methodologies for example. And some of those yahoos get down
right vicious!
I can usually out psych them, but it still takes up way too much of my time to do so. And probably the ones who yell the quickest when you mention how
NWO trollish they are acting, are probably the ones who are. That whole 'reaction formation' thing. I love that line that they use. "Just because I
don't agree with you, doesn't mean I am a NWO TROLL!" when all along they have been dissing your information, spouting the party line and trying to
make you look crazy, stupid or out of touch with their version of 'reality'. Uh huh, yah. Sure you aren't a NWO flunkie dressed up as a troll.
*shakes head*
But do consider that some of these actually are NWO flunkies who would be the first to say 'oh that is so paranoid of you to think that!" *lol*
Manipulator is their name and character assassination/disinformation is their game. So if everyone didn't take it personally, but understood that
this was these guy's job, the trolling would be a lot less effective, I think.
[edit on 28-9-2009 by DragonriderGal]