It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by waynos
Fin, its not spectacular, its B/S. How is the F-35 supposed to carry EIGHT AMRAAMs internally?. I'm in full agreement with planeman and ch1466 on this occasion, look at the tail and the nose, they're both completely wrong. In my opinion this three view is just some fanboys 'fantasy upgrade' of the F-35C and not to be taken seriously.
Originally posted by emile
img.villagephotos.com...
I am sorry, I didn't identify this pic carefully. Now I strongly suspect the area I draw the outline of. If this is orininal picture there must be no white area as the background of weapon. But this is olny a suspicion. In terms of calculation of weapon load, this picture show each bomb loading is reasonable. So I think we must find where this picture come from? I am scared, what's the capability of integration of US weapon.
[edit on 19-8-2006 by emile]
Originally posted by waynos
Fin, its not spectacular, its B/S. How is the F-35 supposed to carry EIGHT AMRAAMs internally?.
Originally posted by Figher Master FIN
We can start by you telling how you find it.
Originally posted by ch1466
You need only look at the headon view of the inlets to see that the side-by-side loading of dual GBU-32 ('1,000lb JDAM') and even AMRAAM/GBU-39 is completely bogus because they block the inlet duct.
(Below) Line diagram's of the Lockheed Martin F-35B STOVL and F-35C CV JSF "Preferred Weapon System Concept" configuration 240-4 (dating to about June 2006), reflecting weight reduction and other design changes made since 2002.