It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
“Press Secretary Ari Fleischer: “Well, the reconstruction costs remain a very -- an issue for the future. And Iraq, unlike Afghanistan, is a rather wealthy country. Iraq has tremendous resources that belong to the Iraqi people. And so there are a variety of means that Iraq has to be able to shoulder much of the burden for their own reconstruction.” [Source: White House Press Briefing, 2/18/03]
Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage: “This is not Afghanistan…When we approach the question of Iraq, we realize here is a country which has a resource. And it’s obvious, it’s oil. And it can bring in and does bring in a certain amount of revenue each year…$10, $15, even $18 billion…this is not a broke country.” [Source: House Committee on Appropriations Hearing on a Supplemental War Regulation, 3/27/03]
Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz: “There’s a lot of money to pay for this that doesn’t have to be U.S. taxpayer money, and it starts with the assets of the Iraqi people…and on a rough recollection, the oil revenues of that country could bring between $50 and $100 billion over the course of the next two or three years…We’re dealing with a country that can really finance its own reconstruction, and relatively soon.” [Source: House Committee on Appropriations Hearing on a Supplemental War Regulation, 3/27/03]
Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld: “If you [Source: worry about just] the cost, the money, Iraq is a very different situation from Afghanistan…Iraq has oil. They have financial resources.” [Source: Fortune Magazine, Fall 2002]
State Department Official Alan Larson: “On the resource side, Iraq itself will rightly shoulder much of the responsibilities. Among the sources of revenue available are $1.7 billion in invested Iraqi assets, the found assets in Iraq…and unallocated oil-for-food money that will be deposited in the development fund.” [Source: Senate Foreign Relations Committee Hearing on Iraq Stabilization, 06/04/03]
Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld: “I don't believe that the United States has the responsibility for reconstruction, in a sense…[Reconstruction] funds can come from those various sources I mentioned: frozen assets, oil revenues and a variety of other things, including the Oil for Food, which has a very substantial number of billions of dollars in it. [Source: Senate Appropriations Hearing, 3/27/03]”
Originally posted by MagicaRose
Well, I think if they wanted a free country bad enough they would help with all the cash that they could afford.
The insurgents and terrorists seem to be killing more Iraqis then Americans. I wonder why.
Originally posted by MagicaRose
Well, I see that no one agrees with me .
Just alot of Bush bashing and hatred for our President and I don't want to hear it.
Why do you think they haven't attacked us again?
Because we have a President that won't back down and he keeps his word.
Originally posted by deltaboy
The Iraqis are pretty much paying much in blood and money fighting the insurgency as much as we are. So why is twitchy complaining? The insurgents and terrorists seem to be killing more Iraqis then Americans. I wonder why.
Originally posted by rich23
Originally posted by MagicaRose
Well, I think if they wanted a free country bad enough they would help with all the cash that they could afford.
They want a free country. A country free of Americans who are asset-stripping their economy and looting their treasury. The first thing Dubya did on gaining control of Iraq was to get his hands on the oil-for-food money, then worth about $5bn, THAT disappeared pretty quickly, I can tell you.
Mountains of cash have disappeared, unaccounted for, in bribes, shadowy weapons deals, and straight profiteering. And you want the Iraqis to pay for US troops to occupy their country?
Originally posted by MagicaRose
Well, I see that no one agrees with me .
Just alot of Bush bashing and hatred for our President and I don't want to hear it.
Why do you think they haven't attacked us again?
Because we have a President that won't back down and he keeps his word.
I don't like this war either.
I have a Grandson that will be 18 in 2 years and I worry about him having to go into a war that will never end.
P.S. I LIKE PRESIDENT BUSH.
External source
Currently, the Defense Department says it is spending about $4.5 billion a month on the conflict in Iraq, or about $100,000 per minute.
Originally posted by WyrdeOne
No more absurd than asking American taxpayers to subsidize sweetheart deals for military and oil services contractors, paying for a war they didn't want.
Nobody deserves to pay for this war except the people who profit from it. But of course they wouldn't be profitting if they had to front the money for invasion and occupation, so they piggy-backed on the good 'ol US of A and her allies.