It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Russian soldier
So, if there is a conflict, sanction, whatever, it probably means that the Russian weapons involved will become combat tested/proven/unproven, right?
Originally posted by pavil
Originally posted by Russian soldier
So, if there is a conflict, sanction, whatever, it probably means that the Russian weapons involved will become combat tested/proven/unproven, right?
Yes and no. It still will not be a very good test of Russian weapons as they will not be used to the level of effectiveness that the Russian armed forces would use them. Iranian tactics and strategy from recent history (Iran/Iraq war) leaves much to be desired. Good weapon systems with poor tactical choices made equals destroyed good weapon systems.
The weapons that Russia has sold to Iran will not be used to their full potential. Still they would get some real combat exposure, hopefully that won't have to happen.
SA-15
Originally posted by Russian soldier
I know that Russia sells weapons to Iran. The problem is, I don't know which ones.
Originally posted by Russian soldier
I don't like their president, particularley because of the comment "I will wipe all of Israel off the face of the earth".
Originally posted by longbow
For example they have no Sukhois-30, no modern tanks and lack quality AA defense.
Originally posted by longbow
Sadams army was certainly technologically more powerfull in first Gulf War - and it was 15 years ago! And we all know how it ended.
They may have advantage over Iraq in troop morale and geagraphy of country, but definitely not in technology.