It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
But everyone keeps talking about how the camera across the river recorded explosions, and people in the building reported hearing explosions.
Originally posted by AgentSmith
They may have heard explosions, as you would expect in a situation like this, but I find it hard to believe that a camcorder across the way can pick up these ear-shattering explosions and yet a microphone in the building near the point collapse initiated did not (even though it clearly picked up the collapsing noise).
Originally posted by AgentSmith
They may have heard explosions, as you would expect in a situation like this, but I find it hard to believe that a camcorder across the way can pick up these ear-shattering demolition explosions and yet a microphone in the building near the point collapse initiated did not (even though it clearly picked up the collapsing noise).
Originally posted by Zaphod58
As I've said over and over, there were so many things in that building that could explode. Yes, there were explosions reported. Does this automatically make them demo charges? No. Not even close. You had natural gas lines all through the building, transformers, on several levels IIRC, and many other things that could have caused explosions.
Originally posted by AgentSmith
Once again, if there were explosions in the base substantial enough to bring the buildings down, why did they clearly collapse down from the points of impact and how were there survivors in the lower floors of the core?
Originally posted by Griff
These people were in the part of the core that still stood I believe. So, how does one go from people on the first couple floors to being in the basement 6 floors lower?